Exploring why adolescents of disadvantaged family socio-economic status were more depressed than others: Serial mediations via personal psychological resources, loneliness, and school refusal functions.
Yanqiu Yu, Juliet Honglei Chen, Anise M S Wu, Guohua Zhang, Dong-Wu Xu, Xinwei Lyu, Deborah Baofeng Wang, Mengni Du, Joseph T F Lau
{"title":"Exploring why adolescents of disadvantaged family socio-economic status were more depressed than others: Serial mediations via personal psychological resources, loneliness, and school refusal functions.","authors":"Yanqiu Yu, Juliet Honglei Chen, Anise M S Wu, Guohua Zhang, Dong-Wu Xu, Xinwei Lyu, Deborah Baofeng Wang, Mengni Du, Joseph T F Lau","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.120220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disadvantageous family socio-economic status (DFSES) is a potential source of disparity in adolescent mental health. This study investigated the association between DFSES and probable depression and its mediation mechanisms via personal psychological resources (hope and resilience), loneliness, and school refusal functions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A school-based anonymous survey was conducted among 8285 middle school students in China from February to March 2022; the response/eligible rate was 98.6 %/88.4 % (n = 8169/7321). The DFSES index counted the number of five unfavorable conditions (not living with both parents, either the father's or the mother's education level was primary school or below, self-reported poor/very poor household financial situation, and single-parent family). Probable depression was defined as the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire score ≥ 10.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of probable depression was 18.9 %. The proportions endorsing nil/1/2/≥3 DFSES conditions were 49.4 %/30.4 %/15.1 %/5.1 %. Adjusting for age and sex, DFSES was positively associated with probable depression. Such an association was fully mediated by three 2-step indirect paths (via personal psychological resources of hope and resilience, loneliness, and school refusal functions, respectively) and two 3-step serial mediation (via personal psychological resources then school refusal functions, and via loneliness and then school refusal); the mediation effect size ranged from 8.8 % to 23.5 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DFSES was a significant factor of adolescent depression. Modifications of the personal psychological resources of hope and resilience, loneliness, and school refusal functions might mitigate such potentially harmful effects of DFSES. Future longitudinal and intervention studies are warranted to verify the findings and reduce adolescent depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"120220"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.120220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Disadvantageous family socio-economic status (DFSES) is a potential source of disparity in adolescent mental health. This study investigated the association between DFSES and probable depression and its mediation mechanisms via personal psychological resources (hope and resilience), loneliness, and school refusal functions.
Methods: A school-based anonymous survey was conducted among 8285 middle school students in China from February to March 2022; the response/eligible rate was 98.6 %/88.4 % (n = 8169/7321). The DFSES index counted the number of five unfavorable conditions (not living with both parents, either the father's or the mother's education level was primary school or below, self-reported poor/very poor household financial situation, and single-parent family). Probable depression was defined as the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire score ≥ 10.
Results: The prevalence of probable depression was 18.9 %. The proportions endorsing nil/1/2/≥3 DFSES conditions were 49.4 %/30.4 %/15.1 %/5.1 %. Adjusting for age and sex, DFSES was positively associated with probable depression. Such an association was fully mediated by three 2-step indirect paths (via personal psychological resources of hope and resilience, loneliness, and school refusal functions, respectively) and two 3-step serial mediation (via personal psychological resources then school refusal functions, and via loneliness and then school refusal); the mediation effect size ranged from 8.8 % to 23.5 %.
Conclusions: DFSES was a significant factor of adolescent depression. Modifications of the personal psychological resources of hope and resilience, loneliness, and school refusal functions might mitigate such potentially harmful effects of DFSES. Future longitudinal and intervention studies are warranted to verify the findings and reduce adolescent depression.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
