{"title":"The Age and Provenance of Zaduo Group in the Qiangtang Basin: Constraints From Zircon U–Pb Geochronology and Palynology","authors":"Yanbin Li, Bo Zheng, Jie Dai, Yanxiong Zhang","doi":"10.1002/gj.5163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>A suite of organic-carbon-rich mudstones has been recently identified in the lower Carboniferous Zaduo Group in the eastern North Qiangtang Basin. Fossils from this group suggest an early Carboniferous depositional age. However, an unconformity recognised between the lower clastic rock unit and the upper carbonate unit of the Zaduo Group indicates a sedimentary hiatus. Here, we report detrital zircon U–Pb geochronological and sporopollen fossil data from the lower clastic rock unit of the Zaduo Group to examine its age. All the eight samples contain Triassic zircons and give a maximum depositional age of Late Triassic, which could also be indicated by the sporopollen results. This age revision has been roughly checked over a spatial span of 300 km in the eastern North Qiangtang Basin. The detrital zircon U–Pb age patterns highly resemble those from the Triassic Bagong Formation in the Qiangtang Basin and Upper Triassic flysch deposits in the Songpan-Garze Terrane. Considering the similarities in organic-carbon content, detrital zircon age patterns, rock assemblages, and spatial distributions between the lower clastic rock unit of the Zaduo Group and the Bagong Formation, it is quite possible that the lower unit of the Zaduo Group is an extension of the Bagong Formation. Moreover, the mudstones of Bagong Formation are the most important source rocks in the Qiangtang Basin, which requires more details and caution to verify the depositional age of the Zaduo Group. Further, the age revision highlights the need for caution to reevaluate the distribution of source rocks in the Qiangtang Basin.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12784,"journal":{"name":"Geological Journal","volume":"60 9","pages":"2140-2151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gj.5163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A suite of organic-carbon-rich mudstones has been recently identified in the lower Carboniferous Zaduo Group in the eastern North Qiangtang Basin. Fossils from this group suggest an early Carboniferous depositional age. However, an unconformity recognised between the lower clastic rock unit and the upper carbonate unit of the Zaduo Group indicates a sedimentary hiatus. Here, we report detrital zircon U–Pb geochronological and sporopollen fossil data from the lower clastic rock unit of the Zaduo Group to examine its age. All the eight samples contain Triassic zircons and give a maximum depositional age of Late Triassic, which could also be indicated by the sporopollen results. This age revision has been roughly checked over a spatial span of 300 km in the eastern North Qiangtang Basin. The detrital zircon U–Pb age patterns highly resemble those from the Triassic Bagong Formation in the Qiangtang Basin and Upper Triassic flysch deposits in the Songpan-Garze Terrane. Considering the similarities in organic-carbon content, detrital zircon age patterns, rock assemblages, and spatial distributions between the lower clastic rock unit of the Zaduo Group and the Bagong Formation, it is quite possible that the lower unit of the Zaduo Group is an extension of the Bagong Formation. Moreover, the mudstones of Bagong Formation are the most important source rocks in the Qiangtang Basin, which requires more details and caution to verify the depositional age of the Zaduo Group. Further, the age revision highlights the need for caution to reevaluate the distribution of source rocks in the Qiangtang Basin.
期刊介绍:
In recent years there has been a growth of specialist journals within geological sciences. Nevertheless, there is an important role for a journal of an interdisciplinary kind. Traditionally, GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL has been such a journal and continues in its aim of promoting interest in all branches of the Geological Sciences, through publication of original research papers and review articles. The journal publishes Special Issues with a common theme or regional coverage e.g. Chinese Dinosaurs; Tectonics of the Eastern Mediterranean, Triassic basins of the Central and North Atlantic Borderlands). These are extensively cited.
The Journal has a particular interest in publishing papers on regional case studies from any global locality which have conclusions of general interest. Such papers may emphasize aspects across the full spectrum of geological sciences.