Characterizing the imaging environment for supine breast MRI.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Judith Zimmermann, Jana Vincent, Fraser Robb, Bruce L Daniel, Brian A Hargreaves, Catherine J Moran
{"title":"Characterizing the imaging environment for supine breast MRI.","authors":"Judith Zimmermann, Jana Vincent, Fraser Robb, Bruce L Daniel, Brian A Hargreaves, Catherine J Moran","doi":"10.1002/mrm.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Supine breast MRI has the potential to improve over standard prone breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in terms of efficiency and image quality, image alignment with diagnostic and treatment procedures, and overall accessibility. This study aims to characterize potential technical challenges of imaging in the supine position: (i) <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>B</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_0 $$</annotation></semantics> </math>  field inhomogeneities, (ii) <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msubsup><mrow><mi>B</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow> <mrow><mo>+</mo></mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math>  variations, (iii) respiratory-induced breast motion, and (iv) supine breast geometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten healthy subjects were scanned at 3T in both prone and supine positions to quantify and compare (i) and (ii) between both positions, and to assess (iii) in the supine position. Breast image volumes from a wider population (N = 40, healthy volunteers and patients) were analyzed to obtain breast shape metrics to characterize (iv).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>B</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_0 $$</annotation></semantics> </math>  field inhomogeneity increased from prone positioning (2SD: <math> <semantics><mrow><mn>122</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mtext>Hz</mtext> <mo>±</mo> <mn>25</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mtext>Hz</mtext></mrow> <annotation>$$ 122\\kern0.2em \\mathrm{Hz}\\pm 25\\kern0.2em \\mathrm{Hz} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) to supine positioning (2SD: <math> <semantics><mrow><mn>152</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mtext>Hz</mtext> <mo>±</mo> <mn>15</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mtext>Hz</mtext></mrow> <annotation>$$ 152\\kern0.2em \\mathrm{Hz}\\pm 15\\kern0.2em \\mathrm{Hz} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ), and <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msubsup><mrow><mi>B</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow> <mrow><mo>+</mo></mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math>  flip angle variations (from prescribed <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mn>30</mn></mrow> <mrow><mo>∘</mo></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {30}^{\\circ } $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) were greater in the supine position (2SD ranging <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mn>7</mn></mrow> <mrow><mo>∘</mo></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {7}^{\\circ } $$</annotation></semantics> </math> to <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mn>13</mn></mrow> <mrow><mo>∘</mo></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {13}^{\\circ } $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) than in the prone position (2SD ranging <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mn>6</mn></mrow> <mrow><mo>∘</mo></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {6}^{\\circ } $$</annotation></semantics> </math> to <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mn>8</mn></mrow> <mrow><mo>∘</mo></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {8}^{\\circ } $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ). Breast tissue displacement (median [IQR] across all analyzed locations and subjects) was similar along A-P (1.4 [0.5] mm) and R-L (1.9 [1.5] mm) directions. Breast geometry varied greatly, with the outer breast perimeter ranging from 34 to 68 cm, and maximum breast tissue thickness ranging from 2 to 9 cm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supine positioning for breast MRI may lead to greater <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>B</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_0 $$</annotation></semantics> </math>  inhomogeneities and greater <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msubsup><mrow><mi>B</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow> <mrow><mo>+</mo></mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math>  variations when compared to prone positioning, and breast motion can be substantial. Breast geometry varies greatly among the female population, and shape metrics can inform supine-dedicated coil development.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Supine breast MRI has the potential to improve over standard prone breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in terms of efficiency and image quality, image alignment with diagnostic and treatment procedures, and overall accessibility. This study aims to characterize potential technical challenges of imaging in the supine position: (i) B 0 $$ {\mathrm{B}}_0 $$  field inhomogeneities, (ii) B 1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$  variations, (iii) respiratory-induced breast motion, and (iv) supine breast geometry.

Methods: Ten healthy subjects were scanned at 3T in both prone and supine positions to quantify and compare (i) and (ii) between both positions, and to assess (iii) in the supine position. Breast image volumes from a wider population (N = 40, healthy volunteers and patients) were analyzed to obtain breast shape metrics to characterize (iv).

Results: B 0 $$ {\mathrm{B}}_0 $$  field inhomogeneity increased from prone positioning (2SD: 122 Hz ± 25 Hz $$ 122\kern0.2em \mathrm{Hz}\pm 25\kern0.2em \mathrm{Hz} $$ ) to supine positioning (2SD: 152 Hz ± 15 Hz $$ 152\kern0.2em \mathrm{Hz}\pm 15\kern0.2em \mathrm{Hz} $$ ), and B 1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$  flip angle variations (from prescribed 30 $$ {30}^{\circ } $$ ) were greater in the supine position (2SD ranging 7 $$ {7}^{\circ } $$ to 13 $$ {13}^{\circ } $$ ) than in the prone position (2SD ranging 6 $$ {6}^{\circ } $$ to 8 $$ {8}^{\circ } $$ ). Breast tissue displacement (median [IQR] across all analyzed locations and subjects) was similar along A-P (1.4 [0.5] mm) and R-L (1.9 [1.5] mm) directions. Breast geometry varied greatly, with the outer breast perimeter ranging from 34 to 68 cm, and maximum breast tissue thickness ranging from 2 to 9 cm.

Conclusion: Supine positioning for breast MRI may lead to greater B 0 $$ {\mathrm{B}}_0 $$  inhomogeneities and greater B 1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$  variations when compared to prone positioning, and breast motion can be substantial. Breast geometry varies greatly among the female population, and shape metrics can inform supine-dedicated coil development.

仰卧位乳房MRI成像环境特征分析。
目的:仰卧位乳房MRI在效率和图像质量、图像与诊断和治疗程序的一致性以及总体可及性方面优于标准俯卧位乳房磁共振成像(MRI)。本研究旨在描述仰卧位成像的潜在技术挑战:(i) b1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_0 $$场不均匀性,(ii) b1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$变化,(iii)呼吸引起的乳房运动,以及(iv)仰卧位乳房几何形状。方法:对10名健康受试者进行俯卧位和仰卧位的3T扫描,量化和比较两种体位的(i)和(ii),并评估仰卧位的(iii)。分析来自更广泛人群(N = 40,健康志愿者和患者)的乳房图像体积,以获得乳房形状指标来表征(iv)。结果:b0 $$ {\mathrm{B}}_0 $$场不均匀性从俯卧位(2SD: 122 Hz±25 Hz $$ 122\kern0.2em \mathrm{Hz}\pm 25\kern0.2em \mathrm{Hz} $$)到仰卧位(2SD:152 Hz±15 Hz $$ 152\kern0.2em \mathrm{Hz}\pm 15\kern0.2em \mathrm{Hz} $$)和b1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$翻转角度的变化(从规定的30°$$ {30}^{\circ } $$算起)在仰卧位(2SD范围7°$$ {7}^{\circ } $$到13°$$ {13}^{\circ } $$)比俯卧位(2SD范围6°$$ {6}^{\circ } $$到8°$$ {8}^{\circ } $$)更大。乳腺组织位移(所有分析部位和受试者的中位数[IQR])沿A-P方向(1.4 [0.5]mm)和R-L方向(1.9 [1.5]mm)相似。乳房几何形状差异很大,乳房外周长从34到68厘米不等,最大乳房组织厚度从2到9厘米不等。结论:与俯卧位相比,仰卧位乳房MRI可能导致更大的b0 $$ {\mathrm{B}}_0 $$不均匀性和更大的b1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$变化,乳房运动可能很大。乳房几何形状在女性人群中差异很大,形状指标可以为仰卧专用线圈的发育提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信