Retrospective Case-Control Study on the Effect of In-Person Physical Therapy With Remote Therapeutic Monitoring on Functional Outcomes and Plan of Care Adherence Amongst Individuals With Musculoskeletal Conditions
Timothy Marshall PhD, MHA, MS, , Andrew Goldman MS , Robert Lyles PT, DPT, SCS, CSCS , M. Jake Grundstein PT, DPT, MS, MBA , Negar Ahmadian BA , Thomas A. Koc Jr PT, DPT, PhD, CIMT , Marc Gruner DO, MBA
{"title":"Retrospective Case-Control Study on the Effect of In-Person Physical Therapy With Remote Therapeutic Monitoring on Functional Outcomes and Plan of Care Adherence Amongst Individuals With Musculoskeletal Conditions","authors":"Timothy Marshall PhD, MHA, MS, , Andrew Goldman MS , Robert Lyles PT, DPT, SCS, CSCS , M. Jake Grundstein PT, DPT, MS, MBA , Negar Ahmadian BA , Thomas A. Koc Jr PT, DPT, PhD, CIMT , Marc Gruner DO, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy of in-person physical therapy (PT) coupled with remote therapeutic monitoring (RTM) compared to in-person PT only on patient outcomes and care delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A case-control study</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>95 private practice physical therapy clinics. RTM is delivered at home via a mobile application.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Inclusion criteria included: (1) Adults ≥18 years of age, (2) musculoskeletal diagnosis, (3) clinician-prescribed PT, (4) at least 2 outcome measures. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in RTM. A control group was generated using 3:1 matching based on: age, sex, case type, and intake patient-reported outcome score. Three hundred and six cases for the in-person PT + RTM group (N = 306) and 918 (N = 918) controls were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>RTM Patients were enrolled in a home exercise program administered through a mobile application, with digital exercise therapy videos and care navigation support. Both RTM and control patients were enrolled in in-person PT.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Achieving the discharge functional status score as measured by the binary yes/no Functional Status Benchmark.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A significantly greater proportion of PT + RTM patients achieved the Functional Statue Benchmark (72%) compared to the control group (63%, <em>P</em>=.004). A statistically greater proportion of PT + RTM patients attended more than 2 visits per week (36%) compared to the control group (24%, <em>P</em><.001). When controlling all variables, RTM participation was a significant predictor of achieving the discharge functional status score as measured by the binary yes/no Functional Status Benchmark (adjusted odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.22).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The inclusion of RTM with in-person PT facilitated better patient engagement and patient-reported outcomes compared to in-person PT only.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 100466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109525000412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of in-person physical therapy (PT) coupled with remote therapeutic monitoring (RTM) compared to in-person PT only on patient outcomes and care delivery.
Design
A case-control study
Setting
95 private practice physical therapy clinics. RTM is delivered at home via a mobile application.
Participants
Inclusion criteria included: (1) Adults ≥18 years of age, (2) musculoskeletal diagnosis, (3) clinician-prescribed PT, (4) at least 2 outcome measures. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in RTM. A control group was generated using 3:1 matching based on: age, sex, case type, and intake patient-reported outcome score. Three hundred and six cases for the in-person PT + RTM group (N = 306) and 918 (N = 918) controls were identified.
Interventions
RTM Patients were enrolled in a home exercise program administered through a mobile application, with digital exercise therapy videos and care navigation support. Both RTM and control patients were enrolled in in-person PT.
Main Outcome Measures
Achieving the discharge functional status score as measured by the binary yes/no Functional Status Benchmark.
Results
A significantly greater proportion of PT + RTM patients achieved the Functional Statue Benchmark (72%) compared to the control group (63%, P=.004). A statistically greater proportion of PT + RTM patients attended more than 2 visits per week (36%) compared to the control group (24%, P<.001). When controlling all variables, RTM participation was a significant predictor of achieving the discharge functional status score as measured by the binary yes/no Functional Status Benchmark (adjusted odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.22).
Conclusions
The inclusion of RTM with in-person PT facilitated better patient engagement and patient-reported outcomes compared to in-person PT only.