Damalka Balasuryia, Aina Queral-Beltran, Tristan Vick, Scott Simpson, Silvia Lacorte, Diana S. Aga and Alexander C. Hoepker*,
{"title":"Experimental Determination of pKa for 10 PFAS, Mono-, Di-, and Trifluoroacetic Acid by 19F-NMR","authors":"Damalka Balasuryia, Aina Queral-Beltran, Tristan Vick, Scott Simpson, Silvia Lacorte, Diana S. Aga and Alexander C. Hoepker*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Accurate p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> values of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are urgently needed to improve predictions of their environmental fate, bioaccumulation, and removal, yet reliable experimental data remain scarce. Here, we determined the p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> values of 10 PFAS and three short-chain fluorinated acids (MFA: 2.58 ± 0.03; DFA: 1.22 ± 0.03, TFA: 0.03 ± 0.08) using <sup>19</sup>F and <sup>1</sup>H NMR-based chemical shift perturbation. Results were compared to prior experimental values, OPERA predictions (CompTox), and our COSMO-RS calculations. Measured p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> values include PFPrA (−0.18 to −0.54), PFOA (−0.27 ± 0.18), PFBS and PFOS (< −1.85), 6:2 FTS (<0.0), GenX (−0.20 ± 0.09), NFDHA (−0.32 ± 0.18), PFMPA (−0.26 ± 0.13), and 6:2 FTUCA (2.59 ± 0.11). Across C2, C3, and C8 homologues, PFCAs exhibit p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> values of approximately −0.2 to −0.3. Telomerization markedly reduces acidity: 5:3 FTCA (p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> = 4.05 ± 0.04) is >10<sup>4</sup>-fold less acidic than PFOA, with COSMO-RS predicting similar effects from PFOS to 6:2 FTS. The dominant acidifying influence arises from CF<sub>2</sub> groups at C1 and C2 near COOH or SO<sub>3</sub>H. The unusually low p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> values for TFA, PFOA, and GenX reflect our low-MeOH, sorption-resistant NMR method. COSMO-RS consistently outperformed OPERA, underscoring the need for experimental benchmarks to improve predictive models for emerging PFAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":37,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","volume":"12 9","pages":"1238–1246"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00688","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate pKa values of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are urgently needed to improve predictions of their environmental fate, bioaccumulation, and removal, yet reliable experimental data remain scarce. Here, we determined the pKa values of 10 PFAS and three short-chain fluorinated acids (MFA: 2.58 ± 0.03; DFA: 1.22 ± 0.03, TFA: 0.03 ± 0.08) using 19F and 1H NMR-based chemical shift perturbation. Results were compared to prior experimental values, OPERA predictions (CompTox), and our COSMO-RS calculations. Measured pKa values include PFPrA (−0.18 to −0.54), PFOA (−0.27 ± 0.18), PFBS and PFOS (< −1.85), 6:2 FTS (<0.0), GenX (−0.20 ± 0.09), NFDHA (−0.32 ± 0.18), PFMPA (−0.26 ± 0.13), and 6:2 FTUCA (2.59 ± 0.11). Across C2, C3, and C8 homologues, PFCAs exhibit pKa values of approximately −0.2 to −0.3. Telomerization markedly reduces acidity: 5:3 FTCA (pKa = 4.05 ± 0.04) is >104-fold less acidic than PFOA, with COSMO-RS predicting similar effects from PFOS to 6:2 FTS. The dominant acidifying influence arises from CF2 groups at C1 and C2 near COOH or SO3H. The unusually low pKa values for TFA, PFOA, and GenX reflect our low-MeOH, sorption-resistant NMR method. COSMO-RS consistently outperformed OPERA, underscoring the need for experimental benchmarks to improve predictive models for emerging PFAS.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology Letters serves as an international forum for brief communications on experimental or theoretical results of exceptional timeliness in all aspects of environmental science, both pure and applied. Published as soon as accepted, these communications are summarized in monthly issues. Additionally, the journal features short reviews on emerging topics in environmental science and technology.