Hearing Aid Satisfaction and Usage Patterns Across Age Groups: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

IF 1.3
Nagihan Gülhan Yaşar, İrem Şi̇şko Ağgünlü, Agah Yeni̇çeri̇, Burak Hazır, Mustafa Çolak, Ayşe Seçil Kayali Di̇nç, Melih Çayönü
{"title":"Hearing Aid Satisfaction and Usage Patterns Across Age Groups: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.","authors":"Nagihan Gülhan Yaşar, İrem Şi̇şko Ağgünlü, Agah Yeni̇çeri̇, Burak Hazır, Mustafa Çolak, Ayşe Seçil Kayali Di̇nç, Melih Çayönü","doi":"10.1159/000548356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IIntroduction: This study aimed to evaluate hearing aid satisfaction and usage patterns across different age groups and to investigate the impact of hearing aids on quality of life. Material and Methods: Hearing aid satisfaction and perceived benefit were evaluated using the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA), administered via phone interview after at least 6 months of use. A total of 850 patients who were prescribed hearing aids for the first time at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology between January 2020 and January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The mean age of participants was 65.4 ± 13.4 years, and the prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss increased significantly with age. Pure tone thresholds and WRS were lower in the older age groups. However, no significant differences were found in IOI-HA scores across the age categories. The WRS was the only significant predictor of total IOI-HA scores (B = 0.016, p = 0.009, R² = 0.010). Behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids were more commonly used among older participants Conclusions: Hearing aid satisfaction did not differ according to age, and the severity of hearing loss alone was not a strong determinant. Speech discrimination ability was identified as a consistent predictor of perceived benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":520736,"journal":{"name":"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IIntroduction: This study aimed to evaluate hearing aid satisfaction and usage patterns across different age groups and to investigate the impact of hearing aids on quality of life. Material and Methods: Hearing aid satisfaction and perceived benefit were evaluated using the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA), administered via phone interview after at least 6 months of use. A total of 850 patients who were prescribed hearing aids for the first time at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology between January 2020 and January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The mean age of participants was 65.4 ± 13.4 years, and the prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss increased significantly with age. Pure tone thresholds and WRS were lower in the older age groups. However, no significant differences were found in IOI-HA scores across the age categories. The WRS was the only significant predictor of total IOI-HA scores (B = 0.016, p = 0.009, R² = 0.010). Behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids were more commonly used among older participants Conclusions: Hearing aid satisfaction did not differ according to age, and the severity of hearing loss alone was not a strong determinant. Speech discrimination ability was identified as a consistent predictor of perceived benefit.

助听器满意度和使用模式跨年龄组:横断面分析。
本研究旨在评估不同年龄组的助听器满意度和使用模式,并探讨助听器对生活质量的影响。材料和方法:使用国际助听器结果清单(IOI-HA)评估助听器满意度和感知益处,在使用至少6个月后通过电话访谈进行。回顾性分析2020年1月至2023年1月期间在耳鼻喉科首次使用助听器的850例患者。结果:参与者的平均年龄为65.4±13.4岁,感音神经性听力损失的患病率随着年龄的增长而显著增加。老年组的纯音阈值和WRS较低。然而,IOI-HA评分在不同年龄类别中没有显著差异。WRS是IOI-HA总分的唯一显著预测因子(B = 0.016, p = 0.009, R²= 0.010)。结论:助听器满意度不因年龄而异,听力损失的严重程度本身并不是一个强有力的决定因素。言语辨别能力被确定为感知利益的一致预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信