Complementary Interventions Using Technology for Individuals With Infertility Using Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Jiwon Lee, Jaejin Kang, Jo Woon Seok
{"title":"Complementary Interventions Using Technology for Individuals With Infertility Using Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Jiwon Lee, Jaejin Kang, Jo Woon Seok","doi":"10.1111/nhs.70227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global rise in infertility highlights the need for personalized informational and psychological support. Digital health technology offers a promising avenue; however, knowledge gaps remain regarding optimal delivery methods, outcomes, and limitations. This scoping review synthesizes recent evidence on complementary interventions using technology for individuals with infertility undergoing reproductive technology-assisted interventions and evaluates their effectiveness and limitations. Seven databases were systematically searched to identify studies published in English or Korean between 2000 and December 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist, and data were synthesized using a standardized template. Of 1353 screened studies, 16 were selected, featuring interventions such as web-based programs, mobile applications, and online meetings. Positive outcomes were observed in knowledge, stress reduction, self-efficacy, coping, and dietary behaviors. However, mixed results were found for fertility-related stress, depression, and anxiety, with no significant improvements in fertility-related quality of life, health behaviors, and pregnancy rates. While digital interventions show promise, further research is needed to validate their effectiveness through large-scale randomized controlled trials and to develop standardized assessment tools for better implementation and evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49730,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Health Sciences","volume":"27 3","pages":"e70227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.70227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global rise in infertility highlights the need for personalized informational and psychological support. Digital health technology offers a promising avenue; however, knowledge gaps remain regarding optimal delivery methods, outcomes, and limitations. This scoping review synthesizes recent evidence on complementary interventions using technology for individuals with infertility undergoing reproductive technology-assisted interventions and evaluates their effectiveness and limitations. Seven databases were systematically searched to identify studies published in English or Korean between 2000 and December 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist, and data were synthesized using a standardized template. Of 1353 screened studies, 16 were selected, featuring interventions such as web-based programs, mobile applications, and online meetings. Positive outcomes were observed in knowledge, stress reduction, self-efficacy, coping, and dietary behaviors. However, mixed results were found for fertility-related stress, depression, and anxiety, with no significant improvements in fertility-related quality of life, health behaviors, and pregnancy rates. While digital interventions show promise, further research is needed to validate their effectiveness through large-scale randomized controlled trials and to develop standardized assessment tools for better implementation and evaluation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

辅助生殖技术对不孕症患者的辅助干预:范围综述。
全球不孕症的增加突出了对个性化信息和心理支持的需求。数字卫生技术提供了一条很有前途的途径;然而,关于最佳交付方法、结果和局限性的知识差距仍然存在。这篇范围综述综合了利用技术对接受生殖技术辅助干预的不孕症患者进行辅助干预的最新证据,并评估了其有效性和局限性。系统检索了7个数据库,以确定2000年至2023年12月期间用英语或韩语发表的研究。使用Joanna Briggs研究所的检查表评估偏倚风险,并使用标准化模板综合数据。在1353项筛选研究中,选择了16项,其干预措施包括基于网络的程序、移动应用程序和在线会议。在知识、压力减轻、自我效能、应对和饮食行为方面观察到积极的结果。然而,在与生育有关的压力、抑郁和焦虑方面,结果却喜忧参半,在与生育有关的生活质量、健康行为和怀孕率方面没有显著改善。虽然数字干预显示出希望,但需要进一步研究,通过大规模随机对照试验验证其有效性,并开发标准化评估工具,以便更好地实施和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NHS has a multidisciplinary focus and broad scope and a particular focus on the translation of research into clinical practice, inter-disciplinary and multidisciplinary work, primary health care, health promotion, health education, management of communicable and non-communicable diseases, implementation of technological innovations and inclusive multicultural approaches to health services and care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信