Structural integrity and failure of transfemoral prosthetic socket fabricated using carbon prepreg technique: Influence of fiber orientation and curing conditions.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Pimpet Sratong-On, Sawanya Suwannawong, Watcharin Noothong, Jongsak Pakpia, Natasha Shong Wey Mun, Muhammad Aniq Bin Rezaki, Chuen Kum Lee, Kazuhiko Sasaki
{"title":"Structural integrity and failure of transfemoral prosthetic socket fabricated using carbon prepreg technique: Influence of fiber orientation and curing conditions.","authors":"Pimpet Sratong-On, Sawanya Suwannawong, Watcharin Noothong, Jongsak Pakpia, Natasha Shong Wey Mun, Muhammad Aniq Bin Rezaki, Chuen Kum Lee, Kazuhiko Sasaki","doi":"10.1177/09544119251372313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study provides valuable guidance for simplifying fabrication procedures and enhancing the structural integrity and safety of carbon fiber (CF) laminate transfemoral (TF) prosthetic sockets. While the high specific strength of CF laminate sockets offers advantages over conventional plastics, essential production data-their orientation-dependent strength and optimal cure conditions-are lacking, often requiring complex, costly cure cycles. This study investigated (i) the influence of fiber orientation on TF prosthetic CF socket strength via finite element analysis (FEA) during standing, and (ii) optimal single-step Vacuum-Bag-Only (VBO) cure conditions for prepreg in a low-cost conventional oven. Three distinct CF laminates ((45/-45/45/-45), (0/90/0/90), (0/45/-45/90)) were implemented in TF socket finite element (FE) models. Tensile and flexural tests validated FE results and assessed laminate failure modes. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) investigated cure temperatures, while surface voids were inspected to identify optimal single-step cure conditions. A 1-h isothermal cure at 90°C facilitated resin flow and yielded minimal surface voids. FEA revealed ply orientations insignificantly influenced residual limb pressure. Most plies in the (45/-45/45/-45) CF laminate favorably aligned with oblique deformation for TF socket stabilization during standing. Experimentally, it exhibited the lowest stiffness (10.86 GPa) and strength (161.49 MPa). Nevertheless, its strength is superior to other socket materials and enhances safety through clear pre-fracture signs from ductile failure. Maximum pressure of up to 32.2 kPa at the medial-distal site during standing was insufficient to cause discomfort. These findings provide guidelines for high-quality TF sockets using prepreg by simplifying the fabrication process.</p>","PeriodicalId":20666,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"934-951"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119251372313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study provides valuable guidance for simplifying fabrication procedures and enhancing the structural integrity and safety of carbon fiber (CF) laminate transfemoral (TF) prosthetic sockets. While the high specific strength of CF laminate sockets offers advantages over conventional plastics, essential production data-their orientation-dependent strength and optimal cure conditions-are lacking, often requiring complex, costly cure cycles. This study investigated (i) the influence of fiber orientation on TF prosthetic CF socket strength via finite element analysis (FEA) during standing, and (ii) optimal single-step Vacuum-Bag-Only (VBO) cure conditions for prepreg in a low-cost conventional oven. Three distinct CF laminates ((45/-45/45/-45), (0/90/0/90), (0/45/-45/90)) were implemented in TF socket finite element (FE) models. Tensile and flexural tests validated FE results and assessed laminate failure modes. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) investigated cure temperatures, while surface voids were inspected to identify optimal single-step cure conditions. A 1-h isothermal cure at 90°C facilitated resin flow and yielded minimal surface voids. FEA revealed ply orientations insignificantly influenced residual limb pressure. Most plies in the (45/-45/45/-45) CF laminate favorably aligned with oblique deformation for TF socket stabilization during standing. Experimentally, it exhibited the lowest stiffness (10.86 GPa) and strength (161.49 MPa). Nevertheless, its strength is superior to other socket materials and enhances safety through clear pre-fracture signs from ductile failure. Maximum pressure of up to 32.2 kPa at the medial-distal site during standing was insufficient to cause discomfort. These findings provide guidelines for high-quality TF sockets using prepreg by simplifying the fabrication process.

碳预浸料技术制备的经股假体窝的结构完整性和失效:纤维取向和固化条件的影响。
本研究为简化碳纤维(CF)层压经股骨(TF)假体的制作工艺、提高其结构完整性和安全性提供了有价值的指导。虽然CF层压板插座的高比强度比传统塑料具有优势,但缺乏必要的生产数据,如定向强度和最佳固化条件,通常需要复杂、昂贵的固化周期。本研究通过站立时的有限元分析(FEA)研究了纤维取向对TF假体CF窝强度的影响,以及(ii)在低成本传统烤箱中对预浸料进行单步真空袋(VBO)固化的最佳条件。三种不同的CF层压板((45/-45/45/-45),(0/90/0/90),(0/45/-45/90))在TF插座有限元(FE)模型中实现。拉伸和弯曲试验验证了有限元结果,并评估了层合板的破坏模式。差示扫描量热法(DSC)研究了固化温度,同时检查了表面空隙,以确定最佳的单步固化条件。90°C下1小时的等温固化有利于树脂流动,产生最小的表面空隙。有限元分析结果显示,铺层取向对残肢压力影响不显著。大多数层合在(45/-45/45/-45)CF层合板中,有利于倾斜变形,以便在站立时稳定TF插座。实验结果表明,其刚度最低(10.86 GPa),强度最低(161.49 MPa)。然而,它的强度优于其他套筒材料,并通过清晰的韧性破坏前断裂迹象提高了安全性。站立时中端至远端最大压力达32.2 kPa,不足以引起不适。这些发现为使用预浸料简化制作工艺以获得高质量的TF插座提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering in Medicine is an interdisciplinary journal encompassing all aspects of engineering in medicine. The Journal is a vital tool for maintaining an understanding of the newest techniques and research in medical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信