In older adults resting-state alpha power is associated with stronger effects of anodal tDCS over prefrontal cortex on dynamic balance.

IF 2.4
Hadis Imani, Ben Godde
{"title":"In older adults resting-state alpha power is associated with stronger effects of anodal tDCS over prefrontal cortex on dynamic balance.","authors":"Hadis Imani, Ben Godde","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.08.075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Age-related declines in dynamic balance and cognitive control increase fall risk in older adults (OA). Non-invasive brain stimulation, such as anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS), may enhance training outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether stimulation over motor or prefrontal regions is more effective for improving dynamic balance training (DBT) in OA.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of a-tDCS over the primary motor cortex (M1) vs. dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on DBT performance and transfer to static balance in OA, and to explore whether baseline resting-state EEG predicts training outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized crossover design, 18 healthy OA completed DBT training during three stimulation conditions (M1, DLPFC, and sham). Static balance performance was assessed before and after training. Resting-state EEG was recorded to assess predictors of training success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DBT performance improved significantly more with DLPFC stimulation than with M1 or sham. Negative transfer effects were observed on untrained static balance tasks. Lower baseline alpha power predicted stronger training gains with DLPFC stimulation but weaker gains with M1 stimulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DLPFC-targeted a-tDCS enhances DBT in OA more effectively than M1 stimulation. Baseline oscillatory brain activity may inform individualized stimulation protocols to optimize balance training outcomes in OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.08.075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Age-related declines in dynamic balance and cognitive control increase fall risk in older adults (OA). Non-invasive brain stimulation, such as anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS), may enhance training outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether stimulation over motor or prefrontal regions is more effective for improving dynamic balance training (DBT) in OA.

Objective: To compare the effects of a-tDCS over the primary motor cortex (M1) vs. dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on DBT performance and transfer to static balance in OA, and to explore whether baseline resting-state EEG predicts training outcomes.

Methods: In a randomized crossover design, 18 healthy OA completed DBT training during three stimulation conditions (M1, DLPFC, and sham). Static balance performance was assessed before and after training. Resting-state EEG was recorded to assess predictors of training success.

Results: DBT performance improved significantly more with DLPFC stimulation than with M1 or sham. Negative transfer effects were observed on untrained static balance tasks. Lower baseline alpha power predicted stronger training gains with DLPFC stimulation but weaker gains with M1 stimulation.

Conclusion: DLPFC-targeted a-tDCS enhances DBT in OA more effectively than M1 stimulation. Baseline oscillatory brain activity may inform individualized stimulation protocols to optimize balance training outcomes in OA.

在老年人中,静息状态α功率与前额叶皮层阳极tDCS对动态平衡的更强影响有关。
背景:与年龄相关的动态平衡和认知控制能力下降会增加老年人(OA)跌倒的风险。无创脑刺激,如阳极经颅直流电刺激(a-tDCS),可以提高训练效果。然而,目前尚不清楚刺激运动区还是前额叶区对改善OA患者的动态平衡训练(DBT)更有效。目的:比较a-tDCS在初级运动皮层(M1)和背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)上对OA患者DBT表现和向静态平衡转移的影响,并探讨基线静息状态EEG是否能预测训练结果。方法:在随机交叉设计中,18名健康OA在三种刺激条件下(M1、DLPFC和假手术)完成了DBT训练。在训练前后评估静平衡性能。静息状态脑电图记录以评估训练成功的预测因素。结果:与M1或假手术相比,DLPFC刺激显著改善了DBT的表现。在未经训练的静态平衡任务中观察到负迁移效应。较低的基线阿尔法功率预示着DLPFC刺激的训练增益更强,而M1刺激的训练增益较弱。结论:dlpfc靶向的a-tDCS比M1刺激更有效地增强OA的DBT。基线振荡脑活动可以为个体化刺激方案提供信息,以优化OA患者的平衡训练结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信