Objective risk and protective factors for momentary and daily loneliness:using digital phenotyping and temporal analysis.

Matthias Haucke, Stephan Heinzel, Shuyan Liu
{"title":"Objective risk and protective factors for momentary and daily loneliness:using digital phenotyping and temporal analysis.","authors":"Matthias Haucke, Stephan Heinzel, Shuyan Liu","doi":"10.1038/s44184-025-00148-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Loneliness is a growing global health issue, yet real-time assessments of its objective risk and protective factors are limited. This study identifies momentary and daily predictors using digital phenotyping and temporal analysis. Analyzing 12788 momentary observations from social mobile sensing and actigraphy, we examined how they impact loneliness on average (between-person) and in daily fluctuations (within-person). Instant messenger app usage was associated with increased loneliness, both momentarily (B = 2.95, p = 0.017) and daily (B = 2.83, p = 0.018), within and between subjects. Social media usage was associated with higher within-person momentary loneliness (B = 0.53, p = 0.001). An exploratory network analysis suggested that physical activity is associated with in-person social interaction, which is negatively associated with loneliness, while social media may replace social interactions. Thus, objective risk factors include increased use of social media and instant messaging, whereas greater physical activity may serve as a protective factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":74321,"journal":{"name":"Npj mental health research","volume":"4 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Npj mental health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-025-00148-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loneliness is a growing global health issue, yet real-time assessments of its objective risk and protective factors are limited. This study identifies momentary and daily predictors using digital phenotyping and temporal analysis. Analyzing 12788 momentary observations from social mobile sensing and actigraphy, we examined how they impact loneliness on average (between-person) and in daily fluctuations (within-person). Instant messenger app usage was associated with increased loneliness, both momentarily (B = 2.95, p = 0.017) and daily (B = 2.83, p = 0.018), within and between subjects. Social media usage was associated with higher within-person momentary loneliness (B = 0.53, p = 0.001). An exploratory network analysis suggested that physical activity is associated with in-person social interaction, which is negatively associated with loneliness, while social media may replace social interactions. Thus, objective risk factors include increased use of social media and instant messaging, whereas greater physical activity may serve as a protective factor.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

瞬间和日常孤独的客观风险和保护因素:使用数字表型和时间分析。
孤独是一个日益严重的全球健康问题,但对其客观风险和保护因素的实时评估有限。本研究利用数字表型和时间分析确定了瞬时和每日预测因子。我们分析了12788个来自社交移动传感和活动仪的瞬间观察,研究了它们如何影响平均(人与人之间)和日常波动(人与人之间)的孤独感。即时通讯应用程序的使用与受试者内部和受试者之间的孤独感增加有关,无论是瞬间(B = 2.95, p = 0.017)还是每日(B = 2.83, p = 0.018)。社交媒体的使用与较高的人际瞬间孤独感相关(B = 0.53, p = 0.001)。探索性网络分析表明,体育活动与面对面的社交互动相关,而面对面的社交互动与孤独感呈负相关,而社交媒体可能取代社交互动。因此,客观的风险因素包括社交媒体和即时通讯的使用增加,而更多的体育活动可能是一个保护因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信