Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Cognitive Behavioral Avoidance Scale- CBAS in Brazilian adults

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Adriana Munhoz Carneiro , Pedro Henrique Nunes Souto , Alia Garrudo Guirado , Ricardo Alberto Moreno , Keith S. Dobson
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Cognitive Behavioral Avoidance Scale- CBAS in Brazilian adults","authors":"Adriana Munhoz Carneiro ,&nbsp;Pedro Henrique Nunes Souto ,&nbsp;Alia Garrudo Guirado ,&nbsp;Ricardo Alberto Moreno ,&nbsp;Keith S. Dobson","doi":"10.1016/j.jbct.2025.100550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Avoidance behavior, defined as a tendency to escape or disengage from negative stimuli, is an important psychosocial component in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), related to its maintenance and severity.</div><div>Objective</div><div>The importance of measuring this variable to enhance results in clinical interventions, this study realized a cross-cultural adaptation of the CBAS into Brazilian-Portuguese (CBAS-BR) and investigated its psychometric properties in clinical and non-clinical samples.</div><div>Methods</div><div>After the translation-back translation process by an expert committee review, the CBAS-BR was applied to a total of 310 adults (67 with major depressive disorder; 243 healthy controls). The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Depression Thought Scale (DTS) were also applied. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ω), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and convergent validity were examined.</div><div>Results</div><div>The original four-factor structure (Behavioral Social, Behavioral non-social, Cognitive Social, and Cognitive non-social) showed excellent fit (CFI = 0.981, TLI = 0.979, RMSEA = 0.046, 90 % CI = 0.039–0.053 [<em>p</em> = 0.85]). Internal consistency was high for the total scale (Cronbach’s α = 0.96; McDonald’s ω = 0.96) and for each subscale (α = 0.86–0.92). The CBAS-BR has moderate to strong correlations with the DTS, BDI II, and MADRS, supporting convergent validity.</div><div>Conclusions</div><div>The CBAS-BR is a reliable and valid measure for assessing cognitive-behavioral avoidance in Brazilian adults. It’s expected that its use may contribute to detecting maladaptive avoidance patterns and to proposing more targeted activation strategies to reduce symptoms or relapses in MDD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","volume":"36 1","pages":"Article 100550"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979125000307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Avoidance behavior, defined as a tendency to escape or disengage from negative stimuli, is an important psychosocial component in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), related to its maintenance and severity.
Objective
The importance of measuring this variable to enhance results in clinical interventions, this study realized a cross-cultural adaptation of the CBAS into Brazilian-Portuguese (CBAS-BR) and investigated its psychometric properties in clinical and non-clinical samples.
Methods
After the translation-back translation process by an expert committee review, the CBAS-BR was applied to a total of 310 adults (67 with major depressive disorder; 243 healthy controls). The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Depression Thought Scale (DTS) were also applied. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ω), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and convergent validity were examined.
Results
The original four-factor structure (Behavioral Social, Behavioral non-social, Cognitive Social, and Cognitive non-social) showed excellent fit (CFI = 0.981, TLI = 0.979, RMSEA = 0.046, 90 % CI = 0.039–0.053 [p = 0.85]). Internal consistency was high for the total scale (Cronbach’s α = 0.96; McDonald’s ω = 0.96) and for each subscale (α = 0.86–0.92). The CBAS-BR has moderate to strong correlations with the DTS, BDI II, and MADRS, supporting convergent validity.
Conclusions
The CBAS-BR is a reliable and valid measure for assessing cognitive-behavioral avoidance in Brazilian adults. It’s expected that its use may contribute to detecting maladaptive avoidance patterns and to proposing more targeted activation strategies to reduce symptoms or relapses in MDD.
巴西成人认知行为回避量表的跨文化适应和心理测量特征
逃避行为被定义为逃避或脱离负面刺激的倾向,是重度抑郁症(MDD)中重要的社会心理组成部分,与其维持和严重程度有关。目的通过对巴西-葡萄牙语(CBAS- br)的跨文化调整,研究CBAS- br在临床和非临床样本中的心理测量特性。方法经专家委员会审核后,将CBAS-BR应用于310例成人(重度抑郁症患者67例,健康对照243例)。采用Beck抑郁量表- ii (BDI-II)、Montgomery -Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)和抑郁思维量表(DTS)。检验内部一致性(Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ω)、验证性因子分析(CFA)和收敛效度。结果原四因素结构(行为社会、行为非社会、认知社会、认知非社会)拟合良好(CFI = 0.981, TLI = 0.979, RMSEA = 0.046, 90% CI = 0.039 ~ 0.053 [p = 0.85])。总体量表(Cronbach 's α = 0.96; McDonald 's ω = 0.96)和各子量表(α = 0.86-0.92)的内部一致性较高。CBAS-BR与DTS、BDI II和MADRS有中强相关,支持收敛效度。结论CBAS-BR是一种可靠、有效的评估巴西成人认知行为回避的方法。预计它的使用可能有助于发现适应不良的回避模式,并提出更有针对性的激活策略,以减少重度抑郁症的症状或复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信