PCR With Specific Primers for Detection of Rhizoctonia solani Anastomosis Groups Reveals Lack of Specificity

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES
Lucas Correia Santana Amancio, Alexandre Reis Machado, Cristina Maria de Souza-Motta, Juan Manuel Tovar-Pedraza, Ailton Reis, Kamila Câmara Correia, Sami Jorge Michereff
{"title":"PCR With Specific Primers for Detection of Rhizoctonia solani Anastomosis Groups Reveals Lack of Specificity","authors":"Lucas Correia Santana Amancio,&nbsp;Alexandre Reis Machado,&nbsp;Cristina Maria de Souza-Motta,&nbsp;Juan Manuel Tovar-Pedraza,&nbsp;Ailton Reis,&nbsp;Kamila Câmara Correia,&nbsp;Sami Jorge Michereff","doi":"10.1111/jph.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several specific primers based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA have been used to discriminate anastomosis groups (AGs) and subgroups in <i>Rhizoctonia solani</i>, but the efficacy of these primers was not evaluated considering several known AGs. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of seven PCR-specific primers for the detection of four AGs and subgroups of <i>R. solani</i> (AG-1 IA, AG-1 IB, AG-2-1, AG-3 PT, AG-3 TB, AG-4 HGI, and AG-4 HGII). Thirteen isolates of <i>R. solani</i> and seven isolates of binucleate <i>Rhizoctonia</i> belonging to different AGs and subgroups were used in the detection assays and were amplified and sequenced using ITS1 and ITS4 universal primers to confirm the previous identification of AGs and the viability of the DNA samples. In addition, three isolates of unrelated fungal species (<i>Fusarium oxysporum, Macrophomina phaseolina,</i> and <i>Sclerotium rolfsii</i>) were tested simultaneously with each primer set above as a negative control. All primers tested nonspecifically amplified other AGs, and most of the primers produced bands for unrelated fungal species. Therefore, the exclusive use of these primers under the PCR conditions should be avoided due to the lack of accuracy in the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phytopathology","volume":"173 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jph.70162","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jph.70162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several specific primers based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA have been used to discriminate anastomosis groups (AGs) and subgroups in Rhizoctonia solani, but the efficacy of these primers was not evaluated considering several known AGs. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of seven PCR-specific primers for the detection of four AGs and subgroups of R. solani (AG-1 IA, AG-1 IB, AG-2-1, AG-3 PT, AG-3 TB, AG-4 HGI, and AG-4 HGII). Thirteen isolates of R. solani and seven isolates of binucleate Rhizoctonia belonging to different AGs and subgroups were used in the detection assays and were amplified and sequenced using ITS1 and ITS4 universal primers to confirm the previous identification of AGs and the viability of the DNA samples. In addition, three isolates of unrelated fungal species (Fusarium oxysporum, Macrophomina phaseolina, and Sclerotium rolfsii) were tested simultaneously with each primer set above as a negative control. All primers tested nonspecifically amplified other AGs, and most of the primers produced bands for unrelated fungal species. Therefore, the exclusive use of these primers under the PCR conditions should be avoided due to the lack of accuracy in the results.

用特异性引物PCR检测茄根丝核菌吻合群缺乏特异性
基于rDNA内部转录间隔区(ITS)的几种特异性引物已被用于区分茄根丝核菌的吻合群(AGs)和亚群,但考虑到几种已知的AGs,这些引物的效果尚未得到评价。本研究旨在评价7种pcr特异性引物检测4种AGs及其亚群(AG-1 IA、AG-1 IB、AG-2-1、AG-3 PT、AG-3 TB、AG-4 HGI和AG-4 HGII)的效果。采用不同AGs和亚群的13株索拉尼真菌和7株双核根核菌分离株进行检测,利用ITS1和ITS4通用引物进行扩增和测序,以证实之前鉴定的AGs和DNA样品的活力。另外,用上述引物作为阴性对照,同时检测了3株不相关真菌(尖孢镰刀菌、phaseolina Macrophomina和Sclerotium rolfsii)。所有引物都非特异性扩增其他AGs,大多数引物产生的条带与不相关的真菌物种有关。因此,由于结果缺乏准确性,应避免在PCR条件下单独使用这些引物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Phytopathology
Journal of Phytopathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Phytopathology publishes original and review articles on all scientific aspects of applied phytopathology in agricultural and horticultural crops. Preference is given to contributions improving our understanding of the biotic and abiotic determinants of plant diseases, including epidemics and damage potential, as a basis for innovative disease management, modelling and forecasting. This includes practical aspects and the development of methods for disease diagnosis as well as infection bioassays. Studies at the population, organism, physiological, biochemical and molecular genetic level are welcome. The journal scope comprises the pathology and epidemiology of plant diseases caused by microbial pathogens, viruses and nematodes. Accepted papers should advance our conceptual knowledge of plant diseases, rather than presenting descriptive or screening data unrelated to phytopathological mechanisms or functions. Results from unrepeated experimental conditions or data with no or inappropriate statistical processing will not be considered. Authors are encouraged to look at past issues to ensure adherence to the standards of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信