Preliminary Functional Outcome Following Robotic Intracorporeal Orthotopic Ileal Neobladder with Integrated Pelvic Fascial Structure-Sparing in Males with Bladder Cancer.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Xin Xu, Zhen Liang, Yanfei Feng, Honggang Qi, Shuo Wang, Dan Xia, Ping Wang
{"title":"Preliminary Functional Outcome Following Robotic Intracorporeal Orthotopic Ileal Neobladder with Integrated Pelvic Fascial Structure-Sparing in Males with Bladder Cancer.","authors":"Xin Xu, Zhen Liang, Yanfei Feng, Honggang Qi, Shuo Wang, Dan Xia, Ping Wang","doi":"10.22037/uj.v22i.8450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe our integrated pelvic fascial structure-sparing (IPFSS) technique for robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction and to evaluate its impact on urinary continence and sexual function in male patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study was conducted at a single high-volume center. Male bladder cancer patients who underwent IPFSS RARC with ONB were included. Demographic, clinical, and pathological data were collected. Functional outcomes were evaluated and compared with a cohort of patients who underwent conventional non-nerve-sparing RARC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six patients were included in the IPFSS group and 42 in the conventional group. RARC with intracorporeal urinary diversion was successfully completed in all patients without open conversion. The mean total operative time was 387.9 minutes in the IPFSS group and 392.0 minutes in the conventional group (p = 0.465). At 3 months post-surgery, 30 patients (83%) in the IPFSS group achieved daytime continence (0-1 pads), compared to 14 patients (33%) in the conventional group. By 6 months, daytime continence increased to 35 patients (97%) in the IPFSS group, while 28 patients (67%) in the conventional group achieved similar results. At 6 months, 30 patients (83%) in the IPFSS group reported full potency with or without phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, compared to only 3 patients (7%) in the conventional group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present a feasible surgical technique for RARC that involves holistic preservation of the pelvic fascial architecture. This approach is associated with a rapid recovery of daytime continence and sexual function in male patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23416,"journal":{"name":"Urology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v22i.8450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe our integrated pelvic fascial structure-sparing (IPFSS) technique for robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction and to evaluate its impact on urinary continence and sexual function in male patients.

Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at a single high-volume center. Male bladder cancer patients who underwent IPFSS RARC with ONB were included. Demographic, clinical, and pathological data were collected. Functional outcomes were evaluated and compared with a cohort of patients who underwent conventional non-nerve-sparing RARC.

Results: Thirty-six patients were included in the IPFSS group and 42 in the conventional group. RARC with intracorporeal urinary diversion was successfully completed in all patients without open conversion. The mean total operative time was 387.9 minutes in the IPFSS group and 392.0 minutes in the conventional group (p = 0.465). At 3 months post-surgery, 30 patients (83%) in the IPFSS group achieved daytime continence (0-1 pads), compared to 14 patients (33%) in the conventional group. By 6 months, daytime continence increased to 35 patients (97%) in the IPFSS group, while 28 patients (67%) in the conventional group achieved similar results. At 6 months, 30 patients (83%) in the IPFSS group reported full potency with or without phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, compared to only 3 patients (7%) in the conventional group.

Conclusion: We present a feasible surgical technique for RARC that involves holistic preservation of the pelvic fascial architecture. This approach is associated with a rapid recovery of daytime continence and sexual function in male patients.

保留完整骨盆筋膜结构的机器人体内原位回肠新膀胱治疗男性膀胱癌的初步功能结局。
目的:描述我们在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)联合体内原位新膀胱(ONB)重建中的盆腔筋膜结构保留(IPFSS)技术,并评估其对男性患者尿失禁和性功能的影响。方法:本回顾性观察研究在单个高容量中心进行。接受IPFSS RARC合并ONB的男性膀胱癌患者被纳入研究对象。收集了人口学、临床和病理资料。功能结果进行评估,并与接受常规非保留神经RARC的患者队列进行比较。结果:IPFSS组36例,常规组42例。所有患者均成功完成RARC伴体内尿转流,无开放性尿转流。IPFSS组平均总手术时间387.9 min,常规组平均总手术时间392.0 min (p = 0.465)。术后3个月,IPFSS组30例(83%)患者实现了白天尿失禁(0-1个尿垫),而常规组为14例(33%)。6个月时,IPFSS组白天尿失禁患者增加到35例(97%),而常规组28例(67%)患者的结果相似。在6个月时,IPFSS组中有30名患者(83%)报告了使用或不使用5型磷酸二酯酶(PDE5)抑制剂的充分效力,而传统组只有3名患者(7%)报告了充分效力。结论:我们提出了一种可行的RARC手术技术,包括骨盆筋膜结构的整体保存。这种方法与男性患者日间尿失禁和性功能的快速恢复有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Journal
Urology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Urology and Nephrology Research Center (UNRC) and the Iranian Urological Association (IUA), Urology Journal is a comprehensive digest of useful information on modern urology. Emphasis is on practical information that reflects the latest diagnostic and treatment techniques. Our objectives are to provide an exceptional source of current and clinically relevant research in the discipline of urology, to reflect the scientific work and progress of our colleagues, and to present the articles in a logical, timely, and concise format that meets the diverse needs of today’s urologist. Urology Journal publishes manuscripts on urology and kidney transplantation, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. Accordingly, original articles, case reports, and letters to editor are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信