Jefferson R. Bercaw , Patrick X. Bradley , Christopher C. Otap , Lauren N. Heckelman , Krystal S. Tamayo , Kwadwo A. Owusu-Akyaw , Andrzej S. Kosinski , Roarke W. Horstmeyer , Charles E. Spritzer , Louis E. DeFrate
{"title":"A deep learning-based approach for measuring patellar cartilage deformations from knee MR images","authors":"Jefferson R. Bercaw , Patrick X. Bradley , Christopher C. Otap , Lauren N. Heckelman , Krystal S. Tamayo , Kwadwo A. Owusu-Akyaw , Andrzej S. Kosinski , Roarke W. Horstmeyer , Charles E. Spritzer , Louis E. DeFrate","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability in the United States, OA within the patellofemoral joint is understudied compared to the tibiofemoral joint. Mechanical alterations to cartilage may be among the first changes indicative of early OA. MR-based protocols have probed patellar cartilage mechanical function by measuring deformations in response to exercise. These studies, however, often rely on manual segmentation, which is time-intensive and may introduce variability. Therefore, our goals were (1) to develop convolutional neural networks to segment the patella and patellar cartilage from knee MR scans and (2) to evaluate the ability of these networks to measure exercise-induced cartilage deformations. Using a dataset of 109 knee MR scans, 2D and 3D U-Nets were developed and compared using the mean dice similarity coefficient (mDSC). Reliability of the best-performing networks was examined and the ability of these networks to detect patellar cartilage deformations following a hopping activity was evaluated. The 2D U-Net outperformed the 3D U-Net for both the patella (mDSC, 2D: 0.967 vs 3D: 0.960) and patellar cartilage (mDSC, 2D: 0.896 vs. 3D: 0.895). The 2D U-Nets demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.99, mean difference < 0.03 mm) in reproducing the mean patellar cartilage thickness across different days. Lastly, significant mean (mean ± standard deviation, 1.5 ± 1.8 %, P = 0.014) and maximum (10.6 ± 3.2 %, P < 0.001) patellar cartilage strains were detected following hopping. The autosegmentation tools developed herein provide a powerful framework for probing patellar cartilage mechanics in vivo.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112930"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004427","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability in the United States, OA within the patellofemoral joint is understudied compared to the tibiofemoral joint. Mechanical alterations to cartilage may be among the first changes indicative of early OA. MR-based protocols have probed patellar cartilage mechanical function by measuring deformations in response to exercise. These studies, however, often rely on manual segmentation, which is time-intensive and may introduce variability. Therefore, our goals were (1) to develop convolutional neural networks to segment the patella and patellar cartilage from knee MR scans and (2) to evaluate the ability of these networks to measure exercise-induced cartilage deformations. Using a dataset of 109 knee MR scans, 2D and 3D U-Nets were developed and compared using the mean dice similarity coefficient (mDSC). Reliability of the best-performing networks was examined and the ability of these networks to detect patellar cartilage deformations following a hopping activity was evaluated. The 2D U-Net outperformed the 3D U-Net for both the patella (mDSC, 2D: 0.967 vs 3D: 0.960) and patellar cartilage (mDSC, 2D: 0.896 vs. 3D: 0.895). The 2D U-Nets demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.99, mean difference < 0.03 mm) in reproducing the mean patellar cartilage thickness across different days. Lastly, significant mean (mean ± standard deviation, 1.5 ± 1.8 %, P = 0.014) and maximum (10.6 ± 3.2 %, P < 0.001) patellar cartilage strains were detected following hopping. The autosegmentation tools developed herein provide a powerful framework for probing patellar cartilage mechanics in vivo.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.