{"title":"Racialized exposure to multiple COVID-19 deaths and their consequences for mental health","authors":"Matthew K. Grace , Danny Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>COVID-19 unleashed a bereavement crisis on a scale unseen in over a century. While evidence suggests COVID-19 deaths are acutely damaging to well-being, it is unclear how multiple losses affect mental health, whether there are ethnoracial differences in cumulative loss, or if the association between multiple COVID-related deaths and psychological distress varies by race-ethnicity. Using national survey data (n = 1810) collected following the Omicron surge in the United States, we estimate a series of regression models to assess the association between multiple COVID-19 losses and psychological distress, racial-ethnic differences in aggregate death exposure, and differential vulnerability to multiple losses across racial-ethnic groups. We find that each additional COVID-19 death is linked to elevated depressive symptoms, anxiety, and anger. Bivariate analyses further indicate Black and Latine respondents experienced significantly more COVID-19 losses relative to White and Asian respondents, although the difference between Latine and Asian participants was attenuated following adjustment for sociodemographic factors. Whereas COVID-19 losses do not hold stronger associations with distress among Black or Asian respondents relative to White participants, the magnitude of the association between COVID-19 bereavement and each measure of distress is significantly larger among Latine respondents relative to their Black and White counterparts. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding the racialized nature of pandemic loss and its psychological sequelae.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 118532"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625008639","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
COVID-19 unleashed a bereavement crisis on a scale unseen in over a century. While evidence suggests COVID-19 deaths are acutely damaging to well-being, it is unclear how multiple losses affect mental health, whether there are ethnoracial differences in cumulative loss, or if the association between multiple COVID-related deaths and psychological distress varies by race-ethnicity. Using national survey data (n = 1810) collected following the Omicron surge in the United States, we estimate a series of regression models to assess the association between multiple COVID-19 losses and psychological distress, racial-ethnic differences in aggregate death exposure, and differential vulnerability to multiple losses across racial-ethnic groups. We find that each additional COVID-19 death is linked to elevated depressive symptoms, anxiety, and anger. Bivariate analyses further indicate Black and Latine respondents experienced significantly more COVID-19 losses relative to White and Asian respondents, although the difference between Latine and Asian participants was attenuated following adjustment for sociodemographic factors. Whereas COVID-19 losses do not hold stronger associations with distress among Black or Asian respondents relative to White participants, the magnitude of the association between COVID-19 bereavement and each measure of distress is significantly larger among Latine respondents relative to their Black and White counterparts. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding the racialized nature of pandemic loss and its psychological sequelae.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.