Synergistic effect of enzymatic deproteinization and surface pre-reacted glass ionomer “SPRG” fillers in self-etch adhesives: Boosting anti-demineralization and ABRZ
{"title":"Synergistic effect of enzymatic deproteinization and surface pre-reacted glass ionomer “SPRG” fillers in self-etch adhesives: Boosting anti-demineralization and ABRZ","authors":"Citra Kusumasari , Ratna Meidyawati , Iffi Aprillia , A’an Mi’dad Arrizza , Natasya Hillary , Ahmed Abdou","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>to evaluate the effect of smear-layer deproteinization using papain gel and SPRG-adhesive on marginal-gap, anti-demineralization of enamel and dentin after chemical pH cycling and assess acid-base resistance zone (ABRZ) characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cylindrical cavities were prepared cervically in thirty-two extracted premolars. Teeth were divided into two pretreatment groups (<em>n</em> = 16); deproteinization with papain enzyme gel (Papacarie Duo, Brazil) for 60 s, and no-deproteinization. Each group was subdivided by adhesive type (<em>n</em> = 8); SPRG-based (FL Bond II, Shofu, Japan), and Silica-based (Clearfil SE Bond 2, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Japan). Cavities were restored with flowable composite, followed by a 4-day pH-cycling (6 h demineralization and 18 h remineralization). Specimens were immersed in Rhodamine B, sectioned perpendicularly and evaluated by confocal laser scanning microscopy for wall lesion depth (WLD), outer lesion depth (OLD), complete demineralization, and the marginal-gap length. ABRZ ultrastructure and thickness were assessed using scanning electron microscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For enamel, The silica-based adhesive exhibited a significantly higher WLD, OLD and complete demineralization compared to SPRG-based adhesive in both pretreatment conditions (<em>p</em> < 0.05) while insignificant difference in the marginal-gap depth between groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05). For Dentin, complete demineralization and marginal-gap were significantly higher for silica-based adhesive without deproteinization compared to SPRG-based adhesive with deproteinization (<em>p</em> < 0.05). Deproteinization increased ABRZ thickness in both adhesives.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SPRG-based adhesive enhances resistance to demineralization during acidic challenge at the mid-/high-micron levels, While enzymatic smear layer deproteinization using papain gel increases the thickness of ABRZ at the micron level.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><div>A simple chairside protocol that combines papain-based smear-layer deproteinization with SPRG-based self-etch adhesive may enhance interfacial demineralization resistance. This synergy could reduce marginal gaps and demineralization at restoration borders, thereby lowering the risk of secondary caries and extending restoration longevity in practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 106088"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571225005342","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
to evaluate the effect of smear-layer deproteinization using papain gel and SPRG-adhesive on marginal-gap, anti-demineralization of enamel and dentin after chemical pH cycling and assess acid-base resistance zone (ABRZ) characteristics.
Methods
Cylindrical cavities were prepared cervically in thirty-two extracted premolars. Teeth were divided into two pretreatment groups (n = 16); deproteinization with papain enzyme gel (Papacarie Duo, Brazil) for 60 s, and no-deproteinization. Each group was subdivided by adhesive type (n = 8); SPRG-based (FL Bond II, Shofu, Japan), and Silica-based (Clearfil SE Bond 2, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Japan). Cavities were restored with flowable composite, followed by a 4-day pH-cycling (6 h demineralization and 18 h remineralization). Specimens were immersed in Rhodamine B, sectioned perpendicularly and evaluated by confocal laser scanning microscopy for wall lesion depth (WLD), outer lesion depth (OLD), complete demineralization, and the marginal-gap length. ABRZ ultrastructure and thickness were assessed using scanning electron microscopy.
Results
For enamel, The silica-based adhesive exhibited a significantly higher WLD, OLD and complete demineralization compared to SPRG-based adhesive in both pretreatment conditions (p < 0.05) while insignificant difference in the marginal-gap depth between groups (p > 0.05). For Dentin, complete demineralization and marginal-gap were significantly higher for silica-based adhesive without deproteinization compared to SPRG-based adhesive with deproteinization (p < 0.05). Deproteinization increased ABRZ thickness in both adhesives.
Conclusions
SPRG-based adhesive enhances resistance to demineralization during acidic challenge at the mid-/high-micron levels, While enzymatic smear layer deproteinization using papain gel increases the thickness of ABRZ at the micron level.
Clinical significance
A simple chairside protocol that combines papain-based smear-layer deproteinization with SPRG-based self-etch adhesive may enhance interfacial demineralization resistance. This synergy could reduce marginal gaps and demineralization at restoration borders, thereby lowering the risk of secondary caries and extending restoration longevity in practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis.
Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research.
The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.