Associations Between Transportation Barriers in the Context of Other Social Needs and Cancer Screening Adherence

IF 2.8
AJPM focus Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-28 DOI:10.1016/j.focus.2025.100385
Anna M. Morenz MD, MPH , Gloria D. Coronado PhD , Lingmei Zhou MS , Celia Valenzuela MD , Joshua M. Liao MD, MSc
{"title":"Associations Between Transportation Barriers in the Context of Other Social Needs and Cancer Screening Adherence","authors":"Anna M. Morenz MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Gloria D. Coronado PhD ,&nbsp;Lingmei Zhou MS ,&nbsp;Celia Valenzuela MD ,&nbsp;Joshua M. Liao MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2025.100385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Socioeconomic inequities in breast and cervical cancer screening persist and may be driven by unmet social needs, such as transportation barriers. The association between transportation barriers and screening adherence, while adjusting for other social needs, remains poorly characterized.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional analysis of 2023 National Health Interview Survey data was conducted from October to December 2024. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between transportation barriers and breast and cervical cancer screening adherence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 5,851 (survey-weighted 42.3 million) and 8,461 (survey-weighted 78.6 million) individuals were eligible for breast and cervical cancer screening, respectively. In adjusted analyses, transportation barriers were associated with lower likelihood of breast cancer screening (AOR=0.6; 95% CI=0.5, 0.9) but no difference in the likelihood of cervical cancer screening (AOR=0.9; 95% CI=0.7, 1.1). Low income, lack of health insurance, and low levels of formal education were also associated with lower adherence for both breast and cervical cancer screening.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>After accounting for other social needs, transportation barriers are associated with lower likelihood of breast cancer screening—an inequity that may benefit from public health and healthcare interventions. Additional work is needed to understand the relationship between SES and cervical cancer screening adherence to inform future interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":"4 5","pages":"Article 100385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065425000732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Socioeconomic inequities in breast and cervical cancer screening persist and may be driven by unmet social needs, such as transportation barriers. The association between transportation barriers and screening adherence, while adjusting for other social needs, remains poorly characterized.

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis of 2023 National Health Interview Survey data was conducted from October to December 2024. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between transportation barriers and breast and cervical cancer screening adherence.

Results

A total of 5,851 (survey-weighted 42.3 million) and 8,461 (survey-weighted 78.6 million) individuals were eligible for breast and cervical cancer screening, respectively. In adjusted analyses, transportation barriers were associated with lower likelihood of breast cancer screening (AOR=0.6; 95% CI=0.5, 0.9) but no difference in the likelihood of cervical cancer screening (AOR=0.9; 95% CI=0.7, 1.1). Low income, lack of health insurance, and low levels of formal education were also associated with lower adherence for both breast and cervical cancer screening.

Conclusion

After accounting for other social needs, transportation barriers are associated with lower likelihood of breast cancer screening—an inequity that may benefit from public health and healthcare interventions. Additional work is needed to understand the relationship between SES and cervical cancer screening adherence to inform future interventions.
其他社会需求背景下的交通障碍与癌症筛查依从性之间的关系
乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查中的社会经济不平等现象持续存在,可能是由于未满足的社会需求(如交通障碍)造成的。交通障碍和筛查依从性之间的联系,在调整其他社会需求的同时,仍然缺乏特征。方法对2024年10月至12月的2023年全国健康访谈调查数据进行横断面分析。多变量logistic回归用于评估交通障碍与乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查依从性之间的关系。结果共有5851人(调查加权4230万人)和8461人(调查加权7860万人)符合乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的条件。在调整分析中,交通障碍与乳腺癌筛查可能性降低相关(AOR=0.6; 95% CI=0.5, 0.9),但与宫颈癌筛查可能性无差异(AOR=0.9; 95% CI=0.7, 1.1)。低收入、缺乏医疗保险和正规教育水平低也与乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查依从性较低有关。在考虑了其他社会需求后,交通障碍与乳腺癌筛查的可能性较低有关,这种不平等可能受益于公共卫生和医疗保健干预。需要进一步的工作来了解SES和宫颈癌筛查依从性之间的关系,以便为未来的干预措施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书