Navigating the lunar frontier: one hundred landing sites at the south pole for future mission challenges.

IF 21.1 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Yongjiu Feng, Pengshuo Li, Haoteng Li, Yan Liu, Mengrong Xi, Rong Wang, Shurui Chen, Panli Tang, Yuze Cao, Qian Huang, Qionghua You, Shijie Liu, Zhen Ye, Yusheng Xu, Xiong Xu, Chao Wang, Yanmin Jin, Sicong Liu, Huan Xie, Huaiyu He, Xiaohua Tong
{"title":"Navigating the lunar frontier: one hundred landing sites at the south pole for future mission challenges.","authors":"Yongjiu Feng, Pengshuo Li, Haoteng Li, Yan Liu, Mengrong Xi, Rong Wang, Shurui Chen, Panli Tang, Yuze Cao, Qian Huang, Qionghua You, Shijie Liu, Zhen Ye, Yusheng Xu, Xiong Xu, Chao Wang, Yanmin Jin, Sicong Liu, Huan Xie, Huaiyu He, Xiaohua Tong","doi":"10.1016/j.scib.2025.08.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite humanity's many lunar missions to the equatorial and mid-latitude regions, the south pole remains uncharted because of its exceptionally harsh conditions. The quest for water ice and the drive to establish lunar bases have positioned the south pole area above 80° latitude, characterized by permanently shaded regions and conducive to water ice preservation. However, the daunting terrain and intricate illumination in this area present significant challenges to engineering safety. Here, we introduce a Landing Feasibility Probability (LFP) model to evaluate the viability of potential landing sites. We pinpoint 120 prospective landing sites, stratified into 25 high-priority, 64 medium-priority, and 31 low-priority sites. These sites, encompassing a mere 0.6 % of the lunar south pole, have been rigorously vetted against 10 critical factors for landing feasibility. These sites show a pronounced clustering around 8 major craters and plateaus, organizing into 7 lunar site networks, with each network comprising 4 sites with a maximum dimension under 25 km, ideal for the development of lunar bases and observational networks. The LFP model's selection process is derived from a heuristic Genetic Algorithm (GA) informed by expert experience. The landing sites are strategically positioned to address the dual challenges of scientific goals and engineering safety at the lunar south pole, while also providing site selection guidance and facilitating international collaboration and communication for lunar expeditions. This method can also be adapted for site selection on other celestial bodies (e.g. Mars and asteroids) for scientific exploration and construction of extraterrestrial bases.</p>","PeriodicalId":421,"journal":{"name":"Science Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2025.08.035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite humanity's many lunar missions to the equatorial and mid-latitude regions, the south pole remains uncharted because of its exceptionally harsh conditions. The quest for water ice and the drive to establish lunar bases have positioned the south pole area above 80° latitude, characterized by permanently shaded regions and conducive to water ice preservation. However, the daunting terrain and intricate illumination in this area present significant challenges to engineering safety. Here, we introduce a Landing Feasibility Probability (LFP) model to evaluate the viability of potential landing sites. We pinpoint 120 prospective landing sites, stratified into 25 high-priority, 64 medium-priority, and 31 low-priority sites. These sites, encompassing a mere 0.6 % of the lunar south pole, have been rigorously vetted against 10 critical factors for landing feasibility. These sites show a pronounced clustering around 8 major craters and plateaus, organizing into 7 lunar site networks, with each network comprising 4 sites with a maximum dimension under 25 km, ideal for the development of lunar bases and observational networks. The LFP model's selection process is derived from a heuristic Genetic Algorithm (GA) informed by expert experience. The landing sites are strategically positioned to address the dual challenges of scientific goals and engineering safety at the lunar south pole, while also providing site selection guidance and facilitating international collaboration and communication for lunar expeditions. This method can also be adapted for site selection on other celestial bodies (e.g. Mars and asteroids) for scientific exploration and construction of extraterrestrial bases.

在月球前沿航行:在南极的100个着陆点为未来的任务挑战。
尽管人类在赤道和中纬度地区执行了许多月球任务,但由于南极的环境异常恶劣,它仍然是未知的。对水冰的探索和建立月球基地的努力已经将南极地区定位在纬度80°以上,其特征是永久阴影区,有利于水冰的保存。然而,该地区复杂的地形和复杂的照明对工程安全提出了重大挑战。本文引入着陆可行性概率(LFP)模型来评估潜在着陆点的可行性。我们确定了120个潜在的着陆点,分为25个高优先级,64个中等优先级和31个低优先级。这些地点仅占月球南极的0.6%,经过严格审查,符合登陆可行性的10个关键因素。这些站点在8个主要陨石坑和高原周围明显聚集,组织成7个月球站点网络,每个站点网络由4个站点组成,最大尺寸在25公里以下,是发展月球基地和观测网络的理想选择。LFP模型的选择过程是基于专家经验的启发式遗传算法(GA)。着陆点的战略定位是为了解决月球南极科学目标和工程安全的双重挑战,同时也为月球探险提供选址指导和促进国际合作与交流。该方法也可适用于其他天体(如火星和小行星)的选址,用于科学探索和建设地外基地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science Bulletin
Science Bulletin MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
24.60
自引率
2.10%
发文量
8092
期刊介绍: Science Bulletin (Sci. Bull., formerly known as Chinese Science Bulletin) is a multidisciplinary academic journal supervised by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and co-sponsored by the CAS and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC). Sci. Bull. is a semi-monthly international journal publishing high-caliber peer-reviewed research on a broad range of natural sciences and high-tech fields on the basis of its originality, scientific significance and whether it is of general interest. In addition, we are committed to serving the scientific community with immediate, authoritative news and valuable insights into upcoming trends around the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信