Anatomical location of colorectal neoplasia in patients with positive stool test (multitarget stool DNA or fecal immunochemical test) results: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Joseph C Anderson, William M Hisey, Christina M Robinson, Paul J Limburg, Bonny L Kneedler, Lynn F Butterly
{"title":"Anatomical location of colorectal neoplasia in patients with positive stool test (multitarget stool DNA or fecal immunochemical test) results: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.","authors":"Joseph C Anderson, William M Hisey, Christina M Robinson, Paul J Limburg, Bonny L Kneedler, Lynn F Butterly","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.08.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Data comparing the location of polyp yield in patients with positive stool test results can aid screening test selection. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry data to compare the location, left versus right side of the colon, of neoplasia detected on colonoscopy after a multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test or a fecal immunochemical test (FIT), compared with a reference group undergoing colonoscopy without a stool test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our outcomes were advanced lesions (adenomas and/or serrated polyps, including cancer), advanced adenomas, or advanced serrated polyps stratified by location. We examined the prevalence of left- versus right-sided lesions across 3 cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As compared to colonoscopy (n = 68,645), both FIT+ (n = 584) and mt-sDNA+ (n = 1176) patients had higher proportions of advanced lesions and advanced adenomas on both sides of the colon (P < .001). Mt-sDNA+ patients had significantly higher risks for right-sided advanced serrated polyps (odds ratio [OR] = 3.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.67-3.85; colonoscopy [reference]) and right-sided advanced lesions (OR = 3.13; 95% CI, 2.66-3.68; colonoscopy [reference]) as compared to FIT+ (advanced serrated polyps: OR = 1.38; 95% CI, 0.99-1.99 and advanced lesions: OR = 1.84; 95% CI, 1.43-2.37) or colonoscopy (reference). In our main analysis, the colonoscopy-only group had significantly higher odds of each outcome on the right side than the left side; in comparison, the odds for FIT+ and mt-sDNA+ patients were more evenly distributed throughout the colon.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that FIT+ tests are associated with higher detection of both right- and left-sided advanced adenomas as compared to colonoscopy without a prior stool test. Furthermore, mt-sDNA+ patients had higher proportions of left- and right-sided advanced adenomas and advanced serrated polyps, particularly on the right side.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.08.043","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Data comparing the location of polyp yield in patients with positive stool test results can aid screening test selection. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry data to compare the location, left versus right side of the colon, of neoplasia detected on colonoscopy after a multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test or a fecal immunochemical test (FIT), compared with a reference group undergoing colonoscopy without a stool test.

Methods: Our outcomes were advanced lesions (adenomas and/or serrated polyps, including cancer), advanced adenomas, or advanced serrated polyps stratified by location. We examined the prevalence of left- versus right-sided lesions across 3 cohorts.

Results: As compared to colonoscopy (n = 68,645), both FIT+ (n = 584) and mt-sDNA+ (n = 1176) patients had higher proportions of advanced lesions and advanced adenomas on both sides of the colon (P < .001). Mt-sDNA+ patients had significantly higher risks for right-sided advanced serrated polyps (odds ratio [OR] = 3.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.67-3.85; colonoscopy [reference]) and right-sided advanced lesions (OR = 3.13; 95% CI, 2.66-3.68; colonoscopy [reference]) as compared to FIT+ (advanced serrated polyps: OR = 1.38; 95% CI, 0.99-1.99 and advanced lesions: OR = 1.84; 95% CI, 1.43-2.37) or colonoscopy (reference). In our main analysis, the colonoscopy-only group had significantly higher odds of each outcome on the right side than the left side; in comparison, the odds for FIT+ and mt-sDNA+ patients were more evenly distributed throughout the colon.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that FIT+ tests are associated with higher detection of both right- and left-sided advanced adenomas as compared to colonoscopy without a prior stool test. Furthermore, mt-sDNA+ patients had higher proportions of left- and right-sided advanced adenomas and advanced serrated polyps, particularly on the right side.

粪便试验阳性(mt-sDNA或FIT)患者结直肠肿瘤的解剖位置:来自新罕布什尔结肠镜登记的数据。
背景和目的:比较粪便试验阳性患者息肉产率的位置可以帮助筛选试验的选择。我们对新罕布什尔结肠镜检查登记处的数据进行了横断面分析,以比较mt-sDNA+或FIT+测试后结肠镜检查发现的瘤变的位置,与没有粪便测试的结肠镜检查对照组相比,结肠左侧和右侧。方法:我们的结果是晚期病变(腺瘤和/或锯齿状息肉,包括癌症),晚期腺瘤(AA)或晚期锯齿状息肉(ASP),按部位分层。我们在三个队列中检查了左侧和右侧病变的患病率。结果:与结肠镜检查(n=68,645)相比,FIT+ (n=584)和mt-sDNA+ (n=1,176)患者在结肠两侧的晚期病变和AAs的比例更高(结论:我们的数据表明,与没有事先进行粪便检查的结肠镜检查相比,FIT+检查与更高的左右侧AAs检测相关。此外,mt-sDNA+患者的左右侧aa和asp发生率更高,尤其是在右侧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信