Objective data-driven insights into pedestrian decisions, comprehensibility, and perceived safety of autonomous vehicles with varied eHMIs: Evidence from a real-world experiment

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Tianpei Tang , Bang Luo , Wei Wang , Xiaofan Xue , Shengnan Zhao , Yuntao Guo
{"title":"Objective data-driven insights into pedestrian decisions, comprehensibility, and perceived safety of autonomous vehicles with varied eHMIs: Evidence from a real-world experiment","authors":"Tianpei Tang ,&nbsp;Bang Luo ,&nbsp;Wei Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaofan Xue ,&nbsp;Shengnan Zhao ,&nbsp;Yuntao Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In future traffic environments dominated by highly autonomous vehicles (AVs), pedestrians may face challenges in accurately interpreting AV behavior, thereby potentially increasing the risk of pedestrian-AV interactions. External human–machine interfaces (eHMIs) have been proposed to facilitate communication between AVs and pedestrians; however, comprehensive evaluations using objective data from real-world interactions are limited. This study developed a systematic evaluation framework grounded in the ISO 9241–11 standard, integrating four key indicators: decision accuracy, comprehensibility, decision efficiency, and perceived safety. Objective data were collected through behavioral observation and eye tracking, with decision accuracy, total fixation time, decision time, and the coefficient of variation of pupil diameter as quantitative metrics. The study examined the effects of eHMI types (light-band, symbol, text), deceleration strategies (gentle, early, aggressive braking, no braking), and yielding behaviors (yielding, non-yielding) on pedestrian decision-making and perceptions. A total of 24 participants were recruited for a real-world crossing interaction experiment. The results showed that eHMIs significantly improved decision accuracy under yielding conditions, while decision accuracy remained high under non-yielding conditions regardless of eHMI type. eHMIs enhanced comprehensibility, with symbol-based and text-based eHMIs performing better than light-band eHMIs. eHMIs also improved pedestrian decision efficiency and perceived safety, with significant differences observed across different eHMI types and yielding behaviors. Furthermore, while deceleration strategies had no significant effect on eHMI comprehensibility or decision efficiency, they played a crucial role in shaping perceived safety. These findings inform the design of eHMIs and deceleration strategies to optimize pedestrian-AV interactions, contributing to safer AV integration in traffic environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 108227"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000145752500315X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In future traffic environments dominated by highly autonomous vehicles (AVs), pedestrians may face challenges in accurately interpreting AV behavior, thereby potentially increasing the risk of pedestrian-AV interactions. External human–machine interfaces (eHMIs) have been proposed to facilitate communication between AVs and pedestrians; however, comprehensive evaluations using objective data from real-world interactions are limited. This study developed a systematic evaluation framework grounded in the ISO 9241–11 standard, integrating four key indicators: decision accuracy, comprehensibility, decision efficiency, and perceived safety. Objective data were collected through behavioral observation and eye tracking, with decision accuracy, total fixation time, decision time, and the coefficient of variation of pupil diameter as quantitative metrics. The study examined the effects of eHMI types (light-band, symbol, text), deceleration strategies (gentle, early, aggressive braking, no braking), and yielding behaviors (yielding, non-yielding) on pedestrian decision-making and perceptions. A total of 24 participants were recruited for a real-world crossing interaction experiment. The results showed that eHMIs significantly improved decision accuracy under yielding conditions, while decision accuracy remained high under non-yielding conditions regardless of eHMI type. eHMIs enhanced comprehensibility, with symbol-based and text-based eHMIs performing better than light-band eHMIs. eHMIs also improved pedestrian decision efficiency and perceived safety, with significant differences observed across different eHMI types and yielding behaviors. Furthermore, while deceleration strategies had no significant effect on eHMI comprehensibility or decision efficiency, they played a crucial role in shaping perceived safety. These findings inform the design of eHMIs and deceleration strategies to optimize pedestrian-AV interactions, contributing to safer AV integration in traffic environments.
客观数据驱动的洞察行人决策、可理解性和不同ehmi的自动驾驶汽车的感知安全性:来自现实世界实验的证据
在高度自动驾驶汽车(AV)主导的未来交通环境中,行人可能面临准确解读自动驾驶汽车行为的挑战,从而潜在地增加行人与自动驾驶汽车相互作用的风险。提出了外部人机界面(eHMIs),以促进自动驾驶汽车与行人之间的通信;然而,利用现实世界相互作用的客观数据进行综合评估是有限的。本研究开发了一个基于ISO 9241-11标准的系统评估框架,整合了四个关键指标:决策准确性、可理解性、决策效率和感知安全性。通过行为观察和眼动追踪收集客观数据,以决策准确率、总注视时间、决策时间和瞳孔直径变异系数为定量指标。研究考察了eHMI类型(光带、标志、文字)、减速策略(温和、提前、积极制动、不制动)和让行行为(让行、不让行)对行人决策和感知的影响。共招募了24名参与者进行真实世界的交叉互动实验。结果表明,eHMI在屈服条件下显著提高了决策精度,而在非屈服条件下,无论eHMI类型如何,决策精度都保持较高。eHMIs增强了可理解性,基于符号和基于文本的eHMIs表现优于光波段eHMIs。eHMI还提高了行人的决策效率和感知安全,不同eHMI类型和屈服行为之间存在显著差异。此外,尽管减速策略对eHMI的可理解性和决策效率没有显著影响,但它们对感知安全的形成起着至关重要的作用。这些发现为ehmi和减速策略的设计提供了信息,以优化行人与自动驾驶汽车的互动,从而有助于在交通环境中更安全地整合自动驾驶汽车。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信