Soil thickness and porosity as indicators of the ecological restoration success: The case study of a reclaimed coal-mine slope in a Mediterranean area

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Daphne López-Marcos , María-Belén Turrión , Juan García-Duro , Carolina Martínez-Ruiz
{"title":"Soil thickness and porosity as indicators of the ecological restoration success: The case study of a reclaimed coal-mine slope in a Mediterranean area","authors":"Daphne López-Marcos ,&nbsp;María-Belén Turrión ,&nbsp;Juan García-Duro ,&nbsp;Carolina Martínez-Ruiz","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Open-cast mine ecological restoration is challenging due to the total removal of vegetation and soil. Thus, restoring soil functionality is a key goal to underpin long-term ecosystem resilience. Understanding soil properties change during the revegetation process is essential for evaluating restoration success efforts and guiding adaptive management based on reliable soil indicators. We assessed two vegetation patches representing distinct successional stages –grassland (pioneer) and shrubland (mature)– on the same mine slope restored eleven years prior. Within each patch, 18 plots (3 transects × 6 sampling units) were established to analyse topography, plant family cover, and soil physicochemical properties. Soil thickness and porosity emerged as the most explicative indicators (20 % and 17 %, respectively) for vegetation cover variance. These were also strongly associated with both functional soil recovery indicators (C/N ratio, cation exchange capacity, available water) and vegetation progression indicators (Fabaceae and Poaceae %cover), based on structural equation modeling and principal component analysis. Fabaceae and other families, typically associated with late-successional stages, were linked to low porosity and deeper soils, while Poaceae and Asteraceae, indicative of early successional stages, were associated with high porosity and shallow soils. We propose soil thickness and porosity as cost-effective and easily measurable indicators for monitoring ecological restoration on post-mining slopes, as they reflect both soil recovery and vegetation dynamics. We also recommend their inclusion in restoration monitoring protocols to support adaptive management and improve alignment with international ecological restoration standards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 107783"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425002733","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Open-cast mine ecological restoration is challenging due to the total removal of vegetation and soil. Thus, restoring soil functionality is a key goal to underpin long-term ecosystem resilience. Understanding soil properties change during the revegetation process is essential for evaluating restoration success efforts and guiding adaptive management based on reliable soil indicators. We assessed two vegetation patches representing distinct successional stages –grassland (pioneer) and shrubland (mature)– on the same mine slope restored eleven years prior. Within each patch, 18 plots (3 transects × 6 sampling units) were established to analyse topography, plant family cover, and soil physicochemical properties. Soil thickness and porosity emerged as the most explicative indicators (20 % and 17 %, respectively) for vegetation cover variance. These were also strongly associated with both functional soil recovery indicators (C/N ratio, cation exchange capacity, available water) and vegetation progression indicators (Fabaceae and Poaceae %cover), based on structural equation modeling and principal component analysis. Fabaceae and other families, typically associated with late-successional stages, were linked to low porosity and deeper soils, while Poaceae and Asteraceae, indicative of early successional stages, were associated with high porosity and shallow soils. We propose soil thickness and porosity as cost-effective and easily measurable indicators for monitoring ecological restoration on post-mining slopes, as they reflect both soil recovery and vegetation dynamics. We also recommend their inclusion in restoration monitoring protocols to support adaptive management and improve alignment with international ecological restoration standards.

Abstract Image

土壤厚度和孔隙度作为生态恢复成功的指标——以地中海地区某采煤边坡为例
露天矿的生态恢复是一个具有挑战性的问题,因为露天矿的植被和土壤都被彻底清除了。因此,恢复土壤功能是支撑生态系统长期恢复力的关键目标。了解植被恢复过程中土壤性质的变化对于评估恢复成效和指导基于可靠土壤指标的适应性管理至关重要。在11年前恢复的同一矿山边坡上,我们评估了代表不同演替阶段的两个植被斑块——草地(先锋)和灌木(成熟)。在每个斑块内建立18个样块(3个样块× 6个样块),分析地形、植物科覆盖和土壤理化性质。土壤厚度和孔隙度是最能说明植被覆盖变化的指标(分别占20%和17%)。基于结构方程建模和主成分分析,这些指标与土壤功能恢复指标(C/N比、阳离子交换量、有效水分)和植被发育指标(豆科和禾科%盖度)均有较强的相关性。豆科和菊科具有较强的孔隙度和较浅的土层特征,具有典型的演替后期特征,而禾本科和菊科具有演替早期特征,具有较高的孔隙度和较浅的土层特征。我们建议将土壤厚度和孔隙度作为监测采矿后边坡生态恢复的成本效益和易于测量的指标,因为它们反映了土壤恢复和植被动态。我们还建议将它们纳入恢复监测协议,以支持适应性管理,并改善与国际生态恢复标准的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信