Lie Xiao , Xuxu Min , Zhanbin Li , Peng Li , Shu Yu , Jianye Ma , Zhou Wang
{"title":"The impact of seasonal variation and forest type on soil organic carbon mineralization in typical forest ecosystems on the Chinese Loess Plateau","authors":"Lie Xiao , Xuxu Min , Zhanbin Li , Peng Li , Shu Yu , Jianye Ma , Zhou Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The mineralization of soil organic carbon (SOC) is essential in the global carbon cycle. The forest type, season, and soil properties affect the characteristics of SOC mineralization in forest ecosystems, but their relative contributions remain unknown. In this study, soil samples from three typical forest types, <em>Pinus tabulaeformis</em> forest (PTF), <em>Quercus acutissima</em> forest (QAF), and mixed <em>P. tabulaeformis</em> and <em>Q. acutissima</em> forest (MF), were collected from China’s Loess Plateau throughout four seasons. Soil physicochemical factors, enzyme activity, microbial community composition, and SOC mineralization characteristics were investigated. Forest type, season, and their interactions significantly affected cumulative carbon mineralization (C<sub>m</sub>) and potentially mineralizable carbon (C<sub>0</sub>). Only seasonal variations significantly affected the mineralization rate constant (K). C<sub>m</sub> and C<sub>0</sub> were highest in spring, whereas the K values were highest in summer. Interestingly, the QAF forest had substantially lower C<sub>m</sub> and C<sub>0</sub> values in summer than the PTF and MF forests. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to determine the effects of forest type and season on SOC mineralization characteristics. SEMs explained 88%, 84%, and 58% of the variation in C<sub>m</sub>, C<sub>0</sub>, and K, respectively. The standardized total effects of season and forest type were −0.735 and −0.047 for C<sub>m</sub>, −0.485 and −0.004 for C<sub>0</sub>, and −0.446 and −0.117 for K. These findings show that on the Loess Plateau, seasonal fluctuations have a greater impact on SOC mineralization than forest type. They indicate that compared to coniferous and mixed forest types, broad-leaved forests had a relatively lower capacity for carbon mineralization. Our knowledge of the role of various environmental factors in controlling SOC dynamics in forest ecosystems is expanded by these studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 114176"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25011082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The mineralization of soil organic carbon (SOC) is essential in the global carbon cycle. The forest type, season, and soil properties affect the characteristics of SOC mineralization in forest ecosystems, but their relative contributions remain unknown. In this study, soil samples from three typical forest types, Pinus tabulaeformis forest (PTF), Quercus acutissima forest (QAF), and mixed P. tabulaeformis and Q. acutissima forest (MF), were collected from China’s Loess Plateau throughout four seasons. Soil physicochemical factors, enzyme activity, microbial community composition, and SOC mineralization characteristics were investigated. Forest type, season, and their interactions significantly affected cumulative carbon mineralization (Cm) and potentially mineralizable carbon (C0). Only seasonal variations significantly affected the mineralization rate constant (K). Cm and C0 were highest in spring, whereas the K values were highest in summer. Interestingly, the QAF forest had substantially lower Cm and C0 values in summer than the PTF and MF forests. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to determine the effects of forest type and season on SOC mineralization characteristics. SEMs explained 88%, 84%, and 58% of the variation in Cm, C0, and K, respectively. The standardized total effects of season and forest type were −0.735 and −0.047 for Cm, −0.485 and −0.004 for C0, and −0.446 and −0.117 for K. These findings show that on the Loess Plateau, seasonal fluctuations have a greater impact on SOC mineralization than forest type. They indicate that compared to coniferous and mixed forest types, broad-leaved forests had a relatively lower capacity for carbon mineralization. Our knowledge of the role of various environmental factors in controlling SOC dynamics in forest ecosystems is expanded by these studies.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.