Wide-field Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Euclidian Distance Analysis of Microvascular Deficits in Glaucomatous Eyes.

IF 3.2 Q2 Medicine
Diogo F Muller, Yingying Shi, Maria J Chaves-Samaniego, Khushali Shah, Gustavo Rosa Gameiro, Giovanni Gregori, Steven J Gedde, Luis E Vazquez
{"title":"Wide-field Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Euclidian Distance Analysis of Microvascular Deficits in Glaucomatous Eyes.","authors":"Diogo F Muller, Yingying Shi, Maria J Chaves-Samaniego, Khushali Shah, Gustavo Rosa Gameiro, Giovanni Gregori, Steven J Gedde, Luis E Vazquez","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2025.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate superficial microvascular deficits of glaucomatous eyes with wide-field optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and Euclidian distance (ED) analysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Swept-source OCTA (SS-OCTA) images of healthy and glaucomatous eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>12x12mm scans of healthy and glaucomatous eyes were acquired with SS-OCTA (PLEX® Elite 9000, ZEISS). The en face images of the superficial retina segmentation were exported and analyzed with ImageJ software. A fixed threshold that predicted the size of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was used to generate binarized images with vascular (white) or deficient (black) pixels. Four vascular parameters were measured within a macula-centered 9x10.8mm ellipse: vascular density (VD), average ED (ED<sub>avg</sub>), maximum ED (ED<sub>max</sub>), and non-perfusion density (NPD). ED values were visualized with Heat-map color scale. The vascular parameters were compared between healthy and glaucomatous eyes (Student's t-test). Person coefficients were calculated to test correlations between the vascular parameters and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness, and visual field mean deviation (VFMD) in glaucomatous eyes. P<0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Main outcome: </strong>VD, ED<sub>avg</sub>, ED<sub>max</sub>, and NPD RESULTS: Forty glaucomatous and twenty-five healthy eyes were included. VD (fraction) was 0.442 ± 0.029 vs. 0.3205 ± 0.072 (P<0.001), ED<sub>avg</sub> (μm) was 17.37 ± 0.549 vs. 32.62 ± 9.545 (P<0.001), ED<sub>max</sub> (μm) was 153.7 ± 49.15 vs. 248.5 ± 156.6 (P=0.005), and NPD (%) was 0.97 ± 0.82 vs. 7.09 ± 5.99 (P<0.001) in healthy vs. glaucomatous eyes. VD, ED, and NPD were better in ONH sectors than in temporal macula and retinal periphery sectors in both groups, but worse in the glaucoma group across all sectors of the ellipse (P<0.01 for all sectors). Microvascular deficits in glaucomatous eyes often exceeded structural and functional glaucomatous damage, and there was modest correlation between the vascular and structural/functional parameters. Pearson r of the correlation with average RNFL and GCIPL were highest for VD (r=0.46, P=0.002 and r=-0.49, P=0.001, respectively) and lowest for ED<sub>max</sub> (r=-0.19, P=0.24 and r=-0.23, P=0.16, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VD, ED, and NPD were worse in glaucomatous compared to healthy eyes throughout the wide-field OCTA image. High ED and NPD values accentuate regions of inadequate perfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":56368,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2025.08.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate superficial microvascular deficits of glaucomatous eyes with wide-field optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and Euclidian distance (ED) analysis.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Subjects: Swept-source OCTA (SS-OCTA) images of healthy and glaucomatous eyes.

Methods: 12x12mm scans of healthy and glaucomatous eyes were acquired with SS-OCTA (PLEX® Elite 9000, ZEISS). The en face images of the superficial retina segmentation were exported and analyzed with ImageJ software. A fixed threshold that predicted the size of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was used to generate binarized images with vascular (white) or deficient (black) pixels. Four vascular parameters were measured within a macula-centered 9x10.8mm ellipse: vascular density (VD), average ED (EDavg), maximum ED (EDmax), and non-perfusion density (NPD). ED values were visualized with Heat-map color scale. The vascular parameters were compared between healthy and glaucomatous eyes (Student's t-test). Person coefficients were calculated to test correlations between the vascular parameters and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness, and visual field mean deviation (VFMD) in glaucomatous eyes. P<0.05 was considered significant.

Main outcome: VD, EDavg, EDmax, and NPD RESULTS: Forty glaucomatous and twenty-five healthy eyes were included. VD (fraction) was 0.442 ± 0.029 vs. 0.3205 ± 0.072 (P<0.001), EDavg (μm) was 17.37 ± 0.549 vs. 32.62 ± 9.545 (P<0.001), EDmax (μm) was 153.7 ± 49.15 vs. 248.5 ± 156.6 (P=0.005), and NPD (%) was 0.97 ± 0.82 vs. 7.09 ± 5.99 (P<0.001) in healthy vs. glaucomatous eyes. VD, ED, and NPD were better in ONH sectors than in temporal macula and retinal periphery sectors in both groups, but worse in the glaucoma group across all sectors of the ellipse (P<0.01 for all sectors). Microvascular deficits in glaucomatous eyes often exceeded structural and functional glaucomatous damage, and there was modest correlation between the vascular and structural/functional parameters. Pearson r of the correlation with average RNFL and GCIPL were highest for VD (r=0.46, P=0.002 and r=-0.49, P=0.001, respectively) and lowest for EDmax (r=-0.19, P=0.24 and r=-0.23, P=0.16, respectively).

Conclusions: VD, ED, and NPD were worse in glaucomatous compared to healthy eyes throughout the wide-field OCTA image. High ED and NPD values accentuate regions of inadequate perfusion.

青光眼微血管缺损的宽视场光学相干断层血管造影和欧氏距离分析。
目的:应用宽视场光学相干断层血管造影(OCTA)和欧氏距离(ED)分析评价青光眼浅表微血管缺损。设计:横断面研究。受试者:健康眼和青光眼的扫描源OCTA (SS-OCTA)图像。方法:采用SS-OCTA (PLEX®Elite 9000,蔡司)对健康眼和青光眼进行12x12mm扫描。利用ImageJ软件导出视网膜浅面分割的人脸图像并进行分析。预测中央凹无血管区(FAZ)大小的固定阈值用于生成血管(白色)或缺陷(黑色)像素的二值化图像。在以黄斑为中心的9 × 10.8mm椭圆范围内测量4项血管参数:血管密度(VD)、平均ED (EDavg)、最大ED (EDmax)和非灌注密度(NPD)。用热图色标显示ED值。比较健康眼和青光眼的血管参数(学生t检验)。计算Person系数,检验青光眼血管参数与视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度、黄斑神经节细胞及内丛状层(GCIPL)厚度、视野平均偏差(VFMD)的相关性。主要结局:VD、EDavg、EDmax和NPD结果:纳入40只青光眼和25只健康眼。VD(分数)为0.442±0.029 vs 0.3205±0.072;Pavg (μm)为17.37±0.549 vs 32.62±9.545;Pmax (μm)为153.7±49.15 vs 248.5±156.6 (P=0.005); NPD(%)为0.97±0.82 vs 7.09±5.99 (Pmax (r=-0.19, P=0.24和r=-0.23, P=0.16)。结论:在宽视场OCTA图像上,青光眼患者的VD、ED和NPD比健康人更严重。高ED和NPD值突出了灌注不足的区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
140
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信