Factors influencing soil carbon stocks in secondary subtropical forests of eastern China

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hong Lin , Zaihua He , Kai Tian , Xiangshi Kong , Zhaohui Li , Feng Zhou , Xingjun Tian
{"title":"Factors influencing soil carbon stocks in secondary subtropical forests of eastern China","authors":"Hong Lin ,&nbsp;Zaihua He ,&nbsp;Kai Tian ,&nbsp;Xiangshi Kong ,&nbsp;Zhaohui Li ,&nbsp;Feng Zhou ,&nbsp;Xingjun Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in forest ecosystems are a critical component of the global carbon cycle. Although multiple drivers affect SOC stocks, few studies have simultaneously tested the relative contributions of forest type, tree species richness and soil properties to SOC stocks in subtropical forests. We addressed this gap by investigating how these factors regulate SOC stocks across 25 sites spanning five forest types (bamboo, coniferous, deciduous broadleaf, evergreen broadleaf, and mixed forests) in subtropical forests. At each site, we measured SOC stocks in the topsoil and subsoil, along with assessments of soil properties, above- and belowground biomass, litter quantity and quality. The results revealed that evergreen broadleaf forests exhibited the highest SOC stocks among all forest types. Tree species richness correlated positively with topsoil carbon stocks, especially in deciduous stands, but showed a negative correlation in evergreen broadleaf forests. Greater belowground biomass also enhanced SOC in the topsoil, whereas high phosphorus in litter and soil could lead to carbon loss. These relationships were stronger in the topsoil. Bayesian structural equation modeling revealed that soil properties and phosphorus content in litter were key mediators of SOC stocks. Forest type exerted a direct positive effect on SOC stocks, while tree species richness promoted SOC stocks indirectly by altering litter quality and soil properties. These findings suggest that the impact of tree species richness on SOC is dependent on forest type and soil conditions. Therefore, forest management strategies aiming to promote SOC through biodiversity should consider forest type comprehensively, especially since phosphorus availability emerges as a key regulatory factor.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"260 ","pages":"Article 109419"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225007210","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in forest ecosystems are a critical component of the global carbon cycle. Although multiple drivers affect SOC stocks, few studies have simultaneously tested the relative contributions of forest type, tree species richness and soil properties to SOC stocks in subtropical forests. We addressed this gap by investigating how these factors regulate SOC stocks across 25 sites spanning five forest types (bamboo, coniferous, deciduous broadleaf, evergreen broadleaf, and mixed forests) in subtropical forests. At each site, we measured SOC stocks in the topsoil and subsoil, along with assessments of soil properties, above- and belowground biomass, litter quantity and quality. The results revealed that evergreen broadleaf forests exhibited the highest SOC stocks among all forest types. Tree species richness correlated positively with topsoil carbon stocks, especially in deciduous stands, but showed a negative correlation in evergreen broadleaf forests. Greater belowground biomass also enhanced SOC in the topsoil, whereas high phosphorus in litter and soil could lead to carbon loss. These relationships were stronger in the topsoil. Bayesian structural equation modeling revealed that soil properties and phosphorus content in litter were key mediators of SOC stocks. Forest type exerted a direct positive effect on SOC stocks, while tree species richness promoted SOC stocks indirectly by altering litter quality and soil properties. These findings suggest that the impact of tree species richness on SOC is dependent on forest type and soil conditions. Therefore, forest management strategies aiming to promote SOC through biodiversity should consider forest type comprehensively, especially since phosphorus availability emerges as a key regulatory factor.
中国东部亚热带次生林土壤碳储量的影响因素
森林生态系统土壤有机碳储量是全球碳循环的重要组成部分。虽然多种驱动因素影响着亚热带森林有机碳储量,但很少有研究同时测试森林类型、树种丰富度和土壤性质对亚热带森林有机碳储量的相对贡献。我们通过研究这些因子如何调节亚热带森林中5种森林类型(竹林、针叶林、落叶阔叶林、常绿阔叶林和混交林)的25个样地的有机碳储量来弥补这一空白。在每个站点,我们测量了表土和底土的有机碳储量,并评估了土壤性质、地上和地下生物量、凋落物数量和质量。结果表明,常绿阔叶林的有机碳储量最高。树种丰富度与表层土壤碳储量呈显著正相关,尤其是在落叶林中,而常绿阔叶林与表层土壤碳储量呈负相关。更大的地下生物量也增加了表层土壤的有机碳,而凋落物和土壤中的高磷可能导致碳损失。这种关系在表土中更为明显。贝叶斯结构方程模型表明,土壤性质和凋落物中磷含量是土壤有机碳储量的关键调节因子。森林类型对土壤有机碳储量具有直接的正向影响,而树种丰富度通过改变凋落物质量和土壤性质间接促进土壤有机碳储量。这些结果表明,树种丰富度对土壤有机碳的影响取决于森林类型和土壤条件。因此,旨在通过生物多样性促进有机碳的森林经营策略应综合考虑森林类型,特别是磷有效性已成为关键的调节因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信