Raziel A. Ordóñez, Shaun N. Casteel, Rachel H. Stevens, Sotirios V. Archontoulis, Tony J. Vyn
{"title":"Climate, Rotation, and Tillage Impacts on Soybean Yield Gains in a 50-Year Experiment","authors":"Raziel A. Ordóñez, Shaun N. Casteel, Rachel H. Stevens, Sotirios V. Archontoulis, Tony J. Vyn","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding how interactive management practices and climatic behavior influence soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] productivity is imperative to inform future production systems under changing climate. This study examined eight unique long-term production systems from 1975 to 2024 on a fertile rainfed Mollisol in Indiana, USA. Using this 400-unit field-scale dataset comparing soybean in monocropping versus following maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) across four tillage intensities (Moldboard Plow, Chisel, Ridge/Strip-Till and No-Till), we investigated how these practices interact with each other and with weather patterns. Our focus was on the spring (1 April–20 June) and summer (21 June–30 September) periods, and their effects on final yields and morphometric plant phenes. Soybean yield results during the 50-year period, when spring temperatures increased by 1.6°C, reflected (i) consistently positive yield responses to higher spring temperatures, at the rate of 796 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>/°C, especially in monocropping, despite concurrent development of wetter springs and drier summers; (ii) improved yield resilience in the No-Till versus tilled systems; (iii) average soybean yields rotated with maize were 7.7% above those in monocropping but varied widely with tillage and year; and (iv) yield gain rates over time averaging 29.5 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> for monocropping and 25.6 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> for rotation. Plant height at 4- and 8-weeks post-planting was more influenced by air temperatures than precipitation, but final yield differences among tillage intensities were proportionately much smaller than relative soybean height differences in spring. These findings of consistent yield gains across multiple rotation and tillage regimes, despite changing climate factors, can inform actionable strategies for sustainable food production in future warming climate scenarios. Additionally, the unique rotation/tillage outcomes for 50 years provide a unique baseline for process-based crop model calibration to enhance our ability to design future cropping systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.70469","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70469","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding how interactive management practices and climatic behavior influence soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] productivity is imperative to inform future production systems under changing climate. This study examined eight unique long-term production systems from 1975 to 2024 on a fertile rainfed Mollisol in Indiana, USA. Using this 400-unit field-scale dataset comparing soybean in monocropping versus following maize (Zea mays L.) across four tillage intensities (Moldboard Plow, Chisel, Ridge/Strip-Till and No-Till), we investigated how these practices interact with each other and with weather patterns. Our focus was on the spring (1 April–20 June) and summer (21 June–30 September) periods, and their effects on final yields and morphometric plant phenes. Soybean yield results during the 50-year period, when spring temperatures increased by 1.6°C, reflected (i) consistently positive yield responses to higher spring temperatures, at the rate of 796 kg ha−1/°C, especially in monocropping, despite concurrent development of wetter springs and drier summers; (ii) improved yield resilience in the No-Till versus tilled systems; (iii) average soybean yields rotated with maize were 7.7% above those in monocropping but varied widely with tillage and year; and (iv) yield gain rates over time averaging 29.5 kg ha−1 year−1 for monocropping and 25.6 kg ha−1 year−1 for rotation. Plant height at 4- and 8-weeks post-planting was more influenced by air temperatures than precipitation, but final yield differences among tillage intensities were proportionately much smaller than relative soybean height differences in spring. These findings of consistent yield gains across multiple rotation and tillage regimes, despite changing climate factors, can inform actionable strategies for sustainable food production in future warming climate scenarios. Additionally, the unique rotation/tillage outcomes for 50 years provide a unique baseline for process-based crop model calibration to enhance our ability to design future cropping systems.
了解交互管理实践和气候行为对大豆的影响[j]。稳定。生产力对于气候变化下的未来生产系统至关重要。本研究考察了1975年至2024年在美国印第安纳州肥沃的Mollisol旱地上的八个独特的长期生产系统。利用这个400个单位的大田尺度数据集,我们比较了四种耕作强度(犁耕、刨耕、垄作/带状耕作和免耕)下单作大豆与后续玉米(Zea mays L.)的差异,研究了这些耕作方式之间的相互作用以及与天气模式的相互作用。我们的重点是春季(4月1日至6月20日)和夏季(6月21日至9月30日),以及它们对最终产量和形态计量植物酚的影响。在50年期间,当春季温度升高1.6°C时,大豆产量结果反映了:(i)尽管春季较湿润,夏季较干燥,但对春季较高温度的持续正响应速率为796 kg ha - 1/°C,特别是单作;(ii)免耕与耕作系统的产量恢复能力提高;(3)轮作玉米的大豆平均产量比单作高7.7%,但不同耕作方式和年份差异较大;(iv)单作的长期增产率平均为29.5公斤公顷- 1年,轮作的平均为25.6公斤公顷- 1年。播种后4周和8周的株高受气温的影响大于降水,但不同耕作强度的最终产量差异成比例地远小于春季大豆相对株高差异。这些发现表明,尽管气候因素不断变化,但多种轮作和耕作制度的产量仍能持续增长,这可以为未来气候变暖情景下可持续粮食生产的可行战略提供信息。此外,50年来独特的轮作/耕作结果为基于过程的作物模型校准提供了独特的基线,以提高我们设计未来种植系统的能力。
期刊介绍:
Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health.
Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.