Perception of Visual Illusions in Children and Teenagers With ADHD.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Valeria Montiel, Vania Navarrete, Ana M González-Pérez, Carolina Vázquez de Alba, Ricardo Díaz-Sánchez, Péter Szenczi, Marcos Rosetti, Rosa E Ulloa, Oxána Bánszegi
{"title":"Perception of Visual Illusions in Children and Teenagers With ADHD.","authors":"Valeria Montiel, Vania Navarrete, Ana M González-Pérez, Carolina Vázquez de Alba, Ricardo Díaz-Sánchez, Péter Szenczi, Marcos Rosetti, Rosa E Ulloa, Oxána Bánszegi","doi":"10.1177/10870547251369665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Susceptibility to visual illusions is a consequence of the adaptation of the visual system, however, their perception or lack of it reflects differences in more general, global cognitive processes. Few studies have focussed on the susceptibility of individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), even though visual impairment and percept differences have been thoroughly documented.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The present study evaluated 75 children (ages 6.09-12.99 years, 72% male) and 37 teenagers (ages 13-16.95 years, 62% male) with ADHD, and a sex-and-age matched sample of typically developing peers. They were tested with 103 pairs of illusory and control images spanning five illusion types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found increased susceptibility to the Müller-Lyer and Kanizsa Subjective Contour and decreased susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus illusion among children with ADHD when compared to typically developing controls. No differences were found for susceptibility to the Simultaneous Contrast and Moving Snake illusions. As for reaction times, we did not find differences between participants with ADHD and their control peers when judging illusions; however, in general participants give answers faster in the illusory trials than in control trials with the same magnitude of difficulties which also confirm the susceptibility of the illusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings point to small but important perceptual alterations, such as slightly reduced or delayed top-down or global processing ability in children with ADHD. Further research can focus on how these alterations may be useful to detect developmental alterations and understand perceptual difficulties in children with neuropathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"10870547251369665"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Attention Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547251369665","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Susceptibility to visual illusions is a consequence of the adaptation of the visual system, however, their perception or lack of it reflects differences in more general, global cognitive processes. Few studies have focussed on the susceptibility of individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), even though visual impairment and percept differences have been thoroughly documented.

Method: The present study evaluated 75 children (ages 6.09-12.99 years, 72% male) and 37 teenagers (ages 13-16.95 years, 62% male) with ADHD, and a sex-and-age matched sample of typically developing peers. They were tested with 103 pairs of illusory and control images spanning five illusion types.

Results: We found increased susceptibility to the Müller-Lyer and Kanizsa Subjective Contour and decreased susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus illusion among children with ADHD when compared to typically developing controls. No differences were found for susceptibility to the Simultaneous Contrast and Moving Snake illusions. As for reaction times, we did not find differences between participants with ADHD and their control peers when judging illusions; however, in general participants give answers faster in the illusory trials than in control trials with the same magnitude of difficulties which also confirm the susceptibility of the illusions.

Conclusion: Our findings point to small but important perceptual alterations, such as slightly reduced or delayed top-down or global processing ability in children with ADHD. Further research can focus on how these alterations may be useful to detect developmental alterations and understand perceptual difficulties in children with neuropathology.

儿童与青少年ADHD的视错觉知觉。
目的:视觉错觉的易感性是视觉系统适应的结果,然而,它们的感知或缺乏反映了更普遍的全球认知过程的差异。很少有研究集中在患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的个体的易感性上,尽管视觉障碍和感知差异已经被彻底记录下来。方法:本研究对75例ADHD儿童(6.09 ~ 12.99岁,男性占72%)和37例青少年(13 ~ 16.95岁,男性占62%)以及性别年龄匹配的典型发育同伴进行评估。他们被测试了103对幻觉和对照图像,包括五种错觉类型。结果:与正常发育的对照组相比,我们发现ADHD儿童对 ller- lyer和Kanizsa主观轮廓的易感性增加,对艾宾浩斯错觉的易感性降低。同时对比错觉和移动蛇错觉的敏感性没有差异。至于反应时间,我们没有发现ADHD参与者和对照组在判断幻觉时的差异;然而,总的来说,在相同难度的情况下,参与者在幻觉试验中给出答案的速度比在对照试验中更快,这也证实了幻觉的易感性。结论:我们的研究结果指出了微小但重要的感知改变,例如ADHD儿童自上而下或全局处理能力的轻微降低或延迟。进一步的研究可以集中在这些变化如何有助于检测发育变化和理解神经病理学儿童的感知困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Attention Disorders (JAD) focuses on basic and applied science concerning attention and related functions in children, adolescents, and adults. JAD publishes articles on diagnosis, comorbidity, neuropsychological functioning, psychopharmacology, and psychosocial issues. The journal also addresses practice, policy, and theory, as well as review articles, commentaries, in-depth analyses, empirical research articles, and case presentations or program evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信