Differential effects of tobacco taxation across educational groups: evidence from Poland.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maciej Albinowski, Piotr Lewandowski, Hana Ross
{"title":"Differential effects of tobacco taxation across educational groups: evidence from Poland.","authors":"Maciej Albinowski, Piotr Lewandowski, Hana Ross","doi":"10.1136/tc-2025-059513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assessing the impact of the recent excise hike in Poland, with particular attention to differences between tertiary-educated and non-tertiary-educated populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use the nationally representative Household Budget Survey data from 2010 to 2022 to estimate changes in smoking behaviour in response to cigarette affordability at both the extensive and intensive margins. Combining these estimates with European Health Interview Survey data, we simulate the effects of excise hikes for smoking prevalence and consumption in 2025-2027.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find that the less-educated population exhibits a higher smoking prevalence but is more responsive to cigarette affordability. For the non-tertiary-educated population, a 10% increase in the ratio of cigarette price to income, that is, a 9.1% reduction in affordability, lowers the probability of households buying cigarettes by 0.61 percentage points (pp), translating into 2.2% fewer smokers. For the tertiary-educated population, such a decline in affordability reduces the probability of buying cigarettes by 0.24 pp and the number of smokers by 1.1%. The reduction of consumption volume among continuing smokers is also larger among the non-tertiary-educated population. We estimate that the excise tax roadmap adopted in 2024, securing a 21% tax increase by 2027, will reduce the number of smokers in Poland by about 250 000, reduce overall cigarette consumption by 8.4% and increase excise revenue by 10.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Poland, increases in the cigarette excise tax will reduce smoking prevalence and consumption volume mainly among the non-tertiary-educated population. Non-economic factors appear to primarily drive the decline in smoking prevalence among tertiary-educated people.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2025-059513","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Assessing the impact of the recent excise hike in Poland, with particular attention to differences between tertiary-educated and non-tertiary-educated populations.

Methods: We use the nationally representative Household Budget Survey data from 2010 to 2022 to estimate changes in smoking behaviour in response to cigarette affordability at both the extensive and intensive margins. Combining these estimates with European Health Interview Survey data, we simulate the effects of excise hikes for smoking prevalence and consumption in 2025-2027.

Results: We find that the less-educated population exhibits a higher smoking prevalence but is more responsive to cigarette affordability. For the non-tertiary-educated population, a 10% increase in the ratio of cigarette price to income, that is, a 9.1% reduction in affordability, lowers the probability of households buying cigarettes by 0.61 percentage points (pp), translating into 2.2% fewer smokers. For the tertiary-educated population, such a decline in affordability reduces the probability of buying cigarettes by 0.24 pp and the number of smokers by 1.1%. The reduction of consumption volume among continuing smokers is also larger among the non-tertiary-educated population. We estimate that the excise tax roadmap adopted in 2024, securing a 21% tax increase by 2027, will reduce the number of smokers in Poland by about 250 000, reduce overall cigarette consumption by 8.4% and increase excise revenue by 10.9%.

Conclusions: In Poland, increases in the cigarette excise tax will reduce smoking prevalence and consumption volume mainly among the non-tertiary-educated population. Non-economic factors appear to primarily drive the decline in smoking prevalence among tertiary-educated people.

烟草税对不同教育群体的不同影响:来自波兰的证据。
目的:评估波兰最近消费税上涨的影响,特别关注受过高等教育和未受过高等教育的人口之间的差异。方法:我们使用2010年至2022年具有全国代表性的家庭预算调查数据来估计吸烟行为在广泛边际和密集边际上对卷烟可负担性的反应。将这些估计与欧洲健康访谈调查数据相结合,我们模拟了2025-2027年消费税上涨对吸烟率和消费的影响。结果:我们发现受教育程度较低的人群吸烟率较高,但对卷烟的可负担性更敏感。对于未受过高等教育的人群,香烟价格与收入之比每提高10%,即负担能力降低9.1%,家庭购买香烟的可能性降低0.61个百分点(pp),即吸烟者减少2.2%。对于受过高等教育的人群来说,这种负担能力的下降使他们购买香烟的概率降低了0.24个百分点,吸烟者的数量降低了1.1%。在未受过高等教育的人群中,持续吸烟者的消费量减少幅度也更大。我们估计,2024年采用的消费税路线图,到2027年将确保21%的税收增长,将使波兰的吸烟者人数减少约25万人,使卷烟总消费量减少8.4%,使消费税收入增加10.9%。结论:在波兰,增加卷烟消费税将减少吸烟率和消费量,主要是在非高等教育人口。非经济因素似乎是导致受过高等教育人群吸烟率下降的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信