Ena Mahapatra MD, MS, Romina Kee MD, MPH, Kyungran Shim MD, Cathy Rowell RN, William E. Trick MD, David Goldberg MD
{"title":"Epidemiology of Colon Cancer Screening in a Safety-Net Setting","authors":"Ena Mahapatra MD, MS, Romina Kee MD, MPH, Kyungran Shim MD, Cathy Rowell RN, William E. Trick MD, David Goldberg MD","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2025.100403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study was aimed to describe the epidemiology of colon cancer screening in an underserved population. This is a cohort study, conducted in a primary care clinic in a safety-net public hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients aged 49–78 years were categorized by initial screening status and followed over 28 months. Status was categorized into the following 3 groups with 8 subgroups: screening eligible (up to date or not up to date), non-screening eligible (Personal history of colon cancer, surveillance for colon cancer, work-up in progress, poor health status, and indeterminate), and refusal. Patient egress was defined as no primary care visit for 12 months or <2 primary care visits separated by 60 days over 24 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1,074 patients reviewed, 856 (80%) were screening eligible, 177 (16%) were non-screening eligible, and 41 (4%) refused screening. Over 28 months, most patients retained in the practice did not change category (<em>n</em>=949; 88%). Of 125 patients who changed, most (<em>n</em>=101) went from screening eligible to non-screening eligible, most commonly to surveillance and work-up in progress subgroups. Egress was common; nearly half of patients (47%) were not evaluated owing to egress.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Maintaining a colon cancer registry was complex owing to the dynamic nature of screening status and unstable primary care attendance. Regional integration of electronic health records could substantially reduce manual effort.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":"4 5","pages":"Article 100403"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065425000914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
This study was aimed to describe the epidemiology of colon cancer screening in an underserved population. This is a cohort study, conducted in a primary care clinic in a safety-net public hospital.
Methods
Patients aged 49–78 years were categorized by initial screening status and followed over 28 months. Status was categorized into the following 3 groups with 8 subgroups: screening eligible (up to date or not up to date), non-screening eligible (Personal history of colon cancer, surveillance for colon cancer, work-up in progress, poor health status, and indeterminate), and refusal. Patient egress was defined as no primary care visit for 12 months or <2 primary care visits separated by 60 days over 24 months.
Results
Of 1,074 patients reviewed, 856 (80%) were screening eligible, 177 (16%) were non-screening eligible, and 41 (4%) refused screening. Over 28 months, most patients retained in the practice did not change category (n=949; 88%). Of 125 patients who changed, most (n=101) went from screening eligible to non-screening eligible, most commonly to surveillance and work-up in progress subgroups. Egress was common; nearly half of patients (47%) were not evaluated owing to egress.
Conclusions
Maintaining a colon cancer registry was complex owing to the dynamic nature of screening status and unstable primary care attendance. Regional integration of electronic health records could substantially reduce manual effort.