François Therrien, Pratap Chokka, Jeffrey Habert, Zahinoor Ismail, Roger S McIntyre, Jennifer Dine, T Michelle Brown, Zhen Zhang, Erin M MacKenzie, Caroline L Ward
{"title":"Patient-reported efficacy of adjunctive brexpiprazole in major depressive disorder in a phase 4, open-label, interventional study.","authors":"François Therrien, Pratap Chokka, Jeffrey Habert, Zahinoor Ismail, Roger S McIntyre, Jennifer Dine, T Michelle Brown, Zhen Zhang, Erin M MacKenzie, Caroline L Ward","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2558140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In ENGAGE, patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) demonstrated improvements in patient-reported depression and life engagement while taking adjunctive brexpiprazole. This analysis aimed to further characterize patient perspectives on the effects of adjunctive brexpiprazole, using patient diary data from ENGAGE, and describe the development of a 'word of the day' activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prior to ENGAGE, word lists describing a 'good,' 'average,' and 'bad' day with depression were generated from semi-structured interviews with patients with MDD. ENGAGE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04830215) was an 8-week, phase 4, single-arm, open-label study of adjunctive brexpiprazole 0.5-2 mg/day in patients with MDD and inadequate response to antidepressant treatment. Patient diaries were completed periodically at home, comprising the Patient Global Impression - Severity of illness (PGI-S), Patient Global Impression - Improvement (PGI-I), and a 'word of the day' activity in which patients selected one word to describe how they felt that day. This analysis evaluated mean change in PGI-S scores (mixed model for repeated measures), mean PGI-I scores (descriptive statistics), PGI-S response and PGI-S sustained response (Kaplan-Meier), PGI-I response (normal approximation), and 'word of the day' (descriptive statistics).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the interviews, 20 patients used 132 words to describe living with depression. Five words of each valence (positive, neutral, negative) were selected for ENGAGE. 122 patients were enrolled in ENGAGE; 120 had evaluable diary data. PGI-S score improved from baseline to week 8 (least squares mean change [standard error]: -1.5 [0.2]; nominal <i>p</i> < 0.001; effect size: 1.04). PGI-I scores at week 8 indicated 'minimal improvement' to 'much improvement' (mean [standard deviation]: 2.6 [1.1]). At week 8, rates of PGI-S response, sustained PGI-S response, and PGI-I response were 86.0% (95% confidence interval: 77.1, 92.8), 67.9% (54.5, 80.6), and 47.1% (38.1, 56.0), respectively. On 'word of the day,' the proportion of positive and neutral words increased from baseline to week 8, and the proportion of negative words decreased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient-reported diary data revealed early and sustained improvements in depressive symptom severity during 8 weeks of adjunctive brexpiprazole treatment. 'Word of the day' may be an effective qualitative tool for future trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2558140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: In ENGAGE, patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) demonstrated improvements in patient-reported depression and life engagement while taking adjunctive brexpiprazole. This analysis aimed to further characterize patient perspectives on the effects of adjunctive brexpiprazole, using patient diary data from ENGAGE, and describe the development of a 'word of the day' activity.
Methods: Prior to ENGAGE, word lists describing a 'good,' 'average,' and 'bad' day with depression were generated from semi-structured interviews with patients with MDD. ENGAGE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04830215) was an 8-week, phase 4, single-arm, open-label study of adjunctive brexpiprazole 0.5-2 mg/day in patients with MDD and inadequate response to antidepressant treatment. Patient diaries were completed periodically at home, comprising the Patient Global Impression - Severity of illness (PGI-S), Patient Global Impression - Improvement (PGI-I), and a 'word of the day' activity in which patients selected one word to describe how they felt that day. This analysis evaluated mean change in PGI-S scores (mixed model for repeated measures), mean PGI-I scores (descriptive statistics), PGI-S response and PGI-S sustained response (Kaplan-Meier), PGI-I response (normal approximation), and 'word of the day' (descriptive statistics).
Results: In the interviews, 20 patients used 132 words to describe living with depression. Five words of each valence (positive, neutral, negative) were selected for ENGAGE. 122 patients were enrolled in ENGAGE; 120 had evaluable diary data. PGI-S score improved from baseline to week 8 (least squares mean change [standard error]: -1.5 [0.2]; nominal p < 0.001; effect size: 1.04). PGI-I scores at week 8 indicated 'minimal improvement' to 'much improvement' (mean [standard deviation]: 2.6 [1.1]). At week 8, rates of PGI-S response, sustained PGI-S response, and PGI-I response were 86.0% (95% confidence interval: 77.1, 92.8), 67.9% (54.5, 80.6), and 47.1% (38.1, 56.0), respectively. On 'word of the day,' the proportion of positive and neutral words increased from baseline to week 8, and the proportion of negative words decreased.
Conclusions: Patient-reported diary data revealed early and sustained improvements in depressive symptom severity during 8 weeks of adjunctive brexpiprazole treatment. 'Word of the day' may be an effective qualitative tool for future trials.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance