Jordann Brendecke, Xiquan Dong, Baike Xi, Xiang Zhong, Howard W. Barker, Jiangnan Li, Peter Pilewskie
{"title":"Analysis of CCCma Radiative Transfer Calculations for Low-Level Overcast Liquid Clouds Over ARM SGP and ENA Sites","authors":"Jordann Brendecke, Xiquan Dong, Baike Xi, Xiang Zhong, Howard W. Barker, Jiangnan Li, Peter Pilewskie","doi":"10.1029/2025JD044121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study uses the Canadian Centre for Climate Modeling and Analysis (CCCma) radiative transfer model to estimate shortwave flux for low-level overcast liquid clouds. Calculations are evaluated against measurements at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Southern Great Plains (SGP, land) and Eastern North Atlantic (ENA, ocean) sites, as well as top of atmosphere (TOA) fluxes inferred from Clouds and Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) from 2014 to 2023. Mean observed surface (TOA) SW fluxes for the selected cases are 235.7 W m<sup>−2</sup> (473.8 W m<sup>−2</sup>) at SGP and 348.7 W m<sup>−2</sup> (356.4 W m<sup>−2</sup>) at ENA. Cloud microphysical properties retrieved from CERES MODIS are input into the CCCma using three assumed profiles: (a) cloud droplet effective radius (<i>r</i><sub><i>e</i></sub>) and liquid water content (LWC) constant with height, (b) LWC and <i>r</i><sub><i>e</i></sub> increasing linearly with height, and (c) LWC and <i>r</i><sub><i>e</i></sub> increasing linearly from cloud base to ¾ height and then decreasing linearly up to cloud top. Overall, Method 3 produces the least error variance at both sites. At SGP, mean bias and root mean square error (RMSE) are −5.0 and 44.6 W m<sup>−2</sup> at the surface and −4.6 and 25.4 W m<sup>−2</sup> at TOA. At ENA, errors are +0.2 and 121.3 W m<sup>−2</sup> at the surface and −8.0 and 26.1 W m<sup>−2</sup> at TOA. Further screening cases with good agreement between satellite- and surface-based cloud properties, RMSEs for surface fluxes decrease to 24.3 and 25.8 W m<sup>−2</sup> at SGP and ENA. Comparisons with CERES Fu-Liou calculations showed overall better performance by the CCCma, especially at ENA.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JD044121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study uses the Canadian Centre for Climate Modeling and Analysis (CCCma) radiative transfer model to estimate shortwave flux for low-level overcast liquid clouds. Calculations are evaluated against measurements at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Southern Great Plains (SGP, land) and Eastern North Atlantic (ENA, ocean) sites, as well as top of atmosphere (TOA) fluxes inferred from Clouds and Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) from 2014 to 2023. Mean observed surface (TOA) SW fluxes for the selected cases are 235.7 W m−2 (473.8 W m−2) at SGP and 348.7 W m−2 (356.4 W m−2) at ENA. Cloud microphysical properties retrieved from CERES MODIS are input into the CCCma using three assumed profiles: (a) cloud droplet effective radius (re) and liquid water content (LWC) constant with height, (b) LWC and re increasing linearly with height, and (c) LWC and re increasing linearly from cloud base to ¾ height and then decreasing linearly up to cloud top. Overall, Method 3 produces the least error variance at both sites. At SGP, mean bias and root mean square error (RMSE) are −5.0 and 44.6 W m−2 at the surface and −4.6 and 25.4 W m−2 at TOA. At ENA, errors are +0.2 and 121.3 W m−2 at the surface and −8.0 and 26.1 W m−2 at TOA. Further screening cases with good agreement between satellite- and surface-based cloud properties, RMSEs for surface fluxes decrease to 24.3 and 25.8 W m−2 at SGP and ENA. Comparisons with CERES Fu-Liou calculations showed overall better performance by the CCCma, especially at ENA.
本研究使用加拿大气候模拟与分析中心(CCCma)的辐射传输模式来估计低空阴云液体云的短波通量。根据2014年至2023年大气辐射测量南部大平原(SGP,陆地)和北大西洋东部(ENA,海洋)站点的测量结果,以及从云和地球辐射能系统(CERES)推断的大气顶部(TOA)通量,对计算结果进行了评估。所选病例的平均观测表面(TOA) SW通量在SGP为235.7 W m−2 (473.8 W m−2),在ENA为348.7 W m−2 (356.4 W m−2)。从CERES MODIS获取的云微物理特性使用三个假设剖面输入CCCma: (a)云滴有效半径(re)和液态水含量(LWC)随高度恒定,(b) LWC和re随高度线性增加,(c) LWC和re从云底到3 / 4高度线性增加,然后在云顶线性减少。总的来说,方法3在两个地点产生的误差方差最小。在SGP,平均偏差和均方根误差(RMSE)在地表为- 5.0和44.6 W m−2,在TOA为- 4.6和25.4 W m−2。在ENA,表面误差分别为+0.2和121.3 W m−2,TOA误差分别为- 8.0和26.1 W m−2。进一步筛选卫星云和地面云特性之间一致性较好的情况,在SGP和ENA,地面通量的rmse分别降至24.3和25.8 W m−2。与CERES Fu-Liou计算的比较表明,CCCma的总体性能更好,特别是在ENA。
期刊介绍:
JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.