Advances in Musculoskeletal Modeling of the Thoraco-Lumbar Spine: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Linda Carpenedo, Dominika Ignasiak, Robin Remus, Luigi La Barbera
{"title":"Advances in Musculoskeletal Modeling of the Thoraco-Lumbar Spine: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.","authors":"Linda Carpenedo, Dominika Ignasiak, Robin Remus, Luigi La Barbera","doi":"10.1007/s10439-025-03818-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding spine biomechanics is essential for maintaining posture under static and dynamic conditions, relying on a balance of muscular and gravitational forces. Computational musculoskeletal (MSK) models are increasingly being used in biomechanical research as non-invasive alternatives to in vivo and in vitro methods. Two main MSK modeling strategies are multibody (MB) models, which simplify the spine using rigid vertebrae and intervertebral joints to study muscle recruitment, and finite element (FE) models, which provide detailed tissue representation but often rely on oversimplified loading conditions. Recently, coupled (C) models integrating MB and FE approaches have emerged, though they face technical integration challenges. This literature review examines thoracolumbar MSK modeling methods-MB, FE, and C-to outline current practices, evaluate model capabilities, and inform future research and development. Most reviewed models have been published since 2016, reflecting the growing interest and advances in computational spine biomechanics. While certain modeling choices (e.g., the representation of body weight) are consistent across studies, considerable variability remains in other aspects (e.g., the depiction of muscular architecture, including the selection of muscle groups and the number of fascicles used). Despite being critical for model credibility, validation is often constrained by the limited availability of experimental data. Finally, the review highlights emerging directions such as modeling more complex functional tasks, personalizing anatomical and mechanical properties, and promoting Open Science to enhance reproducibility and collaboration in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-025-03818-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding spine biomechanics is essential for maintaining posture under static and dynamic conditions, relying on a balance of muscular and gravitational forces. Computational musculoskeletal (MSK) models are increasingly being used in biomechanical research as non-invasive alternatives to in vivo and in vitro methods. Two main MSK modeling strategies are multibody (MB) models, which simplify the spine using rigid vertebrae and intervertebral joints to study muscle recruitment, and finite element (FE) models, which provide detailed tissue representation but often rely on oversimplified loading conditions. Recently, coupled (C) models integrating MB and FE approaches have emerged, though they face technical integration challenges. This literature review examines thoracolumbar MSK modeling methods-MB, FE, and C-to outline current practices, evaluate model capabilities, and inform future research and development. Most reviewed models have been published since 2016, reflecting the growing interest and advances in computational spine biomechanics. While certain modeling choices (e.g., the representation of body weight) are consistent across studies, considerable variability remains in other aspects (e.g., the depiction of muscular architecture, including the selection of muscle groups and the number of fascicles used). Despite being critical for model credibility, validation is often constrained by the limited availability of experimental data. Finally, the review highlights emerging directions such as modeling more complex functional tasks, personalizing anatomical and mechanical properties, and promoting Open Science to enhance reproducibility and collaboration in the field.

胸腰椎肌肉骨骼模型的研究进展:一个全面的系统综述。
了解脊柱生物力学对于在静态和动态条件下保持姿势至关重要,这依赖于肌肉和重力的平衡。计算肌肉骨骼(MSK)模型越来越多地被用于生物力学研究,作为体内和体外方法的非侵入性替代品。两种主要的MSK建模策略是多体模型(MB)和有限元模型(FE),多体模型使用刚性椎骨和椎间关节来简化脊柱,以研究肌肉恢复;有限元模型提供详细的组织表示,但往往依赖于过于简化的加载条件。最近,集成MB和FE方法的耦合(C)模型已经出现,尽管它们面临技术集成的挑战。本文综述了胸腰椎MSK建模方法(mb、FE和c),概述了当前的实践,评估了模型的能力,并为未来的研究和发展提供了信息。大多数被审查的模型自2016年以来发表,反映了对计算脊柱生物力学日益增长的兴趣和进步。虽然某些建模选择(例如,体重的表示)在研究中是一致的,但在其他方面仍然存在相当大的差异(例如,肌肉结构的描述,包括肌肉群的选择和使用的肌束数量)。尽管对模型可信度至关重要,但验证往往受到实验数据有限可用性的限制。最后,综述强调了新兴方向,如建模更复杂的功能任务,个性化解剖和力学特性,以及促进开放科学以增强该领域的可重复性和协作性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Biomedical Engineering is an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishing original articles in the major fields of bioengineering and biomedical engineering. The Annals is an interdisciplinary and international journal with the aim to highlight integrated approaches to the solutions of biological and biomedical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信