Characteristics and Outcomes of Limb Loss Support Groups

IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION
Jennifer Crumling MD, Nicole Crumling MD, Prateek Grover MD, PhD, MHA
{"title":"Characteristics and Outcomes of Limb Loss Support Groups","authors":"Jennifer Crumling MD,&nbsp;Nicole Crumling MD,&nbsp;Prateek Grover MD, PhD, MHA","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically understand the structure and outcomes of limb loss support groups.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>Literature review performed during June and July 2024. Search strategy included terms related to amputation and support group. Databases included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Publication range was 2009-2024.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalyses methodology was used to identify 7 appropriate articles of 199 initial articles. Study quality was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Logic model constructs were used to extract support group inputs, outputs, and outcomes, and Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change constructs were used to extract recommendations/strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>All 7 studies discussed inputs including participant age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Most support groups were predominantly White and younger and had more affluent attendees than the general limb loss population. Outputs were discussed in 5 studies, with location, group leadership, and other personnel being the most commonly discussed outputs. All studies discussed positive outcomes such as physical ability and mobility improvement on the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility, emotional development with improved Posttraumatic Growth Index scores and depression symptoms, and learning and prosthesis advancement with improved self-efficacy and return to life. Six articles discussed implementation strategies including facilitation of support groups, promotion of adaptability, shadowing of other experts, and tailoring of strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These data highlight structure, development strategies, and positive effects of support groups for mobility, emotional well-being, and learning in individuals with limb loss. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the need for continued investigation into support mechanisms and formal incorporation of support groups into limb loss rehabilitation programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 100485"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109525000606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To systematically understand the structure and outcomes of limb loss support groups.

Data Sources

Literature review performed during June and July 2024. Search strategy included terms related to amputation and support group. Databases included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Publication range was 2009-2024.

Study Selection

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalyses methodology was used to identify 7 appropriate articles of 199 initial articles. Study quality was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scale.

Data Extraction

Logic model constructs were used to extract support group inputs, outputs, and outcomes, and Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change constructs were used to extract recommendations/strategies.

Data Synthesis

All 7 studies discussed inputs including participant age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Most support groups were predominantly White and younger and had more affluent attendees than the general limb loss population. Outputs were discussed in 5 studies, with location, group leadership, and other personnel being the most commonly discussed outputs. All studies discussed positive outcomes such as physical ability and mobility improvement on the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility, emotional development with improved Posttraumatic Growth Index scores and depression symptoms, and learning and prosthesis advancement with improved self-efficacy and return to life. Six articles discussed implementation strategies including facilitation of support groups, promotion of adaptability, shadowing of other experts, and tailoring of strategies.

Conclusions

These data highlight structure, development strategies, and positive effects of support groups for mobility, emotional well-being, and learning in individuals with limb loss. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the need for continued investigation into support mechanisms and formal incorporation of support groups into limb loss rehabilitation programs.
肢体丧失支持小组的特点和结果
目的系统地了解肢体丧失支持团体的结构和结果。数据来源2024年6月和7月进行的文献综述。搜索策略包括与截肢和支持团体相关的术语。数据库包括PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL、Cochrane Library。出版范围为2009-2024年。研究选择系统评价的首选报告项目和荟萃分析方法用于从199篇初始文章中确定7篇合适的文章。研究质量采用国家心脏、肺和血液研究所量表进行评估。数据提取逻辑模型构造用于提取支持小组的输入、输出和结果,专家建议实施变革构造用于提取建议/策略。所有7项研究都讨论了包括参与者年龄、性别和种族/民族在内的输入。大多数支持团体主要是白人和年轻人,比一般肢体丧失人群有更多的富裕参与者。在5项研究中讨论了产出,其中地点、团队领导和其他人员是最常讨论的产出。所有的研究都讨论了积极的结果,如假肢使用者活动能力调查的身体能力和活动能力的改善,创伤后生长指数得分和抑郁症状的改善,以及学习和假肢的进步,自我效能感的提高和生活的恢复。六篇文章讨论了实施策略,包括促进支持小组、提高适应性、跟随其他专家以及调整策略。结论:这些数据突出了支持团体的结构、发展策略以及对肢体丧失个体的行动能力、情绪健康和学习的积极影响。此外,本研究强调需要继续研究支持机制,并将支持团体正式纳入肢体丧失康复计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信