Multi-segment models for kinetic analysis of women during pregnancy: A systematic review.

IF 2.4
Jie Chen, Xin Li, Patria A Hume, Hannah Wyatt, Julie Choisne
{"title":"Multi-segment models for kinetic analysis of women during pregnancy: A systematic review.","authors":"Jie Chen, Xin Li, Patria A Hume, Hannah Wyatt, Julie Choisne","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.08.082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During pregnancy, significant physiological, morphological, and hormonal changes profoundly affect women's biomechanics, increasing the risk of falls and musculoskeletal complaints, especially in the third trimester. To understand movement adaptations and musculoskeletal disorders in pregnant women, kinetic analysis using pregnant-specific multi-segment or musculoskeletal models is essential. This review aims to evaluate the development, applications and limitations of such models intended for kinetic analysis in pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore databases were searched systematically for kinetic studies involving the pregnant-specific multi-segment models. Quality assessment was completed to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 different pregnant-specific multi-segment models (including musculoskeletal models) used within 19 kinetic studies were included in this review. Currently, most scaling methods are marker-based and limited by pregnancy-related soft tissue artifacts. Segment inertial parameter estimations were largely based on regression models, which may not adequately capture the high degree of individual variability among pregnant women. Most existing models focus on analyzing lower-limb or lumbar kinetics during daily activities, yet many remain unvalidated and lack detailed lumbopelvic representations. Pregnant-specific musculoskeletal models are scarce and primarily rely on static optimization for lumbar muscle force estimation, which overlooks trunk co-contraction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future research should focus on developing more detailed and validated pregnant-specific models, alongside advanced workflows for more accurate model personalization, to more accurately capture the biomechanical changes across different pregnancy stages and support clinically relevant kinetic analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.08.082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During pregnancy, significant physiological, morphological, and hormonal changes profoundly affect women's biomechanics, increasing the risk of falls and musculoskeletal complaints, especially in the third trimester. To understand movement adaptations and musculoskeletal disorders in pregnant women, kinetic analysis using pregnant-specific multi-segment or musculoskeletal models is essential. This review aims to evaluate the development, applications and limitations of such models intended for kinetic analysis in pregnancy.

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore databases were searched systematically for kinetic studies involving the pregnant-specific multi-segment models. Quality assessment was completed to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies.

Results: A total of 14 different pregnant-specific multi-segment models (including musculoskeletal models) used within 19 kinetic studies were included in this review. Currently, most scaling methods are marker-based and limited by pregnancy-related soft tissue artifacts. Segment inertial parameter estimations were largely based on regression models, which may not adequately capture the high degree of individual variability among pregnant women. Most existing models focus on analyzing lower-limb or lumbar kinetics during daily activities, yet many remain unvalidated and lack detailed lumbopelvic representations. Pregnant-specific musculoskeletal models are scarce and primarily rely on static optimization for lumbar muscle force estimation, which overlooks trunk co-contraction.

Conclusion: Future research should focus on developing more detailed and validated pregnant-specific models, alongside advanced workflows for more accurate model personalization, to more accurately capture the biomechanical changes across different pregnancy stages and support clinically relevant kinetic analysis.

孕期妇女动力学分析的多段模型:系统综述。
背景:在怀孕期间,显著的生理、形态和激素变化深刻地影响了女性的生物力学,增加了跌倒和肌肉骨骼疾病的风险,特别是在妊娠晚期。为了了解孕妇的运动适应和肌肉骨骼疾病,使用妊娠特异性多节段或肌肉骨骼模型进行动力学分析是必不可少的。本文综述了这些用于妊娠动力学分析的模型的发展、应用和局限性。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明,系统地检索PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus和IEEE Xplore数据库,寻找涉及妊娠特异性多段模型的动力学研究。完成质量评估以评估所选研究的方法学质量。结果:本综述共纳入了19项动力学研究中使用的14种不同的妊娠特异性多节段模型(包括肌肉骨骼模型)。目前,大多数缩放方法都是基于标记的,并且受到与妊娠相关的软组织伪影的限制。部分惯性参数估计主要基于回归模型,这可能无法充分捕捉孕妇之间的高度个体变异性。大多数现有模型侧重于分析日常活动中的下肢或腰椎动力学,但许多模型仍未得到验证,并且缺乏详细的腰骨盆表征。妊娠特异性肌肉骨骼模型很少,主要依赖于静态优化的腰肌力估计,忽略了躯干的共同收缩。结论:未来的研究应侧重于开发更详细和有效的妊娠特异性模型,以及更精确的模型个性化先进的工作流程,以更准确地捕捉不同妊娠阶段的生物力学变化,并支持临床相关的动力学分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信