Effect of contact angle on the determination of tensile strength in the Brazilian test

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS
Huaizi Tang, Yanchun Hu, Lin Lang, Jun Xu, Jiuzhou Huang, Wen Hua, Shiming Dong
{"title":"Effect of contact angle on the determination of tensile strength in the Brazilian test","authors":"Huaizi Tang,&nbsp;Yanchun Hu,&nbsp;Lin Lang,&nbsp;Jun Xu,&nbsp;Jiuzhou Huang,&nbsp;Wen Hua,&nbsp;Shiming Dong","doi":"10.1007/s00419-025-02937-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assessing the validity of tensile strength determination in the Brazilian test is a classical problem in fracture mechanics. According to reports, the Brazilian splitting strength is generally lower than the direct tensile strength in most cases, while in a minority of cases it is higher. Based on the analytical solution of the stress field in an uncracked disc under parabolic loading and Griffith's fracture criterion, this paper proposes a novel modified formula for calculating tensile strength <i>σ</i><sub>t</sub> that accounts for the influence of the load contact angle. Additionally, according to the principles of error analysis, an error transfer function is derived to evaluate the effect of measurement error on contact angle. Finally, the modified formula presented in this paper is applied to calculate the tensile strength of sandstone under both flat-platen and curved-jaw loading conditions. The results are then compared with those obtained using a classical formula. The theoretical analysis shows that the classical formula underestimates the tensile strength of materials at small contact angles, whereas it overestimates the tensile strength at large contact angles. Additionally, measurement errors in the contact angle have a certain influence on the determination of <i>σ</i><sub>t</sub>. For the case of contact semi-angle <i>γ</i> ≥ 10° with measurement error Δ<i>γ</i> ≤ 1°, the tensile strength determination error remains below 5%. The experimental results show that the classical formula yields lower tensile strength values for sandstone under flat-platen loading compared to curved-jaw loading, whereas the proposed modified formula demonstrates excellent consistency between both loading configurations. The modified formula accounts for the dual-aspect influence of contact angle on tensile strength determination: (i) qualitative—governing the fracture initiation position of the disc, and (ii) quantitative—modulating the magnitude distribution of internal stress components.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":477,"journal":{"name":"Archive of Applied Mechanics","volume":"95 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive of Applied Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00419-025-02937-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing the validity of tensile strength determination in the Brazilian test is a classical problem in fracture mechanics. According to reports, the Brazilian splitting strength is generally lower than the direct tensile strength in most cases, while in a minority of cases it is higher. Based on the analytical solution of the stress field in an uncracked disc under parabolic loading and Griffith's fracture criterion, this paper proposes a novel modified formula for calculating tensile strength σt that accounts for the influence of the load contact angle. Additionally, according to the principles of error analysis, an error transfer function is derived to evaluate the effect of measurement error on contact angle. Finally, the modified formula presented in this paper is applied to calculate the tensile strength of sandstone under both flat-platen and curved-jaw loading conditions. The results are then compared with those obtained using a classical formula. The theoretical analysis shows that the classical formula underestimates the tensile strength of materials at small contact angles, whereas it overestimates the tensile strength at large contact angles. Additionally, measurement errors in the contact angle have a certain influence on the determination of σt. For the case of contact semi-angle γ ≥ 10° with measurement error Δγ ≤ 1°, the tensile strength determination error remains below 5%. The experimental results show that the classical formula yields lower tensile strength values for sandstone under flat-platen loading compared to curved-jaw loading, whereas the proposed modified formula demonstrates excellent consistency between both loading configurations. The modified formula accounts for the dual-aspect influence of contact angle on tensile strength determination: (i) qualitative—governing the fracture initiation position of the disc, and (ii) quantitative—modulating the magnitude distribution of internal stress components.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

接触角对巴西试验抗拉强度测定的影响
评估巴西试验中抗拉强度测定的有效性是断裂力学中的一个经典问题。据报道,在大多数情况下,巴西劈裂强度一般低于直接抗拉强度,而在少数情况下则高于直接抗拉强度。基于抛物载荷作用下无裂纹圆盘的应力场解析解和Griffith断裂准则,提出了考虑载荷接触角影响的抗拉强度σt的修正计算公式。此外,根据误差分析原理,导出了误差传递函数,以评价测量误差对接触角的影响。最后,将本文提出的修正公式应用于平板加载和弯颚加载条件下砂岩的抗拉强度计算。然后与经典公式的计算结果进行了比较。理论分析表明,经典公式低估了材料在小接触角时的抗拉强度,而高估了大接触角时的抗拉强度。此外,接触角的测量误差对σt的测定也有一定的影响。当接触半角γ≥10°,测量误差Δγ≤1°时,抗拉强度测定误差保持在5%以下。实验结果表明,平板加载下砂岩的经典抗拉强度值低于弯颚加载,而修正后的公式在两种加载方式下具有良好的一致性。修正后的公式考虑了接触角对抗拉强度测定的双重影响:(i)定性地控制盘的起裂位置,(ii)定量地调节内应力分量的大小分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archive of Applied Mechanics serves as a platform to communicate original research of scholarly value in all branches of theoretical and applied mechanics, i.e., in solid and fluid mechanics, dynamics and vibrations. It focuses on continuum mechanics in general, structural mechanics, biomechanics, micro- and nano-mechanics as well as hydrodynamics. In particular, the following topics are emphasised: thermodynamics of materials, material modeling, multi-physics, mechanical properties of materials, homogenisation, phase transitions, fracture and damage mechanics, vibration, wave propagation experimental mechanics as well as machine learning techniques in the context of applied mechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信