Evaluating Physical and Occupational Therapists’ and Assistants’ Experiences Implementing an Electronic Health Record-Based Intervention to Support Perioperative Patients’ Use of Nonpharmacological Pain Management Techniques
Jane T. Hein PT , Sarah Redmond PhD , Lina Daus DPT , Monica Heinemann MOT , Jon Tilburt MD , Andrea Cheville MD, MSCE
{"title":"Evaluating Physical and Occupational Therapists’ and Assistants’ Experiences Implementing an Electronic Health Record-Based Intervention to Support Perioperative Patients’ Use of Nonpharmacological Pain Management Techniques","authors":"Jane T. Hein PT , Sarah Redmond PhD , Lina Daus DPT , Monica Heinemann MOT , Jon Tilburt MD , Andrea Cheville MD, MSCE","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore barriers and facilitators experienced by therapists (physical therapists/assistants and occupational therapists/assistants) supporting the implementation of the electronic health record (EHR)-based Healing After Surgery (HAS) initiative, which used clinical decision support (CDS) elements to support therapists in providing perioperative education and support to patients for the use of evidence-based nonpharmacological pain care (NPPC) techniques as part of a health system-wide clinical trial.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional web-based survey.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Three academic and 3 community-based hospitals from the same health system.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Therapists (N=236) who delivered the EHR-based HAS initiative.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Barriers and facilitators that therapists experienced implementing the EHR-based HAS initiative.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We received survey responses from therapists (34.6% response rate). Using a numerical rating scale (1=not at all, 10=a great deal), therapists reported the highest agreement to questions regarding understanding the goal of the initiative (mean ± SD, 7.3±2.4) and alignment of the initiative with therapy practice (mean ± SD, 7.2±2.4), followed by alignment with patient needs (mean ± SD, 6.7±2.4). Ratings were slightly lower for understanding of their role (mean ± SD, 6.5±2.3), leadership support (mean ± SD, 6.3±2.4), and adequacy of training (mean ± SD, 6.2±2.4). Therapists rated the helpfulness of CDS elements at the midpoint of the scale, with mean ratings ranging from 5.0 to 5.1. Only 27% of therapists felt equipped to educate patients on all NPPC techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The EHR-based HAS initiative was perceived to align with standard therapy care. However, many therapists did not feel equipped to support all NPPC techniques. Similar future efforts should address additional training needs and CDS refinement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 100462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109525000370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To explore barriers and facilitators experienced by therapists (physical therapists/assistants and occupational therapists/assistants) supporting the implementation of the electronic health record (EHR)-based Healing After Surgery (HAS) initiative, which used clinical decision support (CDS) elements to support therapists in providing perioperative education and support to patients for the use of evidence-based nonpharmacological pain care (NPPC) techniques as part of a health system-wide clinical trial.
Design
A cross-sectional web-based survey.
Setting
Three academic and 3 community-based hospitals from the same health system.
Participants
Therapists (N=236) who delivered the EHR-based HAS initiative.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Barriers and facilitators that therapists experienced implementing the EHR-based HAS initiative.
Results
We received survey responses from therapists (34.6% response rate). Using a numerical rating scale (1=not at all, 10=a great deal), therapists reported the highest agreement to questions regarding understanding the goal of the initiative (mean ± SD, 7.3±2.4) and alignment of the initiative with therapy practice (mean ± SD, 7.2±2.4), followed by alignment with patient needs (mean ± SD, 6.7±2.4). Ratings were slightly lower for understanding of their role (mean ± SD, 6.5±2.3), leadership support (mean ± SD, 6.3±2.4), and adequacy of training (mean ± SD, 6.2±2.4). Therapists rated the helpfulness of CDS elements at the midpoint of the scale, with mean ratings ranging from 5.0 to 5.1. Only 27% of therapists felt equipped to educate patients on all NPPC techniques.
Conclusions
The EHR-based HAS initiative was perceived to align with standard therapy care. However, many therapists did not feel equipped to support all NPPC techniques. Similar future efforts should address additional training needs and CDS refinement.