The Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Patients Treated with Endovascular Therapy: A RESIST Trial Post Hoc Study.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rolf Ankerlund Blauenfeldt, David Charles Hess, David Gaist, Boris Modrau, Jan Brink Valentin, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Niels Hjort, Anne Brink Behrndtz, Martin Faurholdt Gude, Wenbo Zhao, Jonas Jensen, Grethe Andersen, Claus Ziegler Simonsen
{"title":"The Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Patients Treated with Endovascular Therapy: A RESIST Trial Post Hoc Study.","authors":"Rolf Ankerlund Blauenfeldt, David Charles Hess, David Gaist, Boris Modrau, Jan Brink Valentin, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Niels Hjort, Anne Brink Behrndtz, Martin Faurholdt Gude, Wenbo Zhao, Jonas Jensen, Grethe Andersen, Claus Ziegler Simonsen","doi":"10.1007/s12975-025-01379-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a simple, non-invasive procedure that has been shown to be safe and feasible in multiple smaller clinical trials. Recent large randomized controlled trials have yielded mixed results regarding clinical effect. Patients with severe stroke may experience greater benefit from cerebroprotective interventions, highlighting the need for adjunctive therapies to enhance endovascular therapy (EVT) outcomes. This post hoc analysis of the RESIST trial evaluates the effect of RIC in the subgroup of patients who underwent EVT. Eligible patients were adults (≥ 18 years old), independent in activities of daily living, who had prehospital stroke symptoms with a duration of less than 4 h. They were randomized to RIC or sham. The primary analysis was performed using the entire range (\"shift analysis\") of the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days. A total of 737 patients had acute ischemic stroke, and 134 received EVT. The median (IQR) age was 74 (62, 82) years, median NIHSS was 16 (8, 20), and 52 (39%) were female. Median (IQR) overall adherence to RIC/sham was 81% (56, 96). Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was initiated in 76 out of the 134 (57%) EVT-treated patients. There was no significant effect of RIC on mRS in EVT-treated patients, OR (95% CI) 1.26 (0.68-2.32). When IVT was given in addition to EVT, RIC was associated with improved functional outcome at 90 days, adjusted OR 2.46 (1.05, 5.78), p = 0.038 but not without adjunctive IVT, aOR 0.57 (0.21-1.53). The effect of RIC was present only in patients achieving complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) following EVT and IVT (54 out of 134 patients). RIC treatment in addition to IVT and EVT was associated with significantly improved functional outcome at 90 days, observed only in patients who achieved complete reperfusion. These results should only serve as hypothesis-generating for future trials. ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03481777.</p>","PeriodicalId":23237,"journal":{"name":"Translational Stroke Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Stroke Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-025-01379-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a simple, non-invasive procedure that has been shown to be safe and feasible in multiple smaller clinical trials. Recent large randomized controlled trials have yielded mixed results regarding clinical effect. Patients with severe stroke may experience greater benefit from cerebroprotective interventions, highlighting the need for adjunctive therapies to enhance endovascular therapy (EVT) outcomes. This post hoc analysis of the RESIST trial evaluates the effect of RIC in the subgroup of patients who underwent EVT. Eligible patients were adults (≥ 18 years old), independent in activities of daily living, who had prehospital stroke symptoms with a duration of less than 4 h. They were randomized to RIC or sham. The primary analysis was performed using the entire range ("shift analysis") of the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days. A total of 737 patients had acute ischemic stroke, and 134 received EVT. The median (IQR) age was 74 (62, 82) years, median NIHSS was 16 (8, 20), and 52 (39%) were female. Median (IQR) overall adherence to RIC/sham was 81% (56, 96). Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was initiated in 76 out of the 134 (57%) EVT-treated patients. There was no significant effect of RIC on mRS in EVT-treated patients, OR (95% CI) 1.26 (0.68-2.32). When IVT was given in addition to EVT, RIC was associated with improved functional outcome at 90 days, adjusted OR 2.46 (1.05, 5.78), p = 0.038 but not without adjunctive IVT, aOR 0.57 (0.21-1.53). The effect of RIC was present only in patients achieving complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) following EVT and IVT (54 out of 134 patients). RIC treatment in addition to IVT and EVT was associated with significantly improved functional outcome at 90 days, observed only in patients who achieved complete reperfusion. These results should only serve as hypothesis-generating for future trials. ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03481777.

血管内治疗对患者远程缺血适应的影响:一项抵抗试验的事后研究。
远程缺血调节(RIC)是一种简单、无创的手术,在多个小型临床试验中已被证明是安全可行的。最近的大型随机对照试验对临床效果产生了不同的结果。严重脑卒中患者可能从脑保护干预中获益更大,这突出了辅助治疗以增强血管内治疗(EVT)结果的必要性。这项对RESIST试验的事后分析评估了RIC在EVT患者亚组中的效果。符合条件的患者为成年人(≥18岁),日常生活活动独立,院前卒中症状持续时间小于4小时。他们随机分为RIC组或假手术组。在90天时,使用修改的Rankin量表(mRS)的整个范围(“移位分析”)进行初步分析。共有737例急性缺血性卒中患者,其中134例接受EVT治疗。中位(IQR)年龄为74(62,82)岁,中位NIHSS为16(8,20)岁,女性52例(39%)。RIC/sham的中位(IQR)总体依从性为81%(56,96)。134例接受静脉溶栓治疗的患者中有76例(57%)开始静脉溶栓。在evt治疗的患者中,RIC对mRS没有显著影响,OR (95% CI)为1.26(0.68-2.32)。当在EVT之外给予IVT时,RIC与90天功能结果改善相关,调整OR为2.46 (1.05,5.78),p = 0.038,但没有辅助IVT时,调整OR为0.57(0.21-1.53)。RIC的作用仅存在于EVT和IVT后实现完全再灌注(mtici3)的患者中(134例患者中的54例)。RIC治疗加上IVT和EVT治疗与90天功能结果的显著改善相关,仅在实现完全再灌注的患者中观察到。这些结果只能作为未来试验的假设。ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03481777。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Stroke Research
Translational Stroke Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Stroke Research covers basic, translational, and clinical studies. The Journal emphasizes novel approaches to help both to understand clinical phenomenon through basic science tools, and to translate basic science discoveries into the development of new strategies for the prevention, assessment, treatment, and enhancement of central nervous system repair after stroke and other forms of neurotrauma. Translational Stroke Research focuses on translational research and is relevant to both basic scientists and physicians, including but not restricted to neuroscientists, vascular biologists, neurologists, neuroimagers, and neurosurgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信