Geological Sequestration in Tight Reservoirs with Different Fracturing Schemes: The Weiyuan Shale Gas Field, Sichuan Basin, China

IF 11.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Zhiming Chen, Laibin Zhang, Xurong Zhao, Xin Gao, Kamy Sephernoori
{"title":"Geological Sequestration in Tight Reservoirs with Different Fracturing Schemes: The Weiyuan Shale Gas Field, Sichuan Basin, China","authors":"Zhiming Chen, Laibin Zhang, Xurong Zhao, Xin Gao, Kamy Sephernoori","doi":"10.1016/j.eng.2025.08.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on caprock safety during CO<sub>2</sub> geological sequestration is essential for preventing gas leakage and safeguarding the environment. This study examines the impact mechanisms of different fracturing schemes on caprock safety during CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration in tight reservoirs to optimize sequestration strategies and provide theoretical support. Using a developed CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration model, we systematically evaluate the leakage characteristics of caprock under various fracturing schemes. For the first time, this study introduces the use of the Analytically Modified Embedded Discrete Fracture Model (AEDFM) to describe the flow interactions between fractures and the matrix during long-term CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration. Through an in-depth analysis of critical factors such as the different mechanisms of fracture parameters, sand concentration, flow rate, and fracturing fluid viscosity, we comprehensively evaluate how these fracturing schemes influence caprock safety for a case study. Validation results confirm that the AEDFM method successfully overcomes the low accuracy exhibited by the Embedded Discrete Fracture Model (EDFM) in simulating early-time transient flow. The proposed CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration model demonstrates strong agreement with production history matching performed using commercial software, affirming its reliability and practical applicability. The results from a case study show that increasing the number, half-length, and height of hydraulic fractures in fracturing designs will increase the risk of CO<sub>2</sub> leakage, thereby compromising caprock safety. If hydraulic fractures penetrate the caprock, the risk of CO<sub>2</sub> leakage through the top caprock markedly increases. In scenarios where fractures do not penetrate the caprock, the volume of leaked CO<sub>2</sub> over a 100-year sequestration period remains below 5% of the injected gas. However, leakage can rise to as much as 12% if caprock penetration occurs. Furthermore, increasing the flow rate and sand concentration and decreasing the viscosity lead to larger fracture dimensions, further increasing the risk of CO<sub>2</sub> leakage and diminishing caprock safety. An investigation of various mechanisms affecting caprock safety reveals that heterogeneity-controlled preferential flow and hydrochemical reactions tend to compromise caprock safety, while capillary forces and stress-sensitive fracture behavior increase sealing capacity. This study offers theoretical insights and practical guidance for CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration in tight reservoirs.","PeriodicalId":11783,"journal":{"name":"Engineering","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2025.08.038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on caprock safety during CO2 geological sequestration is essential for preventing gas leakage and safeguarding the environment. This study examines the impact mechanisms of different fracturing schemes on caprock safety during CO2 sequestration in tight reservoirs to optimize sequestration strategies and provide theoretical support. Using a developed CO2 sequestration model, we systematically evaluate the leakage characteristics of caprock under various fracturing schemes. For the first time, this study introduces the use of the Analytically Modified Embedded Discrete Fracture Model (AEDFM) to describe the flow interactions between fractures and the matrix during long-term CO2 sequestration. Through an in-depth analysis of critical factors such as the different mechanisms of fracture parameters, sand concentration, flow rate, and fracturing fluid viscosity, we comprehensively evaluate how these fracturing schemes influence caprock safety for a case study. Validation results confirm that the AEDFM method successfully overcomes the low accuracy exhibited by the Embedded Discrete Fracture Model (EDFM) in simulating early-time transient flow. The proposed CO2 sequestration model demonstrates strong agreement with production history matching performed using commercial software, affirming its reliability and practical applicability. The results from a case study show that increasing the number, half-length, and height of hydraulic fractures in fracturing designs will increase the risk of CO2 leakage, thereby compromising caprock safety. If hydraulic fractures penetrate the caprock, the risk of CO2 leakage through the top caprock markedly increases. In scenarios where fractures do not penetrate the caprock, the volume of leaked CO2 over a 100-year sequestration period remains below 5% of the injected gas. However, leakage can rise to as much as 12% if caprock penetration occurs. Furthermore, increasing the flow rate and sand concentration and decreasing the viscosity lead to larger fracture dimensions, further increasing the risk of CO2 leakage and diminishing caprock safety. An investigation of various mechanisms affecting caprock safety reveals that heterogeneity-controlled preferential flow and hydrochemical reactions tend to compromise caprock safety, while capillary forces and stress-sensitive fracture behavior increase sealing capacity. This study offers theoretical insights and practical guidance for CO2 sequestration in tight reservoirs.
不同压裂方案下致密储层的地质封存:四川盆地威远页岩气田
研究地质封存过程中盖层的安全性对防止天然气泄漏和保护环境具有重要意义。研究不同压裂方案对致密储层CO2封存过程中盖层安全的影响机制,为优化封存策略提供理论支持。利用建立的CO2封存模型,系统评价了不同压裂方案下盖层的泄漏特征。该研究首次引入了解析修正嵌入离散裂缝模型(AEDFM)来描述长期二氧化碳封存过程中裂缝与基质之间的流动相互作用。通过深入分析压裂参数、砂浓度、流量和压裂液粘度等不同机制的关键因素,我们综合评估了这些压裂方案如何影响盖层安全。验证结果表明,AEDFM方法成功地克服了嵌入式离散裂缝模型(EDFM)在模拟早期瞬态流动时精度较低的缺点。所建立的CO2封存模型与商业软件进行的生产历史匹配结果吻合较好,验证了模型的可靠性和实用性。一个案例研究的结果表明,在压裂设计中增加水力裂缝的数量、半长和高度将增加二氧化碳泄漏的风险,从而影响盖层的安全。如果水力裂缝穿透盖层,二氧化碳通过盖层泄漏的风险显著增加。在裂缝未穿透盖层的情况下,在100年的封存期内,泄漏的二氧化碳量仍低于注入气体的5%。然而,如果发生盖层渗透,泄漏率可能高达12%。此外,增加流量和砂浓度,降低粘度会导致裂缝尺寸增大,进一步增加CO2泄漏的风险,降低盖层的安全性。对影响盖层安全的各种机制的研究表明,非均质性控制的优先流动和水化学反应往往会损害盖层的安全,而毛细力和应力敏感的裂缝行为则会增加盖层的密封能力。该研究为致密储层的CO2封存提供了理论指导和实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering
Engineering Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
自引率
1.60%
发文量
335
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Engineering, an international open-access journal initiated by the Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE) in 2015, serves as a distinguished platform for disseminating cutting-edge advancements in engineering R&D, sharing major research outputs, and highlighting key achievements worldwide. The journal's objectives encompass reporting progress in engineering science, fostering discussions on hot topics, addressing areas of interest, challenges, and prospects in engineering development, while considering human and environmental well-being and ethics in engineering. It aims to inspire breakthroughs and innovations with profound economic and social significance, propelling them to advanced international standards and transforming them into a new productive force. Ultimately, this endeavor seeks to bring about positive changes globally, benefit humanity, and shape a new future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信