Evaluation of Amplification Systems for Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Single-Sided Deafness: A Comparative Study With Low-Frequency Stimulus.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Yağız Korkut, Isa Tuncay Batuk, Merve Ozbal Batuk, Levent Sennaroğlu
{"title":"Evaluation of Amplification Systems for Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Single-Sided Deafness: A Comparative Study With Low-Frequency Stimulus.","authors":"Yağız Korkut, Isa Tuncay Batuk, Merve Ozbal Batuk, Levent Sennaroğlu","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-24-00146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of different hearing devices on sound localization and speech perception in individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD). Specifically, the study sought to assess the performance of softband bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs) and contralateral routing of signals hearing aids (CROS HA) in various conditions to determine their effectiveness in improving auditory outcomes for SSD patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighteen participants (aged between 20 and 50 years) with SSD underwent tests using softband BAHA, CROS HA, and unaided conditions in a counterbalanced design. Sound localization tests, speech perception in noise assessments, and subjective satisfaction ratings were conducted to measure the effectiveness of the hearing devices. The study employed a single-subject, repeated-measures experimental design to compare the performance of the different devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that softband BAHA significantly improved sound localization, particularly in low-frequency stimulus localization, compared to CROS HA and unaided conditions (<i>p</i> = .03). Subjective satisfaction scores aligned with objective test outcomes, indicating a preference for softband BAHA. Speech perception in noise performance varied across conditions, with both hearing devices showing benefits in certain scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study have important clinical implications for selecting appropriate hearing device options for SSD patients. Softband BAHA demonstrated superior performance in sound localization tasks, as evidenced by the significant improvement observed in the Azimuth Localization Test results. This test measures a central auditory skill-sound localization-by evaluating participants' ability to accurately identify the direction of sound sources. The enhanced performance with softband BAHA in this task suggests that the BAHA device provides the brain with more robust cues for localization when compared with the CROS device. Using suitable hearing devices during rehabilitation for SSD patients is crucial for enhancing auditory outcomes and quality of life in this population. Further research is warranted to address the limitations identified and optimize rehabilitation strategies for individuals with SSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-24-00146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of different hearing devices on sound localization and speech perception in individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD). Specifically, the study sought to assess the performance of softband bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs) and contralateral routing of signals hearing aids (CROS HA) in various conditions to determine their effectiveness in improving auditory outcomes for SSD patients.

Method: Eighteen participants (aged between 20 and 50 years) with SSD underwent tests using softband BAHA, CROS HA, and unaided conditions in a counterbalanced design. Sound localization tests, speech perception in noise assessments, and subjective satisfaction ratings were conducted to measure the effectiveness of the hearing devices. The study employed a single-subject, repeated-measures experimental design to compare the performance of the different devices.

Results: The results revealed that softband BAHA significantly improved sound localization, particularly in low-frequency stimulus localization, compared to CROS HA and unaided conditions (p = .03). Subjective satisfaction scores aligned with objective test outcomes, indicating a preference for softband BAHA. Speech perception in noise performance varied across conditions, with both hearing devices showing benefits in certain scenarios.

Conclusions: The findings of this study have important clinical implications for selecting appropriate hearing device options for SSD patients. Softband BAHA demonstrated superior performance in sound localization tasks, as evidenced by the significant improvement observed in the Azimuth Localization Test results. This test measures a central auditory skill-sound localization-by evaluating participants' ability to accurately identify the direction of sound sources. The enhanced performance with softband BAHA in this task suggests that the BAHA device provides the brain with more robust cues for localization when compared with the CROS device. Using suitable hearing devices during rehabilitation for SSD patients is crucial for enhancing auditory outcomes and quality of life in this population. Further research is warranted to address the limitations identified and optimize rehabilitation strategies for individuals with SSD.

单侧耳聋扩音系统对声音定位和言语感知的评价:低频刺激的比较研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估不同助听器对单侧耳聋(SSD)患者声音定位和言语感知的影响。具体而言,该研究旨在评估软带骨锚定助听器(BAHAs)和对侧信号路由助听器(CROS HA)在各种情况下的性能,以确定它们在改善SSD患者听觉结果方面的有效性。方法:18名患有SSD的参与者(年龄在20至50岁之间)在平衡设计中使用软带BAHA、CROS HA和无辅助条件进行测试。通过声音定位测试、噪音评估中的语音感知和主观满意度评分来衡量听力设备的有效性。该研究采用单受试者、重复测量的实验设计来比较不同设备的性能。结果:结果显示,与crs HA和无辅助条件相比,软带BAHA显著改善了声音定位,特别是低频刺激定位(p = .03)。主观满意度得分与客观测试结果一致,表明对软带BAHA的偏好。在不同的条件下,噪音表现的语音感知有所不同,在某些情况下,两种听力设备都显示出优势。结论:本研究结果对SSD患者选择合适的听力设备具有重要的临床意义。Softband BAHA在声音定位任务中表现出优异的性能,在方位角定位测试结果中观察到的显著改善证明了这一点。这个测试通过评估参与者准确识别声源方向的能力来衡量一项核心听觉技能——声音定位。在这项任务中,使用软带BAHA的增强性能表明,与CROS装置相比,BAHA装置为大脑提供了更强大的定位线索。在SSD患者康复过程中使用合适的助听器对于提高该人群的听力预后和生活质量至关重要。需要进一步的研究来解决已确定的局限性,并优化SSD患者的康复策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Audiology
American Journal of Audiology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信