Experiences of Potential Living Donors Who Withdrew From Liver Donor Evaluation: A Qualitative Study.

IF 0.8
Tugba Nur Oden, Tufan Gumus, Sirin Vatansever Durmus, Alper Uguz
{"title":"Experiences of Potential Living Donors Who Withdrew From Liver Donor Evaluation: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Tugba Nur Oden, Tufan Gumus, Sirin Vatansever Durmus, Alper Uguz","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the psychological, emotional, and managerial challenges faced by potential donors is essential for the proper management of the living donor evaluation process, and appropriate solutions need to be developed for these challenges. This study aimed to explore the experiences of potential liver donors who voluntarily withdrew from the living donor evaluation process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A phenomenological qualitative design was employed. Ten participants who had voluntarily withdrawn from the living donor evaluation process were interviewed. Three main themes were identified: (1) Experiences Related to the Evaluation Process, (2) Reasons for the Withdrawal Decision, and (3) Recommendations regarding the potential donor evaluation process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive experiences included adequate information sharing, emotional support, psychiatric consultations, and support from hospital staff. Negative experiences focused on prolonged waiting times, psychological and emotional barriers, systemic and organizational issues. Key reasons for withdrawal included concerns about health and surgical risks, family responsibilities, psychological unpreparedness, and organizational difficulties experienced throughout the evaluation process. Participants suggested accelerating hospital procedures, improving communication with specialists, offering accommodation during the evaluation process, and increasing public awareness about organ donation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings emphasize the need to improve the living donor evaluation process. Prioritizing donor candidates, expediting procedures, and developing donor support programs that address physical, emotional, financial, and systemic needs may enhance the effectiveness of living donor transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94258,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.08.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding the psychological, emotional, and managerial challenges faced by potential donors is essential for the proper management of the living donor evaluation process, and appropriate solutions need to be developed for these challenges. This study aimed to explore the experiences of potential liver donors who voluntarily withdrew from the living donor evaluation process.

Methods: A phenomenological qualitative design was employed. Ten participants who had voluntarily withdrawn from the living donor evaluation process were interviewed. Three main themes were identified: (1) Experiences Related to the Evaluation Process, (2) Reasons for the Withdrawal Decision, and (3) Recommendations regarding the potential donor evaluation process.

Results: Positive experiences included adequate information sharing, emotional support, psychiatric consultations, and support from hospital staff. Negative experiences focused on prolonged waiting times, psychological and emotional barriers, systemic and organizational issues. Key reasons for withdrawal included concerns about health and surgical risks, family responsibilities, psychological unpreparedness, and organizational difficulties experienced throughout the evaluation process. Participants suggested accelerating hospital procedures, improving communication with specialists, offering accommodation during the evaluation process, and increasing public awareness about organ donation.

Conclusions: The findings emphasize the need to improve the living donor evaluation process. Prioritizing donor candidates, expediting procedures, and developing donor support programs that address physical, emotional, financial, and systemic needs may enhance the effectiveness of living donor transplantation.

潜在活体供者退出肝供者评估的经验:一项定性研究。
背景:了解潜在捐赠者面临的心理、情感和管理方面的挑战,对于正确管理活体捐赠者评估过程至关重要,需要针对这些挑战制定适当的解决方案。本研究旨在探讨自愿退出活体供者评估过程的潜在肝供者的经历。方法:采用现象学定性设计。十位自愿退出活体捐献者评估过程的参与者接受了采访。确定了三个主要主题:(1)与评估过程相关的经验;(2)退出决定的原因;(3)关于潜在捐助者评估过程的建议。结果:积极体验包括充分的信息分享、情感支持、精神咨询和医院工作人员的支持。消极体验主要集中在等待时间过长、心理和情感障碍、系统和组织问题上。退出的主要原因包括担心健康和手术风险、家庭责任、心理准备不足以及在整个评估过程中遇到的组织困难。与会者建议加快医院程序,改善与专家的沟通,在评估过程中提供住宿,以及提高公众对器官捐赠的认识。结论:研究结果强调了改进活体供体评估过程的必要性。优先考虑供体候选人,加快程序,制定供体支持计划,解决身体,情感,经济和系统需求,可以提高活体供体移植的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信