Histoplasma capsulatum seroprevalence in free-roaming cats from 2 endemic regions.

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Jillian Myers Smith, Andrew Hanzlicek, Jennifer Weisent, Sarah Schmid, Xiaojuan Zhu, Lauren Courtney
{"title":"Histoplasma capsulatum seroprevalence in free-roaming cats from 2 endemic regions.","authors":"Jillian Myers Smith, Andrew Hanzlicek, Jennifer Weisent, Sarah Schmid, Xiaojuan Zhu, Lauren Courtney","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.25.06.0222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate Histoplasma seroprevalence and associated risk factors in free-roaming cats from 2 endemic regions: north central Oklahoma and eastern Tennessee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seroprevalence was determined using frozen serum samples from trap, neuter, release programs in Tennessee (n = 426) and Oklahoma (200) from 2013 to 2024. For Tennessee samples, those with complete signalment information were included. For Oklahoma samples, no demographic information was available. An anti-Histoplasma immunoglobulin G antibody enzyme immunoassay was used to evaluate for the presence of anti-Histoplasma immunoglobulin G, and results were categorized as positive, intermediate, or negative. The Fisher exact test was used to assess risk factor associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 51 of 626 (8.1%) tested positive or intermediate, and 575 of 626 (91.9%) were negative. Of the samples from Tennessee, 24 of 403 (6.0%) were seropositive. From Oklahoma, 4 of 200 (2.0%) were seropositive. Of 47 Tennessee samples with positive or intermediate results, the median was 10.3 ELISA units/mL (EU; range, 8 to 31.1; positive, ≥ 10.0 EU), and of 4 Oklahoma samples with positive or intermediate results, the median was 20.3 EU (range, 18.8 to 22.6). There was no association between retrovirus infection, sex, pregnancy status, or presence of injury/disease and Histoplasma seropositivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study is the first to document seropositivity of this regionally endemic fungus in free-roaming cats. Additional studies are encouraged to evaluate if similar seroprevalence is seen in indoor cats and if seropositivity is associated with clinical infection.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Given the reported seroprevalence of histoplasmosis in felines, continued monitoring for Histoplasma infection by veterinary practitioners is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.25.06.0222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate Histoplasma seroprevalence and associated risk factors in free-roaming cats from 2 endemic regions: north central Oklahoma and eastern Tennessee.

Methods: Seroprevalence was determined using frozen serum samples from trap, neuter, release programs in Tennessee (n = 426) and Oklahoma (200) from 2013 to 2024. For Tennessee samples, those with complete signalment information were included. For Oklahoma samples, no demographic information was available. An anti-Histoplasma immunoglobulin G antibody enzyme immunoassay was used to evaluate for the presence of anti-Histoplasma immunoglobulin G, and results were categorized as positive, intermediate, or negative. The Fisher exact test was used to assess risk factor associations.

Results: In total, 51 of 626 (8.1%) tested positive or intermediate, and 575 of 626 (91.9%) were negative. Of the samples from Tennessee, 24 of 403 (6.0%) were seropositive. From Oklahoma, 4 of 200 (2.0%) were seropositive. Of 47 Tennessee samples with positive or intermediate results, the median was 10.3 ELISA units/mL (EU; range, 8 to 31.1; positive, ≥ 10.0 EU), and of 4 Oklahoma samples with positive or intermediate results, the median was 20.3 EU (range, 18.8 to 22.6). There was no association between retrovirus infection, sex, pregnancy status, or presence of injury/disease and Histoplasma seropositivity.

Conclusions: Our study is the first to document seropositivity of this regionally endemic fungus in free-roaming cats. Additional studies are encouraged to evaluate if similar seroprevalence is seen in indoor cats and if seropositivity is associated with clinical infection.

Clinical relevance: Given the reported seroprevalence of histoplasmosis in felines, continued monitoring for Histoplasma infection by veterinary practitioners is warranted.

2个流行地区流浪猫荚膜组织浆体血清阳性率。
目的:本研究的目的是调查来自俄克拉荷马州中北部和田纳西州东部两个流行地区的自由流浪猫的组织浆体血清阳性率及其相关危险因素。方法:采用2013 - 2024年在田纳西州(n = 426)和俄克拉荷马州(n = 200)的诱捕、中性和释放项目的冷冻血清样本测定血清阳性率。对于田纳西州的样本,包括那些完整的信号信息。对于俄克拉荷马州的样本,没有可用的人口统计信息。抗组织浆免疫球蛋白G抗体酶免疫测定用于评估抗组织浆免疫球蛋白G的存在,结果分为阳性、中间或阴性。使用Fisher精确检验来评估风险因素的相关性。结果:626例中阳性或中间阳性51例(8.1%),阴性575例(91.9%)。来自田纳西州的403份样本中,24份(6.0%)血清阳性。来自俄克拉何马州,200人中有4人(2.0%)血清阳性。在田纳西州47份阳性或中间结果的样本中,中位数为10.3 ELISA单位/mL (EU;范围为8至31.1;阳性,≥10.0 EU),而在俄克拉荷马州4份阳性或中间结果的样本中,中位数为20.3 EU(范围为18.8至22.6)。逆转录病毒感染、性别、妊娠状况或有无损伤/疾病与组织浆体血清阳性无关联。结论:我们的研究首次记录了这种区域性地方性真菌在自由漫游的猫中的血清阳性。鼓励进一步的研究来评估是否在室内猫中发现类似的血清阳性率,以及血清阳性是否与临床感染有关。临床相关性:鉴于报告的组织浆体病在猫的血清患病率,兽医从业人员继续监测组织浆体感染是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信