Evaluation of clinical usability and reproducibility of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Müllerian Anomalies Classification

IF 1.7 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Julia Lastinger , Natalia Palasz , Peter Oppelt , Galymzhan Toktarbekov , Milan Terzic , Raimund Stein , Katharina Rall , Helga Wagner , Philipp Hermann , Stephanie Kiblboeck
{"title":"Evaluation of clinical usability and reproducibility of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Müllerian Anomalies Classification","authors":"Julia Lastinger ,&nbsp;Natalia Palasz ,&nbsp;Peter Oppelt ,&nbsp;Galymzhan Toktarbekov ,&nbsp;Milan Terzic ,&nbsp;Raimund Stein ,&nbsp;Katharina Rall ,&nbsp;Helga Wagner ,&nbsp;Philipp Hermann ,&nbsp;Stephanie Kiblboeck","doi":"10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To study the usability, reproducibility and practicality of the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine Müllerian Anomalies Classification (ASRM MAC2021) compared to the formerly used American Fertility Society (AFS) classification. The main focus of this paper is to present clinicians’ assessment when using these classification systems and to explore possible benefits and disadvantages of the transformation of the AFS into the more recently published ASRM classification. To incorporate all commonly used classification systems, all cases were additionally classified using the ESHRE/ESGE and the VCUAM classification.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An observational study using a questionnaire and opinion survey was conducted with the goal of comparing clinicians’ subjective usability and reproducibility of the AFS classification with the newly presented ASRM MAC2021 classification. Cases of female genital malformations encompassed a wide range of various anomalies, including vaginal, cervical and adnexal conditions and associated malformations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study investigators rated the ASRM MAC2021 classification better in relation to usability and reproducibility compared to the AFS classification. It significantly improved diagnostic precision for vaginal and cervical anomalies and expanded recognition of adnexal malformations. However, challenges remain in addressing associated malformations. Clinicians ranked the ASRM MAC2021 higher than the AFS classification. However, investigators rated the ESHRE/ESGE and VCUAM classifications better in the overall assessment of female genital malformations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The ASRM MAC2021 classification offers substantial improvements in diagnosing and managing female genital malformations, addressing limitations of the AFS system. With better usability and subjective reproducibility, further refinements are needed to fully address complex associated anomalies — emphasizing the importance of evolving classification systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37085,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161325000614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To study the usability, reproducibility and practicality of the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine Müllerian Anomalies Classification (ASRM MAC2021) compared to the formerly used American Fertility Society (AFS) classification. The main focus of this paper is to present clinicians’ assessment when using these classification systems and to explore possible benefits and disadvantages of the transformation of the AFS into the more recently published ASRM classification. To incorporate all commonly used classification systems, all cases were additionally classified using the ESHRE/ESGE and the VCUAM classification.

Methods

An observational study using a questionnaire and opinion survey was conducted with the goal of comparing clinicians’ subjective usability and reproducibility of the AFS classification with the newly presented ASRM MAC2021 classification. Cases of female genital malformations encompassed a wide range of various anomalies, including vaginal, cervical and adnexal conditions and associated malformations.

Results

The study investigators rated the ASRM MAC2021 classification better in relation to usability and reproducibility compared to the AFS classification. It significantly improved diagnostic precision for vaginal and cervical anomalies and expanded recognition of adnexal malformations. However, challenges remain in addressing associated malformations. Clinicians ranked the ASRM MAC2021 higher than the AFS classification. However, investigators rated the ESHRE/ESGE and VCUAM classifications better in the overall assessment of female genital malformations.

Conclusion

The ASRM MAC2021 classification offers substantial improvements in diagnosing and managing female genital malformations, addressing limitations of the AFS system. With better usability and subjective reproducibility, further refinements are needed to fully address complex associated anomalies — emphasizing the importance of evolving classification systems.
美国生殖医学学会勒氏异常分类的临床可用性和可重复性评价
目的比较修订后的美国生殖医学学会勒氏异常分类(ASRM MAC2021)与原美国生育学会(AFS)分类的可用性、可重复性和实用性。本文的主要重点是介绍临床医生在使用这些分类系统时的评估,并探讨将AFS转换为最近发表的ASRM分类可能的利弊。为了纳入所有常用的分类系统,所有病例都使用ESHRE/ESGE和VCUAM分类进行额外分类。方法采用问卷调查和意见调查进行观察性研究,目的是比较临床医生对AFS分类与新提出的ASRM MAC2021分类的主观可用性和可重复性。女性生殖器畸形的病例包括各种各样的异常,包括阴道、宫颈和附件疾病以及相关的畸形。与AFS分类相比,研究人员认为ASRM MAC2021分类在可用性和可重复性方面更好。它显著提高了阴道和宫颈异常的诊断精度,扩大了对附件畸形的识别。然而,在解决相关畸形方面仍然存在挑战。临床医生对ASRM MAC2021分级的评价高于AFS分级。然而,研究人员认为ESHRE/ESGE和VCUAM分类在女性生殖器畸形的总体评估中更好。结论ASRM MAC2021分类对女性生殖器畸形的诊断和管理有实质性的改进,解决了AFS系统的局限性。有了更好的可用性和主观再现性,需要进一步的改进来充分解决复杂的相关异常——强调不断发展的分类系统的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信