Grain hardness and protein content as key determinants of barley resistance to Sitophilus granarius Linnaeus, 1758 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Seyed Mehdi Hashemi , Bahram Naseri , Azam Amiri , Ali R. Bandani
{"title":"Grain hardness and protein content as key determinants of barley resistance to Sitophilus granarius Linnaeus, 1758 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)","authors":"Seyed Mehdi Hashemi ,&nbsp;Bahram Naseri ,&nbsp;Azam Amiri ,&nbsp;Ali R. Bandani","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Postharvest infestations by the granary weevil, <em>Sitophilus granarius</em> Linnaeus, 1758 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), pose persistent challenges to barley storage, <em>Hordeum vulgare</em> L. (Poaceae), worldwide. While host plant resistance offers a sustainable control strategy, the mechanisms by which grain traits suppress pest development are still unclear. This study aimed to identify which grain characteristics impair <em>S. granarius</em> performance and to describe the biological cascade by which host traits affect the nutritional physiology and population growth of the pest. Ten barley cultivars differing in grain hardness, protein, starch, and moisture content were evaluated. Pest responses were assessed using life history traits, nutritional indices, and digestive enzyme activity. Marked differences in pest fitness were observed among cultivars. A trait–physiology–performance cascade was used to interpret resistance patterns. Strong negative correlations were found between grain hardness and protein content with fecundity (<em>r</em> = −0.821), intrinsic rate of increase (<em>r</em> = −0.789), and <em>ECI</em> (<em>r</em> = −0.738). Digestive enzyme activity did not correlate with pest success, indicating limited physiological plasticity. These results support a mechanistic model in which grain traits trigger a cascade of physiological impairments, ultimately limiting the fitness of the pest. Barley resistance to <em>S. granarius</em> emerges from sequential biological effects, beginning with grain traits and culminating in reduced population growth. Resistance in specific barley cultivars arises primarily from physical and nutritional characteristics, particularly hardness and protein content, rather than enzymatic interference. This cascade provides a practical and cost-effective approach for resistance screening and cultivar deployment in postharvest IPM systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 107400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002923","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postharvest infestations by the granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius Linnaeus, 1758 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), pose persistent challenges to barley storage, Hordeum vulgare L. (Poaceae), worldwide. While host plant resistance offers a sustainable control strategy, the mechanisms by which grain traits suppress pest development are still unclear. This study aimed to identify which grain characteristics impair S. granarius performance and to describe the biological cascade by which host traits affect the nutritional physiology and population growth of the pest. Ten barley cultivars differing in grain hardness, protein, starch, and moisture content were evaluated. Pest responses were assessed using life history traits, nutritional indices, and digestive enzyme activity. Marked differences in pest fitness were observed among cultivars. A trait–physiology–performance cascade was used to interpret resistance patterns. Strong negative correlations were found between grain hardness and protein content with fecundity (r = −0.821), intrinsic rate of increase (r = −0.789), and ECI (r = −0.738). Digestive enzyme activity did not correlate with pest success, indicating limited physiological plasticity. These results support a mechanistic model in which grain traits trigger a cascade of physiological impairments, ultimately limiting the fitness of the pest. Barley resistance to S. granarius emerges from sequential biological effects, beginning with grain traits and culminating in reduced population growth. Resistance in specific barley cultivars arises primarily from physical and nutritional characteristics, particularly hardness and protein content, rather than enzymatic interference. This cascade provides a practical and cost-effective approach for resistance screening and cultivar deployment in postharvest IPM systems.
籽粒硬度和蛋白质含量对大麦对粗象虫抗性的影响(鞘翅目:粗象科)
摘要粮仓象鼻虫Sitophilus granarius Linnaeus, 1758(鞘翅目:大麦象鼻虫科)的采后侵染对世界范围内的大麦贮藏造成了持续的威胁。虽然寄主植物的抗性提供了一种可持续的控制策略,但谷物性状抑制害虫发展的机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定哪些籽粒性状会影响黑麦的生产性能,并描述寄主性状影响黑麦营养生理和种群生长的生物级联反应。对籽粒硬度、蛋白质、淀粉和水分含量不同的10个大麦品种进行了评价。采用生活史特征、营养指标和消化酶活性评价害虫反应。不同品种间害虫适宜性差异显著。性状-生理-表现级联被用来解释抵抗模式。籽粒硬度、蛋白质含量与繁殖力(r =−0.821)、内在增长率(r =−0.789)、ECI (r =−0.738)呈极显著负相关。消化酶活性与害虫成功与否无关,表明生理可塑性有限。这些结果支持了一个机制模型,其中谷物性状引发了一系列生理损伤,最终限制了害虫的适应性。大麦对小麦黑穗病的抗性来自于一系列的生物效应,从谷物性状开始,最终导致种群增长的减少。特定大麦品种的抗性主要来自物理和营养特性,特别是硬度和蛋白质含量,而不是酶的干扰。这种级联为收获后IPM系统的抗性筛选和品种部署提供了一种实用和经济的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Protection
Crop Protection 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics: -Abiotic damage- Agronomic control methods- Assessment of pest and disease damage- Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases- Biological control- Biorational pesticides- Control of animal pests of world crops- Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms- Control of weeds and integrated management- Economic considerations- Effects of plant growth regulators- Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use- Environmental effects of pesticides- Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control- GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications- Importance and control of postharvest crop losses- Integrated control- Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies- Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection- Pesticide application methods- Pest management- Phytobiomes for pest and disease control- Resistance management- Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信