Differential snow depth in warm edges versus cold edges of forest gaps, and its potential implications for tree growth in a Sierra Nevada conifer forest
Aidan Manning , Adam Csank , Scott Allen , Adrian Harpold
{"title":"Differential snow depth in warm edges versus cold edges of forest gaps, and its potential implications for tree growth in a Sierra Nevada conifer forest","authors":"Aidan Manning , Adam Csank , Scott Allen , Adrian Harpold","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest canopy gaps affect the timing and amount of snowmelt, because canopies act as key controls over snowpack dynamics. Overlying canopy can decrease snowpack by intercepting snowfall, but it can also reduce ablation rates via shading. Changes in forest structure and canopy gaps may therefore affect the amount, timing, and duration of snowmelt and potentially forest response to water limitations. We examine opposing edges of gaps, testing how higher energy-input (warm) edges differ from lower energy-input (cool) edges with respect to snow depth, snowmelt timing, and tree growth in a snow-dominated forest in the Western US. We use multiple dates of LiDAR-based measurement to assess springtime snow depths in warm and cool gap edges in Sagehen Creek Basin, CA. Then we use paired tree sampling and ring width chronologies to ascertain moisture sensitivity of trees adjacent to warm and cool edges. Pre-ablation snow depths in cool gap edges exceeded those in warm gap edges by 9–18 %, with effect size depending on elevation and aspect. Snowpack also persisted longer in cool edges than in warm edges. Growth variations in warm-edge-adjacent trees were more correlated with interannual variations in snow depth those of cool edge trees, although neither had strong correlations. These findings suggest that forest structures that maximize cool edge area may benefit snow depth and persistence, and may lead to cool-edge trees being less sensitive to interannual hydroclimatic variability than warm edge trees, despite this effect being small relative to other controls over growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"597 ","pages":"Article 123119"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725006279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Forest canopy gaps affect the timing and amount of snowmelt, because canopies act as key controls over snowpack dynamics. Overlying canopy can decrease snowpack by intercepting snowfall, but it can also reduce ablation rates via shading. Changes in forest structure and canopy gaps may therefore affect the amount, timing, and duration of snowmelt and potentially forest response to water limitations. We examine opposing edges of gaps, testing how higher energy-input (warm) edges differ from lower energy-input (cool) edges with respect to snow depth, snowmelt timing, and tree growth in a snow-dominated forest in the Western US. We use multiple dates of LiDAR-based measurement to assess springtime snow depths in warm and cool gap edges in Sagehen Creek Basin, CA. Then we use paired tree sampling and ring width chronologies to ascertain moisture sensitivity of trees adjacent to warm and cool edges. Pre-ablation snow depths in cool gap edges exceeded those in warm gap edges by 9–18 %, with effect size depending on elevation and aspect. Snowpack also persisted longer in cool edges than in warm edges. Growth variations in warm-edge-adjacent trees were more correlated with interannual variations in snow depth those of cool edge trees, although neither had strong correlations. These findings suggest that forest structures that maximize cool edge area may benefit snow depth and persistence, and may lead to cool-edge trees being less sensitive to interannual hydroclimatic variability than warm edge trees, despite this effect being small relative to other controls over growth.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.