State Medical Cannabis Policy Implementation and Racial Disparities in Opioid Prescribing Among Medicare Beneficiaries: A Policy Impact Analysis

IF 2.8
AJPM focus Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.focus.2025.100391
Tyler J. Dunn PhD , Erin Holmes PhD , Yi Yang PhD , John P. Bentley PhD , Saim Kashmiri PhD , Sujith Ramachandran PhD
{"title":"State Medical Cannabis Policy Implementation and Racial Disparities in Opioid Prescribing Among Medicare Beneficiaries: A Policy Impact Analysis","authors":"Tyler J. Dunn PhD ,&nbsp;Erin Holmes PhD ,&nbsp;Yi Yang PhD ,&nbsp;John P. Bentley PhD ,&nbsp;Saim Kashmiri PhD ,&nbsp;Sujith Ramachandran PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2025.100391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>U.S. cannabis policies have a history of racial disparities, highlighting the need for research surrounding racial inequities, particularly within the context of medicalization of cannabis and opioid prescribing. This study evaluated racial disparities in the relationship between state-level medical cannabis policy implementation and changes in opioid-prescribing patterns among Medicare beneficiaries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Utilizing Medicare claims data from 2012 to 2015, beneficiaries aged ≥65 years were categorized into 3 state categories: Medical marijuana law implementation states, existing medical marijuana law states, and nonmedical marijuana law states. A difference-in-difference analysis was used to determine whether race moderated the relationship between medical cannabis policy implementation and opioid doses filled before and after policy implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 449,336 Medicare beneficiaries were included in the study, comprising 387,713 White individuals (86.3%) and 61,623 racial minority individuals (13.7%). Nearly half of all (49.3%) beneficiaries received at least 1 opioid prescription. White individuals were significantly more likely to receive at least 1 opioid prescription than racial minorities (49.7% vs 46.8%, <em>p</em>&lt;0.001). Morphine milligram equivalent per patient per month significantly increased for both White and racial minority individuals in all state categories, except for racial minority individuals in the medical marijuana law states. There were no significant differences in opioid-prescribing changes between White and racial minority individuals between state categories.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study found no clear indication of racial disparities in the impact of medical cannabis policies on opioid prescribing. Future research should focus on access to medical cannabis and prescriber attitudes toward treating racial minority patients experiencing pain with cannabis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":"4 5","pages":"Article 100391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065425000793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

U.S. cannabis policies have a history of racial disparities, highlighting the need for research surrounding racial inequities, particularly within the context of medicalization of cannabis and opioid prescribing. This study evaluated racial disparities in the relationship between state-level medical cannabis policy implementation and changes in opioid-prescribing patterns among Medicare beneficiaries.

Methods

Utilizing Medicare claims data from 2012 to 2015, beneficiaries aged ≥65 years were categorized into 3 state categories: Medical marijuana law implementation states, existing medical marijuana law states, and nonmedical marijuana law states. A difference-in-difference analysis was used to determine whether race moderated the relationship between medical cannabis policy implementation and opioid doses filled before and after policy implementation.

Results

A total of 449,336 Medicare beneficiaries were included in the study, comprising 387,713 White individuals (86.3%) and 61,623 racial minority individuals (13.7%). Nearly half of all (49.3%) beneficiaries received at least 1 opioid prescription. White individuals were significantly more likely to receive at least 1 opioid prescription than racial minorities (49.7% vs 46.8%, p<0.001). Morphine milligram equivalent per patient per month significantly increased for both White and racial minority individuals in all state categories, except for racial minority individuals in the medical marijuana law states. There were no significant differences in opioid-prescribing changes between White and racial minority individuals between state categories.

Conclusions

The study found no clear indication of racial disparities in the impact of medical cannabis policies on opioid prescribing. Future research should focus on access to medical cannabis and prescriber attitudes toward treating racial minority patients experiencing pain with cannabis.
国家医疗大麻政策实施和种族差异在阿片类药物处方在医疗保险受益人:政策影响分析
IntroductionU.S。大麻政策有种族不平等的历史,突出表明需要围绕种族不平等进行研究,特别是在大麻医学化和阿片类药物处方的背景下。本研究评估了州一级医用大麻政策实施与医疗保险受益人阿片类药物处方模式变化之间关系的种族差异。方法利用2012 - 2015年医疗保险索赔数据,将年龄≥65岁的受益人分为医用大麻法律实施州、现有医用大麻法律实施州和非医用大麻法律实施州3大类。采用差异中差异分析来确定种族是否调节了医疗大麻政策实施前后阿片类药物剂量之间的关系。结果共纳入449,336名医疗保险受益人,其中白人387,713人(86.3%),少数族裔61,623人(13.7%)。近一半(49.3%)受益人至少获得了1份阿片类药物处方。白人比少数族裔更有可能接受至少1份阿片类药物处方(49.7% vs 46.8%, p < 0.001)。除了医用大麻合法化州的少数种族个体外,所有州的白人和少数种族个体每月每个患者吗啡毫克当量都显著增加。在各州类别中,白人和少数种族个体的阿片类药物处方变化无显著差异。研究发现,在医用大麻政策对阿片类药物处方的影响方面,没有明显的种族差异迹象。未来的研究应侧重于医用大麻的可及性和处方医师对治疗因大麻而疼痛的少数种族患者的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书