Vessel Selection in Head and Neck Reconstruction After Neck Dissection or Radiotherapy

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Microsurgery Pub Date : 2025-09-08 DOI:10.1002/micr.70116
Yasufumi Makiuchi, Daisuke Kageyama, Masaki Arikawa, Satoshi Akazawa
{"title":"Vessel Selection in Head and Neck Reconstruction After Neck Dissection or Radiotherapy","authors":"Yasufumi Makiuchi,&nbsp;Daisuke Kageyama,&nbsp;Masaki Arikawa,&nbsp;Satoshi Akazawa","doi":"10.1002/micr.70116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Free flap transfer is an essential technique for head and neck reconstruction after oncological ablative resection. Selection of recipient vessels can be challenging in patients with a history of neck dissection and/or radiotherapy. We analyzed outcomes with regard to recipient vessel selection and flap failure, referring to patients' histories of radiotherapy and/or neck dissection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Records of 671 patients who had undergone head and neck reconstruction in our institution from April 2018 to March 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. We divided patients into four groups based on their treatment history: radiotherapy alone (<i>RT</i>, <i>n</i> = 82), neck dissection alone (<i>ND</i>, <i>n</i> = 43), both radiotherapy and neck dissection (<i>NDRT</i>, <i>n</i> = 39), and intact neck with no history of radiotherapy or neck dissection (<i>IN</i>, <i>n</i> = 488). We collected data on flap types, defect areas, selected recipient vessels, and the occurrence of flap failure. We also assessed the risk factors for flap failure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In <i>Group RT</i>, 66 of 84 (79%) recipient vessels were located within irradiated areas. In contrast, in <i>Group ND</i>, 37 of 45 (82%) recipient vessels were outside the dissected areas. No significant association was observed between overall flap failure and variables we assessed. However, our additional flap failure analysis by arterial or venous factors showed an association with the patients' history of radiation treatment (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and in cases where anastomosed vessels were actually located within irradiated areas (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In patients with previous radiotherapy history, recipient vessels even within irradiated areas can often be successfully used as recipient vessels. However, after undergoing irradiation treatment, the risk of venous-related flap failure may be higher compared with the non-irradiated area; thus, it necessitates careful consideration during reconstruction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"45 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.70116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Free flap transfer is an essential technique for head and neck reconstruction after oncological ablative resection. Selection of recipient vessels can be challenging in patients with a history of neck dissection and/or radiotherapy. We analyzed outcomes with regard to recipient vessel selection and flap failure, referring to patients' histories of radiotherapy and/or neck dissection.

Methods

Records of 671 patients who had undergone head and neck reconstruction in our institution from April 2018 to March 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. We divided patients into four groups based on their treatment history: radiotherapy alone (RT, n = 82), neck dissection alone (ND, n = 43), both radiotherapy and neck dissection (NDRT, n = 39), and intact neck with no history of radiotherapy or neck dissection (IN, n = 488). We collected data on flap types, defect areas, selected recipient vessels, and the occurrence of flap failure. We also assessed the risk factors for flap failure.

Results

In Group RT, 66 of 84 (79%) recipient vessels were located within irradiated areas. In contrast, in Group ND, 37 of 45 (82%) recipient vessels were outside the dissected areas. No significant association was observed between overall flap failure and variables we assessed. However, our additional flap failure analysis by arterial or venous factors showed an association with the patients' history of radiation treatment (p < 0.05) and in cases where anastomosed vessels were actually located within irradiated areas (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

In patients with previous radiotherapy history, recipient vessels even within irradiated areas can often be successfully used as recipient vessels. However, after undergoing irradiation treatment, the risk of venous-related flap failure may be higher compared with the non-irradiated area; thus, it necessitates careful consideration during reconstruction.

颈部剥离或放疗后头颈部重建的血管选择
背景游离皮瓣移植是肿瘤消融切除后头颈部重建的重要技术。对于有颈部剥离和/或放疗史的患者,选择受体血管可能具有挑战性。我们分析了有关受体血管选择和皮瓣失败的结果,参考了患者的放疗史和/或颈部剥离。方法回顾性分析我院2018年4月至2024年3月671例头颈部重建术患者的临床资料。我们根据患者的治疗史将患者分为四组:单纯放疗组(RT, n = 82)、单纯颈部清扫组(ND, n = 43)、同时放疗和颈部清扫组(NDRT, n = 39)、完整颈部且无放疗或颈部清扫史(IN, n = 488)。我们收集了皮瓣类型、缺损区域、选择的受体血管和皮瓣失败的发生等数据。我们还评估了皮瓣失败的危险因素。结果RT组84只受体血管中有66只(79%)位于辐照区。相反,在ND组,45条受体血管中有37条(82%)位于解剖区之外。我们所评估的变量与皮瓣整体失效之间没有明显的关联。然而,我们通过动脉或静脉因素进行的额外皮瓣失效分析显示,与患者的放射治疗史(p < 0.05)以及吻合血管实际上位于辐照区域的病例(p < 0.05)有关。结论既往有放疗史的患者,即使在放疗区域内,也可成功使用受体血管。然而,在接受辐照治疗后,静脉相关皮瓣失效的风险可能高于未辐照区;因此,在重建过程中需要仔细考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microsurgery
Microsurgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信