Michele Savino, Lisa De Luca, Annalaura Nocentini, Ersilia Menesini
{"title":"Intergenerational interventions and their impact on active aging: A systematic review.","authors":"Michele Savino, Lisa De Luca, Annalaura Nocentini, Ersilia Menesini","doi":"10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aging of the world's population has led to a growing need for innovative strategies to promote active aging and bridge generational divides. Intergenerational Programs (IGPs) that engage young adults (18-30 years) and older adults (65 + years) have demonstrated the potential to improve well-being and reduce ageism. However, the evidence for this pairing of ages is still fragmentary. This review aims to provide a qualitative and systematic synthesis of present IGPs, deepening the main characteristics of their implementations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ERIC) were systematically searched following PRISMA guidelines. After screening 5554 articles, two independent reviewers assessed full texts, and 26 studies were included and systematically coded for narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study results indicate that IGPs consistently improve mental health, social inclusion, and community cohesion and reduce ageism for both age groups. Most studies (77 %) reported positive outcomes for both generations, while 19 % showed benefits exclusively for older adults. Interventions are diverse, including educational, community, meaningful activity, physical activity, reminiscence, and technology programs. Relational dynamics (61.5 %) and ageism reduction (54 %) emerged as primary outcome focuses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite these strengths, variability in theoretical frameworks and methods limits comparability. These findings highlight the potential of IGPs to promote intergenerational solidarity and suggest that future research should prioritize standardized approach and balanced evaluations to strengthen the evidence base and guide effective practice in an aging society.</p>","PeriodicalId":14368,"journal":{"name":"International psychogeriatrics","volume":" ","pages":"100142"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The aging of the world's population has led to a growing need for innovative strategies to promote active aging and bridge generational divides. Intergenerational Programs (IGPs) that engage young adults (18-30 years) and older adults (65 + years) have demonstrated the potential to improve well-being and reduce ageism. However, the evidence for this pairing of ages is still fragmentary. This review aims to provide a qualitative and systematic synthesis of present IGPs, deepening the main characteristics of their implementations.
Methods: Four databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ERIC) were systematically searched following PRISMA guidelines. After screening 5554 articles, two independent reviewers assessed full texts, and 26 studies were included and systematically coded for narrative synthesis.
Results: The study results indicate that IGPs consistently improve mental health, social inclusion, and community cohesion and reduce ageism for both age groups. Most studies (77 %) reported positive outcomes for both generations, while 19 % showed benefits exclusively for older adults. Interventions are diverse, including educational, community, meaningful activity, physical activity, reminiscence, and technology programs. Relational dynamics (61.5 %) and ageism reduction (54 %) emerged as primary outcome focuses.
Conclusions: Despite these strengths, variability in theoretical frameworks and methods limits comparability. These findings highlight the potential of IGPs to promote intergenerational solidarity and suggest that future research should prioritize standardized approach and balanced evaluations to strengthen the evidence base and guide effective practice in an aging society.
期刊介绍:
A highly respected, multidisciplinary journal, International Psychogeriatrics publishes high quality original research papers in the field of psychogeriatrics. The journal aims to be the leading peer reviewed journal dealing with all aspects of the mental health of older people throughout the world. Circulated to over 1,000 members of the International Psychogeriatric Association, International Psychogeriatrics also features important editorials, provocative debates, literature reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor.