Predictors of Final Place of Care in People With Advanced Dementia Receiving Home-Based Palliative Care in Singapore: A Multivariate Regression Analysis.

IF 2.2
RiYin Tay, Allyn YinMei Hum, Mervyn YongHwang Koh, Jane Simpson, Nancy Preston
{"title":"Predictors of Final Place of Care in People With Advanced Dementia Receiving Home-Based Palliative Care in Singapore: A Multivariate Regression Analysis.","authors":"RiYin Tay, Allyn YinMei Hum, Mervyn YongHwang Koh, Jane Simpson, Nancy Preston","doi":"10.1177/14713012251376769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the prevalence of dementia rises exponentially globally, instituting practices to support the dying process of people affected by dementia is a public health priority. However, end-of-life quality indicators such as place of death provide limited information about the totality of the dying process. Hence, this study's aim was to identify factors affecting the relatively understudied concept of final place of care (where care was received in the last three days of life i.e. home/inpatient hospice/hospital) and its concordance with previously stated preferences (goal-concordance). A retrospective cohort study was conducted using secondary data (electronic medical records) from 284 individuals enrolled in a home-based palliative care service for people with advanced dementia in Singapore. Despite demonstrating positive impacts, the service was unable to meet some individuals' end-of-life preferences. Analysis used multivariate binomial logistic regression, concordance and sensitivity analyses. Results found home to be the most common final place of care (81.7%). Better biological and functional status, and inconsistent preferences for place of care and death predicted hospital admission for care (9.2%). Discomfort, oral feeding, psychosocial challenges, and family unemployment predicted inpatient hospice admissions (9.2%); these were often late and unplanned, suggesting a preference for home until death was imminent. Better prognosis, infection two weeks before death/admission, higher caregiver burden and psychosocial challenges predicted non-concordance with preferences (14.4%). The results highlight the unpredictable, protracted trajectory of people with advanced dementia and the multifaceted challenges of end-of-life care and death. Unlike place of death, relatively stable factors (sociodemographic, chronic comorbidities) had no effect on final place of care. These fresh insights, supported by findings about end-of-life transitions in international literature, have implications for policies and practices to advance the global health goal of facilitating people with advanced dementia not just to die but to spend their final days at their place of choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251376769"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251376769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the prevalence of dementia rises exponentially globally, instituting practices to support the dying process of people affected by dementia is a public health priority. However, end-of-life quality indicators such as place of death provide limited information about the totality of the dying process. Hence, this study's aim was to identify factors affecting the relatively understudied concept of final place of care (where care was received in the last three days of life i.e. home/inpatient hospice/hospital) and its concordance with previously stated preferences (goal-concordance). A retrospective cohort study was conducted using secondary data (electronic medical records) from 284 individuals enrolled in a home-based palliative care service for people with advanced dementia in Singapore. Despite demonstrating positive impacts, the service was unable to meet some individuals' end-of-life preferences. Analysis used multivariate binomial logistic regression, concordance and sensitivity analyses. Results found home to be the most common final place of care (81.7%). Better biological and functional status, and inconsistent preferences for place of care and death predicted hospital admission for care (9.2%). Discomfort, oral feeding, psychosocial challenges, and family unemployment predicted inpatient hospice admissions (9.2%); these were often late and unplanned, suggesting a preference for home until death was imminent. Better prognosis, infection two weeks before death/admission, higher caregiver burden and psychosocial challenges predicted non-concordance with preferences (14.4%). The results highlight the unpredictable, protracted trajectory of people with advanced dementia and the multifaceted challenges of end-of-life care and death. Unlike place of death, relatively stable factors (sociodemographic, chronic comorbidities) had no effect on final place of care. These fresh insights, supported by findings about end-of-life transitions in international literature, have implications for policies and practices to advance the global health goal of facilitating people with advanced dementia not just to die but to spend their final days at their place of choice.

新加坡晚期痴呆症患者接受家庭姑息治疗的最终护理地点的预测因素:多变量回归分析。
随着全球痴呆症患病率呈指数级上升,制定支持痴呆症患者死亡过程的做法是公共卫生的一项优先事项。然而,诸如死亡地点等临终质量指标提供的有关死亡过程整体的信息有限。因此,本研究的目的是找出影响最终照护地点(在生命最后三天接受照护的地方,即家庭/住院安宁疗护/医院)概念的因素,以及它与先前陈述的偏好的一致性(目标一致性)。一项回顾性队列研究使用辅助数据(电子医疗记录),来自284名在新加坡为晚期痴呆症患者提供居家姑息治疗服务的患者。尽管显示出积极的影响,但这项服务无法满足一些人的临终偏好。分析采用多元二项逻辑回归、一致性分析和敏感性分析。结果发现,家中是最常见的最终护理场所(81.7%)。更好的生物学和功能状态,以及对护理地点和死亡不一致的偏好预测了住院治疗(9.2%)。不适、口腔喂养、心理社会挑战和家庭失业预测住院病人安宁疗护入院(9.2%);这些行为通常很晚,而且是计划外的,这表明在死亡迫在眉睫之前,他们更喜欢回家。预后较好、死亡/入院前两周感染、较高的照顾者负担和心理社会挑战预示着偏好不一致(14.4%)。研究结果强调了晚期痴呆症患者不可预测的、长期的发展轨迹,以及临终关怀和死亡的多方面挑战。与死亡地点不同,相对稳定的因素(社会人口统计学、慢性合并症)对最终护理地点没有影响。这些新的见解得到了国际文献中关于生命末期过渡的研究结果的支持,对促进促进晚期痴呆症患者死亡并在他们选择的地方度过最后几天的全球健康目标的政策和实践具有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信