Structured magnetic resonance imaging assessment improves diagnosis of pathological complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Moying Li, Tobias Dieckmann, Florian Herrle, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Thomas Hielscher, Alexander Hertel, Sophia Schweitzer, Svetlana Hetjens, Johannes Betge, Sebastian Belle, Nadine Schulte, Christoph Reißfelder, Judit Boda-Heggemann, Constantin Dreher, Christoph Brochhausen, Matthias P Ebert, Matthias F Froelich, Tianzuo Zhan
{"title":"Structured magnetic resonance imaging assessment improves diagnosis of pathological complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.","authors":"Moying Li, Tobias Dieckmann, Florian Herrle, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Thomas Hielscher, Alexander Hertel, Sophia Schweitzer, Svetlana Hetjens, Johannes Betge, Sebastian Belle, Nadine Schulte, Christoph Reißfelder, Judit Boda-Heggemann, Constantin Dreher, Christoph Brochhausen, Matthias P Ebert, Matthias F Froelich, Tianzuo Zhan","doi":"10.1159/000548042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Precise prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in rectal cancer may identify candidates for non-operative management. The optimal selection of diagnostic tools is therefore of major clinical importance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical, laboratory, endoscopic and radiological data of patients with rectal cancer treated with nCRT and surgery at an academic medical center from 2010 to 2020 were retrospectively collected. Pre- and post-nCRT magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was reviewed with a structured report template and assessed by magnetic resonance imaging tumor regression grade (mrTRG). Two senior radiologists reviewed mrTRG independently to determine the inter-reader agreement. Univariate logistic regression was applied to identify parameters that predict pCR. A multivariate prediction model was developed using L1-penalized logistic regression, with performance assessed by area under the curve (AUC) in the total cohort (apparent AUC) and by cross validation (CV-AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 261 patients were identified, of whom 36 achieved pCR. Univariate analysis showed a significant correlation between post-nCRT features with pCR, including radiological T-stage (OR 0.05 [0.02-0.15], p<0.001), mrTRG (OR 0.13 [0.05-0.31], p<0.001) and endoscopic response (OR 0.17 [0.05-0.54], p=0.032). Of those, mrTRG showed the highest AUC of 0.77 with a substantial inter-reader agreement (kappa=0.71, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.81). The multivariate predictive model selected eight pre- and post-nCRT parameters with apparent AUC of 0.84 and CV-AUC of 0.73.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Therapy response assessed by MRI, particularly by mrTRG, strongly predicted pCR. Therefore, mrTRG should be implemented in routine assessment of rectal cancer treated by nCRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Precise prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in rectal cancer may identify candidates for non-operative management. The optimal selection of diagnostic tools is therefore of major clinical importance.

Methods: Clinical, laboratory, endoscopic and radiological data of patients with rectal cancer treated with nCRT and surgery at an academic medical center from 2010 to 2020 were retrospectively collected. Pre- and post-nCRT magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was reviewed with a structured report template and assessed by magnetic resonance imaging tumor regression grade (mrTRG). Two senior radiologists reviewed mrTRG independently to determine the inter-reader agreement. Univariate logistic regression was applied to identify parameters that predict pCR. A multivariate prediction model was developed using L1-penalized logistic regression, with performance assessed by area under the curve (AUC) in the total cohort (apparent AUC) and by cross validation (CV-AUC).

Results: A total of 261 patients were identified, of whom 36 achieved pCR. Univariate analysis showed a significant correlation between post-nCRT features with pCR, including radiological T-stage (OR 0.05 [0.02-0.15], p<0.001), mrTRG (OR 0.13 [0.05-0.31], p<0.001) and endoscopic response (OR 0.17 [0.05-0.54], p=0.032). Of those, mrTRG showed the highest AUC of 0.77 with a substantial inter-reader agreement (kappa=0.71, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.81). The multivariate predictive model selected eight pre- and post-nCRT parameters with apparent AUC of 0.84 and CV-AUC of 0.73.

Conclusion: Therapy response assessed by MRI, particularly by mrTRG, strongly predicted pCR. Therefore, mrTRG should be implemented in routine assessment of rectal cancer treated by nCRT.

结构磁共振成像评估提高了直肠癌新辅助放化疗后病理完全缓解的诊断。
导读:准确预测直肠癌新辅助放化疗(nCRT)后的病理完全缓解(pCR)可以确定非手术治疗的候选人。因此,诊断工具的最佳选择具有重要的临床意义。方法:回顾性收集2010 ~ 2020年某学术医疗中心收治的直肠癌nCRT及手术患者的临床、实验室、内镜及影像学资料。采用结构化报告模板对ncrt前后的磁共振成像(MRI)进行回顾,并通过磁共振成像肿瘤消退等级(mrTRG)进行评估。两位资深放射科医生独立审查了mrTRG,以确定读者间的一致意见。单变量逻辑回归用于识别预测pCR的参数。采用l1惩罚逻辑回归建立了一个多变量预测模型,并通过总队列中的曲线下面积(表观AUC)和交叉验证(CV-AUC)来评估效果。结果:共鉴定出261例患者,其中36例实现pCR。单因素分析显示,ncrt后的特征与pCR有显著相关性,包括放射学t分期(OR 0.05[0.02-0.15])。结论:MRI评估的治疗反应,特别是mrTRG,强烈预测pCR。因此,mrTRG应作为nCRT治疗直肠癌的常规评估手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信