Impact of drug utilization management strategies on the incidence and cost of clinical events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation receiving DOACs in the US.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-18 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2558449
Rupesh Subash, Elisabeth Vodicka, Serina Deeba, Chloe Salter, Carissa Dickerson, Ewa Stawowczyk
{"title":"Impact of drug utilization management strategies on the incidence and cost of clinical events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation receiving DOACs in the US.","authors":"Rupesh Subash, Elisabeth Vodicka, Serina Deeba, Chloe Salter, Carissa Dickerson, Ewa Stawowczyk","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2558449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Medicare plans employ drug utilization management strategies, including prior authorization (PA) and step therapy (ST), or formulary tier increases, to control spending. However, PA and ST can delay treatment access and encourage use of less effective/safe therapies, while formulary tier increases can lead to treatment switching/discontinuation due to higher patient out-of-pocket costs. This study modeled the impact of restricted access to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and a tier increase for apixaban, on incidence and cost of clinical events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in the US.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Decision models were developed using hypothetical cohorts of 1,000,000 Medicare Fee-For-Service plan members to evaluate incidence and cost of clinical events of two utilization management strategies over one-year. Model 1 compared restricted access (PA or ST required) versus unrestricted access to DOACs; model 2 compared a formulary tier increase for apixaban (patients assumed to continue apixaban, switch (to any DOAC (primary analysis) or rivaroxaban (secondary analysis)), or discontinue at rates of 57.5%, 12.4%, and 30.1%, respectively) versus no tier increase (patients assumed to continue apixaban). Epidemiology, clinical, and cost inputs were sourced from literature and online databases and costs inflated to 2024 US dollars.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the \"restricted access\" cohort (model 1; <i>n</i> = 67,984) patients experienced an additional 57 strokes, 61 major bleeds (MBs), 43 transient ischemic attacks, and 452 all-cause deaths versus the \"unrestricted access\" cohort, accruing additional annual costs of $8,008,860. A tier increase for apixaban (model 2; <i>n</i> = 47,036) resulted in an additional 330 (secondary analysis: 257) stroke/systemic embolisms, 58 (20) MBs and 32 (25) deaths versus the \"no tier increase\" cohort, costing an additional $6,542,373 ($4,656,305) annually.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with NVAF, PA/ST restrictions for DOACs and a formulary tier increase for apixaban resulted in additional clinical events and higher clinical event-related costs for US Medicare payers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1602-1615"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2558449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Medicare plans employ drug utilization management strategies, including prior authorization (PA) and step therapy (ST), or formulary tier increases, to control spending. However, PA and ST can delay treatment access and encourage use of less effective/safe therapies, while formulary tier increases can lead to treatment switching/discontinuation due to higher patient out-of-pocket costs. This study modeled the impact of restricted access to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and a tier increase for apixaban, on incidence and cost of clinical events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in the US.

Materials and methods: Decision models were developed using hypothetical cohorts of 1,000,000 Medicare Fee-For-Service plan members to evaluate incidence and cost of clinical events of two utilization management strategies over one-year. Model 1 compared restricted access (PA or ST required) versus unrestricted access to DOACs; model 2 compared a formulary tier increase for apixaban (patients assumed to continue apixaban, switch (to any DOAC (primary analysis) or rivaroxaban (secondary analysis)), or discontinue at rates of 57.5%, 12.4%, and 30.1%, respectively) versus no tier increase (patients assumed to continue apixaban). Epidemiology, clinical, and cost inputs were sourced from literature and online databases and costs inflated to 2024 US dollars.

Results: In the "restricted access" cohort (model 1; n = 67,984) patients experienced an additional 57 strokes, 61 major bleeds (MBs), 43 transient ischemic attacks, and 452 all-cause deaths versus the "unrestricted access" cohort, accruing additional annual costs of $8,008,860. A tier increase for apixaban (model 2; n = 47,036) resulted in an additional 330 (secondary analysis: 257) stroke/systemic embolisms, 58 (20) MBs and 32 (25) deaths versus the "no tier increase" cohort, costing an additional $6,542,373 ($4,656,305) annually.

Conclusions: For patients with NVAF, PA/ST restrictions for DOACs and a formulary tier increase for apixaban resulted in additional clinical events and higher clinical event-related costs for US Medicare payers.

药物使用管理策略对美国接受DOACs的非瓣膜性房颤患者临床事件发生率和成本的影响
背景:医疗保险计划采用药物利用管理策略,包括事先授权(PA)和分步治疗(ST),或增加处方级别,以控制支出。然而,PA和ST可能会延迟获得治疗并鼓励使用不太有效/安全的疗法,而由于患者自付费用增加,处方级别的增加可能导致治疗切换/停止。本研究模拟了美国非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者限制直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)和阿哌沙班分级增加对临床事件发生率和成本的影响。方法:采用1,000,000医疗保险按服务收费计划成员的假设队列建立决策模型,评估两种利用管理策略在一年内的临床事件发生率和成本。模型1比较了受限访问(需要PA或ST)与无限制访问doac;模型2比较了阿哌沙班的处方级别增加(假设患者继续阿哌沙班,切换到任何DOAC[主要分析]或利伐沙班[次要分析]),或停药,分别为57.5%,12.4%和30.1%)和没有级别增加(假设患者继续阿哌沙班)。流行病学、临床和成本输入来自文献和在线数据库,成本膨胀至2024美元。结果:在“受限通道”队列(模型1;n = 67,984)中,与“受限通道”队列相比,患者额外经历了57例中风、61例大出血(mb)、43例短暂性脑缺血发作和452例全因死亡,每年额外费用为8,008,860美元。阿哌沙班分级增加(模型2;n = 47,036)导致卒中/全身性栓塞增加330例[二级分析:257例],58亿例mbbs和32亿例死亡,与“未分级增加”的队列相比,每年额外花费6,542,373美元[4,656,305美元]。结论:对于非瓣膜性房颤患者,doac的PA/ST限制和阿哌沙班处方级别的增加导致美国医疗保险支付者额外的临床事件和更高的临床事件相关费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信