Is the Botulinum Toxin Injection Into the Cricopharyngeal Sphincter Precipitate Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms in Patients With Retrograde Cricopharyngeal Dysfunction?

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Jérôme R Lechien, Marie Mailly, Stéphane Hans
{"title":"Is the Botulinum Toxin Injection Into the Cricopharyngeal Sphincter Precipitate Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms in Patients With Retrograde Cricopharyngeal Dysfunction?","authors":"Jérôme R Lechien, Marie Mailly, Stéphane Hans","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.08.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the potential relationship between retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction (R-CPD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) at baseline and whether cricopharyngeal sphincter paralysis botulinum toxin injection (BTI) is associated with an increase of LPRD symptoms in treated R-CPD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with clinical diagnosis of R-CPD were prospectively recruited from two European hospitals. Controls included individuals unable to burp without troublesome symptoms (CT1) and healthy subjects able to burp (CT2). All participants completed the Burp Score and Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) at baseline. R-CPD patients underwent office-based electromyography-guided BTI followed by a 3- to 6-month follow-up evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two R-CPD patients and 133 gender- and age-matched controls (30 CT1, 103 CT2) completed baseline evaluations. Burp scores were significantly higher in the R-CPD and CT1 groups compared to CT2, with CT1 subjects presenting mild symptom scores significantly exceeding CT2 levels. No significant differences in RSS-12 total scores were observed between R-CPD and CT2 subjects. Among 38 R-CPD patients completing postBTI evaluation (22 responders), RSS-12 total scores remained stable. Dysphonia and dysphagia scores significantly increased post treatment, potentially representing BTI-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This preliminary clinical study supports that R-CPD and LPRD are distinct clinical disorders, with BTI treatment improving R-CPD symptoms without significantly increasing LPRD symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.08.021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the potential relationship between retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction (R-CPD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) at baseline and whether cricopharyngeal sphincter paralysis botulinum toxin injection (BTI) is associated with an increase of LPRD symptoms in treated R-CPD patients.

Methods: Patients with clinical diagnosis of R-CPD were prospectively recruited from two European hospitals. Controls included individuals unable to burp without troublesome symptoms (CT1) and healthy subjects able to burp (CT2). All participants completed the Burp Score and Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) at baseline. R-CPD patients underwent office-based electromyography-guided BTI followed by a 3- to 6-month follow-up evaluation.

Results: Forty-two R-CPD patients and 133 gender- and age-matched controls (30 CT1, 103 CT2) completed baseline evaluations. Burp scores were significantly higher in the R-CPD and CT1 groups compared to CT2, with CT1 subjects presenting mild symptom scores significantly exceeding CT2 levels. No significant differences in RSS-12 total scores were observed between R-CPD and CT2 subjects. Among 38 R-CPD patients completing postBTI evaluation (22 responders), RSS-12 total scores remained stable. Dysphonia and dysphagia scores significantly increased post treatment, potentially representing BTI-related adverse events.

Conclusion: This preliminary clinical study supports that R-CPD and LPRD are distinct clinical disorders, with BTI treatment improving R-CPD symptoms without significantly increasing LPRD symptoms.

环咽括约肌注射肉毒杆菌毒素是否会引起逆行环咽功能障碍患者的咽喉反流症状?
目的:探讨逆行性环咽功能障碍(R-CPD)与喉咽反流病(LPRD)基线时的潜在关系,以及环咽括约肌麻痹肉毒毒素注射(BTI)是否与R-CPD治疗患者LPRD症状的增加有关。方法:前瞻性地从欧洲两家医院招募临床诊断为R-CPD的患者。对照组包括无麻烦症状不能打嗝的个体(CT1)和能够打嗝的健康受试者(CT2)。所有参与者在基线时完成打嗝评分和反流症状评分-12 (RSS-12)。R-CPD患者接受以办公室为基础的肌电图引导的BTI,随后进行3至6个月的随访评估。结果:42名R-CPD患者和133名性别和年龄匹配的对照组(30名CT1, 103名CT2)完成了基线评估。R-CPD组和CT1组的打嗝评分明显高于CT2组,其中CT1组的轻度症状评分明显高于CT2组。R-CPD与CT2受试者的rs -12总分无显著差异。在38名完成bti后评估的R-CPD患者中(22名应答者),RSS-12总分保持稳定。发音困难和吞咽困难评分在治疗后显著增加,可能代表bti相关的不良事件。结论:本初步临床研究支持R-CPD和LPRD是不同的临床疾病,BTI治疗可改善R-CPD症状,但未显著增加LPRD症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信